BRZ vs Alpine A110 - Hot Version

[JIM THEO]

Originally Posted by nikitopo

Yes, this is correct. The track is short and 1 second difference is a bigger difference.

About a more equiped 86/BRZ, the 86 GR car had two seconds of difference on a bigger track. Of course, it is a different track. So, it cannot give us a clear understanding of how much the time would improve with the Alpine ...

86 GR: 1'18"40
BRZ Sti sport: 1'20"54

With what rear tire size which affects overall times?

[LancePower]

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86

Something about the A110's shape bothers me especially when you see it from all angles. I find it to be the least sexy new MR car period but I would rather have it over a lot of other cars however.

I concur. It's hideous from every angle.

Those front auxiliary lights are an abomination.

The rear has the "droopy butt syndrome" which is all the rage these days.

And the profile has the CUV floating-roof design.

[Ultramaroon]

Originally Posted by ichitaka05

Toyota should have brought TRD 14R60. It would of been good match up. Price is bout $10k difference instead of more than double plus would of been interested to see how 14R60 could of done

fify


should've = contraction of should have


carry on

[nikitopo]

Originally Posted by JIM THEO

With what rear tire size which affects overall times?

86 GR has a staggered setup like Alpine. Rear is 235.

[JIM THEO]

Originally Posted by nikitopo

86 GR has a staggered setup like Alpine. Rear is 235.

I knew it, just want you to write it here!
That;s why it has better times than tS which is more road focused rather track oriented!

[Ernest72]

These videos make think for price of these other cars you just get two BRZs. One for DD and road fun and one for the track. Pending mods you do, it would be cheaper too. Definitively in the maintenance department. Agree with above I would take a cayman over the alpine, but it’s a nice car.