follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS]

Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] For all off-topic discussion topics.

View Poll Results: Hydrogen, Electric, Petrol
Hydrogen 5 23.81%
Electric 11 52.38%
I'll never drive an electric car! 5 23.81%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-21-2015, 03:06 PM   #15
HachiEnam
UCSB!!!
 
HachiEnam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: 2017 GTI sport
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 177
Thanks: 95
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Don't forget about the rare earth metals that makes it expensive and rather bad for the environment
HachiEnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 03:08 PM   #16
Special_K
Bannéd
 
Special_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2013 DGM BRZ
Location: WA
Posts: 1,425
Thanks: 1,671
Thanked 2,079 Times in 912 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HachiEnam View Post
From what I'm learning in my ECE classes is that the reason technology became so microscopic was mainly due to the existence of transistors. Previously resistors were prohibiting us from minimizing these boards. Nowadays CPUs are being limited by silicon.

I'm not too sure about batteries but supercapacitors seem pretty promising.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fang_gt86 View Post
Moore's law?

It's all about the material they use for making the batteries. Most batteries are made with the cheaper metal: steel, zinc, manganese and potassium. You can only make these batteries so small using these material.
I completely understand that I'm comparing apples to oranges here. I just mean that it's surprising how with all the incredible tech advances we have, we're still using the same battery principles that pre-date most civilizations.
__________________
The fascinating thing about my signature is that by the time you realize that it is of no importance, it will also be too late to stop reading it. Good luck getting those five seconds of your life back.
Special_K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 04:00 PM   #17
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,838
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HachiEnam View Post
The car will retain its handling characteristic, It'll have that torque people have been thirstin for. Zero Emissions.



No trolls please, just want to hear your opinions.
Ok, if this is a strictly theoretical discussion and the car maintains the exact same characteristics then weight, range, etc don't come into play. I don't care if it weighs 10,000 pounds as long as everything remains identical. I would chose whichever would be cheaper to operate and maintain. Which of the choices that is I have no clue.

Oh and just because you said not too:

__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
HachiEnam (09-21-2015)
Old 09-21-2015, 04:07 PM   #18
SVTSHC
(ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
 
SVTSHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2015 Series Blue BRZ
Location: Bronx
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 930
Thanked 625 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
electric, but only after battery tech evolves into something a little more practical as far as weight and distance per charge goes.
__________________

"Sweet Subaru, sweet Subaru, send your BRZ unto me, for the roads of the unworthy must be baptized in speed and glory." ~Zaku
SVTSHC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 04:16 PM   #19
jvincent
Senior Member
 
jvincent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2022 WRB BRZ Sport-Tech
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 131
Thanked 1,411 Times in 715 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HachiEnam View Post
From what I'm learning in my ECE classes is that the reason technology became so microscopic was mainly due to the existence of transistors. Previously resistors were prohibiting us from minimizing these boards. Nowadays CPUs are being limited by silicon.

I'm not too sure about batteries but supercapacitors seem pretty promising.
Your first comments are a little off base. Semiconductor technology has gotten smaller over time because smaller generally means cheaper and faster. It's just the continuous improvement of the transistor technology.

I'm not sure what you mean by CPUs are limited by silicon, and I design CPUs for a living.

The problem with supercaps and batteries is that they simply don't have the energy density of gasoline.

Gasoline: 44MJ/kg
Li battery: 1.8MJ/kg
Super cap: 0.018 MJ/kg

The numbers above are from Wiki, so they may not be gospel, but you get the idea.

If you want to be able to drive your car even moderate distances, you'll need a huge ass battery.
jvincent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jvincent For This Useful Post:
HachiEnam (09-21-2015)
Old 09-21-2015, 04:18 PM   #20
jvincent
Senior Member
 
jvincent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2022 WRB BRZ Sport-Tech
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 131
Thanked 1,411 Times in 715 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTSHC View Post
electric, but only after battery tech evolves into something a little more practical as far as weight and distance per charge goes.
If somebody could come up with a usable battery that is 4x more capable than today Li-ion batteries he would be a gajillionaire overnight.

There has only been incremental improvement in battery energy density over the last several decades.
jvincent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 04:25 PM   #21
Sideways
BRZZZZZ
 
Sideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2013 BRZ Whiteout
Location: The White North
Posts: 318
Thanks: 96
Thanked 161 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
One thing I like about driving my car is the feel and sound of pistons thumping inside that engine block which you can never get from electric or hydrogen power plants. So, I will always prefer gas engine.

But, that being said, we built Formula SAE electric car when I was in univ and that thing was a rocket....sooo much torque!!! But power source was an issue as you can only run the car for so much before its out of juice. So, if in the neat future, we can figure out better power source, I may consider electric power plant....maybe a small nuclear reactor...lol!!
Sideways is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 04:27 PM   #22
Ultramaroon
not playing cards
 
Ultramaroon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 32,392
Thanks: 53,053
Thanked 37,228 Times in 19,308 Posts
Mentioned: 1118 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jvincent View Post
Your first comments are a little off base. Semiconductor technology has gotten smaller over time because smaller generally means cheaper and faster. It's just the continuous improvement of the transistor technology.

I'm not sure what you mean by CPUs are limited by silicon, and I design CPUs for a living.

The problem with supercaps and batteries is that they simply don't have the energy density of gasoline.

Gasoline: 44MJ/kg
Li battery: 1.8MJ/kg
Super cap: 0.018 MJ/kg

The numbers above are from Wiki, so they may not be gospel, but you get the idea.

If you want to be able to drive your car even moderate distances, you'll need a huge ass battery.
^^^ was planning on adding to the conversation but no need. This is pretty much it.
__________________
Ultramaroon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 04:30 PM   #23
Ultramaroon
not playing cards
 
Ultramaroon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 32,392
Thanks: 53,053
Thanked 37,228 Times in 19,308 Posts
Mentioned: 1118 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sideways View Post
I may consider electric power plant....maybe a small nuclear reactor...lol!!
__________________
Ultramaroon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ultramaroon For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (09-21-2015)
Old 09-21-2015, 04:36 PM   #24
SVTSHC
(ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
 
SVTSHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2015 Series Blue BRZ
Location: Bronx
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 930
Thanked 625 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jvincent View Post
If somebody could come up with a usable battery that is 4x more capable than today Li-ion batteries he would be a gajillionaire overnight.

There has only been incremental improvement in battery energy density over the last several decades.
They would need to turn that into a real figure for someone like that. It'll happen at some point, I'm positive of it. We're on the cusp of nanotech anyway.
__________________

"Sweet Subaru, sweet Subaru, send your BRZ unto me, for the roads of the unworthy must be baptized in speed and glory." ~Zaku
SVTSHC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 04:42 PM   #25
Special_K
Bannéd
 
Special_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2013 DGM BRZ
Location: WA
Posts: 1,425
Thanks: 1,671
Thanked 2,079 Times in 912 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jvincent View Post
If somebody could come up with a usable battery that is 4x more capable than today Li-ion batteries he would be a gajillionaire overnight.

There has only been incremental improvement in battery energy density over the last several decades.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTSHC View Post
They would need to turn that into a real figure for someone like that. It'll happen at some point, I'm positive of it. We're on the cusp of nanotech anyway.
That's what pissed me off about Iron Man/Tony Stark... Dude made a fusion arc reactor that could fit in your pocket, and instead of propelling the world into a new age of clean energy, he simply uses it to power his toys so he can more efficiently bash people's skulls in.
__________________
The fascinating thing about my signature is that by the time you realize that it is of no importance, it will also be too late to stop reading it. Good luck getting those five seconds of your life back.
Special_K is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Special_K For This Useful Post:
SVTSHC (09-22-2015)
Old 09-21-2015, 04:55 PM   #26
HachiEnam
UCSB!!!
 
HachiEnam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: 2017 GTI sport
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 177
Thanks: 95
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jvincent View Post
Your first comments are a little off base. Semiconductor technology has gotten smaller over time because smaller generally means cheaper and faster. It's just the continuous improvement of the transistor technology.

I'm not sure what you mean by CPUs are limited by silicon, and I design CPUs for a living.

The problem with supercaps and batteries is that they simply don't have the energy density of gasoline.

Gasoline: 44MJ/kg
Li battery: 1.8MJ/kg
Super cap: 0.018 MJ/kg

The numbers above are from Wiki, so they may not be gospel, but you get the idea.

If you want to be able to drive your car even moderate distances, you'll need a huge ass battery.
Ahh yeah don't quote me I'm still just a student. I'm image processing intern at an engineering firm where I'm learning how to parallel program. I took a short course to learn more about Cuda and parallel programming and they mentioned that CPU's have been getting smaller and faster but it recently plateau'd since they were getting too hot for the silicon.

If I'm wrong feel free to correct me. Main reason why I made this thread was cause I just wanna learn

Last edited by HachiEnam; 09-21-2015 at 05:10 PM.
HachiEnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 05:03 PM   #27
DAEMANO
Time Traveller
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS - Raven
Location: So Cal - Orange County
Posts: 3,705
Thanks: 9,534
Thanked 3,418 Times in 1,677 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Garage
Electrically Supercharged!

Added cost - ~$2k
Added weight - None
Added power - lots
Added torque - OMG
Improved fuel economy - who cares!



[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C83mb-BI8ZM"] 1 [/ame]
DAEMANO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2015, 05:40 PM   #28
jvincent
Senior Member
 
jvincent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2022 WRB BRZ Sport-Tech
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 131
Thanked 1,411 Times in 715 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HachiEnam View Post
I took a short course to learn more about Cuda and parallel programming and they mentioned that CPU's have been getting smaller and faster but it recently plateau'd since they were getting too hot for the silicon.
Don't sweat it, everyone needs to learn.

The issue that they were trying to highlight is that they are exceeding the thermal budget for the intended application. It's not an inherent limitation of the silicon. If you have enough money to provide the required cooling, the silicon will run very, very fast. The problem is most people aren't willing to pay for that extra performance.

Like every other engineering problem, it's a trade-off.

Getting back on topic, just like electric cars. Yes, you can power them with batteries or caps, but just don't expect to go very far. Or very fast for very long.

The most efficient options are things like the i8 or Porsche 918. A gasoline power plant that can run at maximum efficiency which provides power to an electrical engine. You can use caps/batteries to store energy and act as a buffer or power smoother so that the gasoline engine runs efficiently.
jvincent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jvincent For This Useful Post:
HachiEnam (09-21-2015)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
electric cutout davebrus Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 0 03-21-2014 12:26 PM
electric short Abdo Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 11 02-07-2014 04:14 PM
Electric Turbocharger Shankenstein Forced Induction 91 06-24-2013 02:47 PM
Electric FR-S by TGMY Surok Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 39 12-03-2012 03:43 PM
Electric 86 frosty86 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 8 11-10-2012 02:16 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.