follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-24-2015, 01:17 PM   #113
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_F View Post
Definitely not a troll. =)

It is just a misrepresentation of the Cosworth kit with respect to the track day comment. Due to the limited amount in the US, I would have to assume you have not actually seen one at the track. The cooler arrangement and charger were selected to not have issues no matter what is thrown at them. That is all I am trying to convey. Misinformation is bad overall.
Have you seen one at the track?

All that chart tells me is that it doesn't get super hot in one pull; I don't think any kit does. It says nothing about extended use.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Decay107 (08-24-2015), glamcem (08-24-2015)
Old 08-24-2015, 02:43 PM   #114
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
My E85 frs hangs with a wrx...

wrx is heavier and only makes 268 bhp... a 270 whp twin will walk it all day and all night...an sti only makes 305 bhp...

Jaden
okay so are you suggesting that your E85 FRS is CARB legal? if not how is is related to the topic? it seems like nobody reads anything these days

E85 and supporting mods adds about 100hp on top of the CARB tuned car that already makes 260-270whp (365whp vs 260 whp).. that's roughly 37-38% more than what the CARB tuned car does.. sooo..

It would be a shame if it couldn't walk away from a 250 AWHP stock STI
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 02:44 PM   #115
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
dynos don't tell shit about real world especially comparing two cars that are 700 lbs difference...

so yeah maybe you should stop believing what makes you feel better.

Jaden
oh boy,
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 04:52 PM   #116
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
ummm...

Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
okay so are you suggesting that your E85 FRS is CARB legal? if not how is is related to the topic? it seems like nobody reads anything these days

E85 and supporting mods adds about 100hp on top of the CARB tuned car that already makes 260-270whp (365whp vs 260 whp).. that's roughly 37-38% more than what the CARB tuned car does.. sooo..

It would be a shame if it couldn't walk away from a 250 AWHP stock STI
I'm n/a... I'm making about 230bhp compared to 268bhp for a wrx. Which with the weight difference makes them about even on paper...

I'm talking about not on paper though...

Same thing with an A4 and a GTI....

Jaden

And as far as carb, there is no one that could EVER write me up for ANYTHING with my car tuned the way it is right now. It looks bone stock except for the cat back, which I've already had certified as carb compliant.
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 04:55 PM   #117
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
oh boy,
What part was hard to understand for you?

a) That comparing raw dyno'd hp between cars that are 7-800 lbs different isn't good for anything?

b) That dyno'd hp doesn't always equate to real world performance?

or that you thinking that a 270whp car that weighs 700lbs less than a 268 bhp car shouldn't be able to walk it because DYNO, is utterly laughable????

Jaden

Last edited by Jaden; 08-24-2015 at 05:32 PM.
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 05:33 PM   #118
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
I'm n/a... I'm making about 230bhp compared to 268bhp for a wrx. Which with the weight difference makes them about even on paper...

I'm talking about not on paper though...

Same thing with an A4 and a GTI....

Jaden

And as far as carb, there is no one that could EVER write me up for ANYTHING with my car tuned the way it is right now. It looks bone stock except for the cat back, which I've already had certified as carb compliant.
ok I was under the impression that you had an E85 JRSC kit since you didn't mention that important detail and wrote this in FI section

if that's the case I can clearly say there's no way you can keep up with a stock WRX from roll the weight difference alone (about 500 lbs not 700lbs, 2700lbs vs 3200lbs) is not enough to make up for the difference, by the time you reach that 230 bhp WRX will already be way ahead of you because of the huge TQ advantage
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 05:41 PM   #119
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
What part was hard to understand for you?

a) That comparing raw dyno'd hp between cars that are 7-800 lbs different isn't good for anything?

b) That dyno'd hp doesn't always equate to real world performance?

or that you thinking that a 270whp car that weighs 700lbs less than a 268 bhp car shouldn't be able to walk it because DYNO, is utterly laughable????

Jaden
piece of advice, using titles named like "ummm" "what" "are you smoking crack???" won't make your posts more credible, it will only make them silly

there is no part on any of your posts hard to understand for me but it looks like there are multiple posts about the topic was hard to follow for you or you just didn't bother reading them up..

you should ask yourself this question : "Am I really trying to learn something new today or Am I simply trying to win a debate?" if the answer is the first part, please do read all the posts and come back and ask your questions again

if you bring something new to the table that we don't know of I am happy to read and change my views accordingly, until then please keep the things I mentioned above
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to glamcem For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (08-24-2015)
Old 08-24-2015, 05:43 PM   #120
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What about the real world did you not understand???

Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
ok I was under the impression that you had an E85 JRSC kit since you didn't mention that important detail and wrote this in FI section

if that's the case I can clearly say there's no way you can keep up with a stock WRX from roll the weight difference alone (about 500 lbs not 700lbs, 2700lbs vs 3200lbs) is not enough to make up for the difference, by the time you reach that 230 bhp WRX will already be way ahead of you because of the huge TQ advantage
What about the REAL WORLD part of that did you NOT understand...

This is not fanciful daydreaming while glancing at dyno charts... This is actually running against them in the REAL WORLD...

Jaden

and 2758-2806lbs versus 3267-3450 so you're looking at as little as 461lbs or as much as 692 lbs difference. for an average difference of 577 and yes it is enough to make up a 35hp difference...obviously because it WAS enough, again, in the real world.

Also, it's pretty obvious that it's not ME who needs to be learning something.. I wasn't the one who said that a 270 WHEEL hp car weighing between 500 and 700 lbs less than a car that makes 234 Wheel hp couldn't walk said car. The STI only makes about 255 WHP and wouldn't stand a chance either.

Last edited by Jaden; 08-24-2015 at 06:01 PM.
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 05:56 PM   #121
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
What about the REAL WORLD part of that did you NOT understand...

This is not fanciful daydreaming while glancing at dyno charts... This is actually running against them in the REAL WORLD...

Jaden
Like I said please do read the entire thread from the beginning and come back and ask your question again, if you still cannot find the answer I will be happy to answer for you why the REAL WORLD experience will differ

let's forget about the REAL WORLD conditions (healthier hp due to OEM power, less heat, better matched gear) for a second and concentrate on the" dyno queens " for a second do you actually believe that 500 lbs is enough to make up for the TQ difference down low.. I did my best to include an NA E85 dyno plot with green line in the below dyno comparison ... notice that huge TQ difference in blue and green lines and you'll understand why .. if you still think that it should keep up with an WRX slowly drop the crack pipe you were referring to

Name:  stockwrxbrz.jpg
Views: 779
Size:  88.7 KB
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 06:06 PM   #122
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Wait a minute???

Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
Like I said please do read the entire thread from the beginning and come back and ask your question again, if you still cannot find the answer I will be happy to answer for you why the REAL WORLD experience will differ

let's forget about the REAL WORLD conditions (healthier hp due to OEM power, less heat, better matched gear) for a second and concentrate on the" dyno queens " for a second do you actually believe that 500 lbs is enough to make up for the TQ difference down low.. I did my best to include an NA E85 dyno plot with green line in the below dyno comparison ... notice that huge TQ difference in blue and green lines and you'll understand why .. if you still think that it should keep up with an WRX slowly drop the crack pipe you were referring to

Attachment 118653

Were you NOT the one who said from a ROLL????

I can quote you if you'd like? That low down torque ain't gonna mean shit from a roll where you can down shift to be in whatever rpm range you want.

Jaden
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 06:07 PM   #123
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
keep in mind Turbo BRZ had the head start here

[ame="http://youtu.be/wKmUI9s45kY"]https://youtu.be/wKmUI9s45kY[/ame]
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 06:14 PM   #124
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
Were you NOT the one who said from a ROLL????

I can quote you if you'd like? That low down torque ain't gonna mean shit from a roll where you can down shift to be in whatever rpm range you want.

Jaden
no, I didn't bring these claims to begin with, I just found them a bit more unrealistic and tried to explain a few things..
no matter what you do, you won't be able to make up that TQ difference even if you downshift ( I don't know what that means from a roll-race) because the higher you start in the power band sooner you should shift to the next gear ..and as soon as you shift up to next gear a WRX will start pulling away from you so hard and say buh-bye..
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 06:16 PM   #125
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
dude....

Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
keep in mind Turbo BRZ had the head start here


Really, and you know the owners of both cars and know what has been done to the EVO?

Not to mention, this is not from a roll. This is standing quarter mile.

The EVO is AWD and has a much quicker 60ft as you can tell by the twin with a higher trap speed in the second race.

There's really no reason to even continue debating as you don't have a clue what the hell you are talking about.

Jaden
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2015, 06:19 PM   #126
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
tell that to the WRX driver...

Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
no, I didn't bring these claims to begin with, I just found them a bit more unrealistic and tried to explain a few things..
no matter what you do, you won't be able to make up that TQ difference even if you downshift ( I don't know what that means from a roll-race) because the higher you start in the power band sooner you should shift to the next gear ..and as soon as you shift up to next gear a WRX will start pulling away from you so hard and say buh-bye..
You may want to tell that to the WRX driver who probably thought that on the freeway against me...

Also, just like CSG Mike said, you are incapable of not jumping around aren't you?

We were talking about a stock WRX versus a JRSC twin, and you post a video of an EVO (that could be a stage III) versus a Turbo twin that for all you know was running 5lbs of boost...

Jaden

You attempting to debate me is like a one legged man attempting to run the 50yd dash against usain bolt.
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best exhaust mod path for a daily driver FR-Slide Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 48 02-25-2014 02:51 PM
Nameless Full 3" Exhaust Review FR-S Matt Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 45 11-03-2013 09:40 PM
Daily driver dyno and modifications review (Raceseng pulley update) Fofofawcett Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 12 08-29-2013 11:57 AM
The $25k daily driver challenge - multi car review inside Re_Invention FR-S / BRZ vs.... 61 06-21-2013 01:57 PM
OhDamn.co Review of the FRS as a daily driver Oh Damn Andrew Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 11 10-22-2012 12:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.