follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-24-2017, 09:18 AM   #15
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozri View Post
I'm in the market for boosting my 2017 Toyota 86.
I know both come with their own positives and negatives.
But, which is best for the 86?
Thanks in advance!
Best is the one you want.

Both can easily get you over 500hp, with the right supporting mods.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 11:05 AM   #16
Grady
Senior Member
 
Grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: BRZ Yellow, 2019 Ranger, 2011 Evora
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,705
Thanks: 354
Thanked 1,489 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I was set on a supercharger. One of my biggest requirements was reliability. This ended up with me buying a turbo charger since they are a simpler design with less moving parts. (May be a little more complicated to install? Both will only take you a day.) On both if you shell you compressor you may destroy your engine. If shell the drive on a supercharger you are calling a tow truck, on a turbo you limp home.
Grady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 05:30 PM   #17
nos145
Cognite
 
nos145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FRS
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 245
Thanks: 121
Thanked 57 Times in 52 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
2017

edelbrock. they run a warranty on your engine.
nos145 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nos145 For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (12-24-2017)
Old 12-24-2017, 08:58 PM   #18
gtengr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 655
Thanks: 326
Thanked 258 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grady View Post
I was set on a supercharger. One of my biggest requirements was reliability. This ended up with me buying a turbo charger since they are a simpler design with less moving parts. (May be a little more complicated to install? Both will only take you a day.) On both if you shell you compressor you may destroy your engine. If shell the drive on a supercharger you are calling a tow truck, on a turbo you limp home.
Oil pan tap, dedicated oil pump, radiant heat roasting wires and shortening component life, cracked manifolds, higher initial expense, no good way to turbo and keep emissions cert (yes I'm aware of the one carb turbo kit but it's gimped). Not too attractive a trade off imo for the advantage of being able to limp home a trashed turbo.
gtengr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 09:12 PM   #19
Grady
Senior Member
 
Grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: BRZ Yellow, 2019 Ranger, 2011 Evora
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,705
Thanks: 354
Thanked 1,489 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtengr View Post
Oil pan tap, dedicated oil pump, radiant heat roasting wires and shortening component life, cracked manifolds, higher initial expense, no good way to turbo and keep emissions cert (yes I'm aware of the one carb turbo kit but it's gimped). Not too attractive a trade off imo for the advantage of being able to limp home a trashed turbo.
No oil pan tap? Even if I had to do that who cares it is a quick weld. Scavenge pump is no issue. Radiant head? You just have to insulate and make sure you improve air flow. Higher initial expense? Not sure where you came up with that? Even if it cost more who cares, These cars are enexpensive. Emissions cert? Who cares I do not live in CA.
Grady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 10:21 PM   #20
gtengr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 655
Thanks: 326
Thanked 258 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grady View Post
Higher initial expense? Not sure where you came up with that?
Basic addition using quality parts. I did the math.

What is the parts list for this complete turbo kit that is both cheaper and more reliable than a supercharger?
gtengr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 10:39 PM   #21
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grady View Post
No oil pan tap? Even if I had to do that who cares it is a quick weld. Scavenge pump is no issue. Radiant head? You just have to insulate and make sure you improve air flow. Higher initial expense? Not sure where you came up with that? Even if it cost more who cares, These cars are enexpensive. Emissions cert? Who cares I do not live in CA.
Turbo is definitely a higher initial cost if you want to do it *right*.

That being said, my own car is turbocharged.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Evil Rocky (12-25-2017)
Old 12-24-2017, 11:11 PM   #22
StraightOuttaCanadaEh
Wes
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: Artisan Spirits '17 86
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,871
Thanks: 1,255
Thanked 1,734 Times in 1,025 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nos145 View Post
2017

edelbrock. they run a warranty on your engine.
I should add that they only cover your engine during the manufacturer warranty period, not from the day you install the e-force. And only if you take it to an approved installer. If your car is already 3 years old, there is no warranty.
__________________
Instagram: @gt86ws
StraightOuttaCanadaEh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to StraightOuttaCanadaEh For This Useful Post:
weederr33 (12-25-2017)
Old 12-25-2017, 02:23 AM   #23
fx1mark
Senior Member
 
fx1mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: red 2014 FR-S
Location: Alabama
Posts: 259
Thanks: 52
Thanked 162 Times in 99 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mighty car mods did a Turbocharged vs Supercharged with Miata's that I enjoyed watching.


[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0NMCMcdVp4&t=647s"]Turbocharged vs. Supercharged - Part 1 - YouTube[/ame]
fx1mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2017, 04:29 AM   #24
Somerandom18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 2017 manual BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 467
Thanks: 322
Thanked 178 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by StraightOuttaCanadaEh View Post
I should add that they only cover your engine during the manufacturer warranty period, not from the day you install the e-force. And only if you take it to an approved installer. If your car is already 3 years old, there is no warranty.
Not the powertrain warranty?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Somerandom18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2017, 12:03 PM   #25
TofuJoe
Ohne Titel
 
TofuJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 2017 BRZ PP ISM
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 684
Thanks: 1,141
Thanked 412 Times in 234 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somerandom18 View Post
Not the powertrain warranty?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
3 years/36,000 miles measured from the original date of the car’s purchase, and 0 miles on the odometer.
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/...y/eforce.shtml
TofuJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2017, 04:07 PM   #26
-Willis-86touge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: Stock
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 206
Thanks: 52
Thanked 48 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Turbo vs supercharger has always been a debate! I can say that there are steps into finding out witch is right for your!...
1. How much power do you want?
A. Yes a super can make good horsepower, but probably not as much as a turbo!
B. So let’s assume you have decided one under 500hp.
2. Do you want to build your engine?
A. Supercharger makes roughly 300-400 stock block
B. Turbo makes roughly 400-500 hp stock block
3. Have you ever drove a boosted car before?
A. If you like the way a turbo drives that’s something to consider
B. A supercharger is like driving a na car but with more power
1.twin screw charger is like having a bigger motor(v6-v8)
2. Centrifugal charger is like the motor is like driving this same motor but with higher pull at top end. Almost like a turbo without the abrupt hit of power
4. What are you using your car for?
A. Remember a supercharger has almost zero lag, never worry about losing power
B. A turbo if not driven right will lose power during shift, in corners, etc.
5. What about install
A. Turbo more complex install and more time and money
B. Supercharger install still not easy (who is installing??)
6. What tuning option do you have?
A. Do you live next to someone who can trouble shoot a turbo
B. ?? Trouble shoot a supercharger??
7. Finally let’s look at reliability?
A. Turbo-more heat
B. Supercharger-if something happens to belt your stuck


**************disclaimer**********************
This is just a opinion, nothing here was ment to hurt or harm the reputation of the other. This was just information ment to help one in a better choice. If anyone should take my advice seriously, they do so at there own risk. I am not responsible for any dumbass action in choosing one over the other! If you blow your engine its not my fault, you should of pick the other!! Lol
-Willis-86touge is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to -Willis-86touge For This Useful Post:
Evil Rocky (12-25-2017), southside iraq (12-25-2017), Tcoat (12-25-2017)
Old 12-26-2017, 08:30 AM   #27
Matt@Cosworth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: blue - Cosworth SC stage 3.0
Location: Northants - UK
Posts: 333
Thanks: 3
Thanked 394 Times in 184 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fx1mark View Post
Mighty car mods did a Turbocharged vs Supercharged with Miata's that I enjoyed watching.


a good piece of telly but I was dissapointed they used a centrifugal blower
if they had a twin screw / eaton type on there it would have been a better comparison
Matt@Cosworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 06:57 PM   #28
Grady
Senior Member
 
Grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: BRZ Yellow, 2019 Ranger, 2011 Evora
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,705
Thanks: 354
Thanked 1,489 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtengr View Post
Basic addition using quality parts. I did the math.

What is the parts list for this complete turbo kit that is both cheaper and more reliable than a supercharger?
For me $500 on a $5k to $6k expense is negligible. Jackson racing kit $4k, I received a ok deal on an AVO kit $4.5K.

I started this journey wanting the Sprintex. Looks like a good reliable supercharger. (Same price as the AVO). One thing for me is it has to look like it belongs. Decided I did not want to give up my 2017 red intake. This pushed me toward the HKS kit since it is the cleanest looking install out of all the kits. After reading the owners thread and not being able to get thru any page without someone complaining about a supercharger failure decided that is not a good choice for me(I am sure a lot of the failures are self induced). Then looked into the Jackson racing. That one appears to be the most reliable out of all of them. But did not like the looks with the air cleaner out in the open in the engine bay. Then if you add a cold air you end up having to take the front bumper off to clean the filter. Do not want that ether. The 2017 filter is acceptable for my requirements. Then I was looking at the Works kit. Clean install but will not fit the 2017 at this time. I stumbled across the AVO kit. Has an extremely clean looking install all the heat is generated where the original exhaust was designed to be. All the above kits will get me in the 300hp range with E85. And yes I have read all the above installation manuals plus more. and do not see that any one is more difficult than the other.

Anyway all of them would be fun they are forced induction! For me the turbo brings a more reliable platoform. To each his own this is why we have such great choices for this car. What other car do you have this many options for forced induction? It makes it hard to decide.
Grady is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
installing a supercharge kennyd8606 Forced Induction 20 08-12-2016 03:09 PM
Turbocharge vs. Supercharge vs. None Cojonudo Forced Induction 39 12-23-2015 07:20 AM
Can't decide (new to car mods) turbo or supercharge Mikeez Forced Induction 89 06-17-2014 05:06 PM
Unnecessary Boost needed (Turbo or Supercharge) Nickse30 Forced Induction 32 05-27-2013 01:57 PM
if going FI, would you turbocharge or supercharge? tibsy92 AUSTRALIA 35 08-18-2012 11:02 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.