Comparison of the best ~2 liter N/A engines ever produced

[DohcTor]

Originally Posted by Koa

I can't make a judgment about how you specifically waste time, but I can judge you based on my e-know how about culture and automotive technical paradigms

you're way out of your league

How about adding to the conversation, instead of trolling others....

[CSG Mike]

Originally Posted by cdrazic93

so, it sounds (literally) like it will run for a lap before you have to replace those valve springs for a 430 hp capable cam.

It's a drag race engine.... but IIRC it's currently at 60+ passes.

[CSG Mike]

Originally Posted by juliog

But... displacement is no longer 2.0L after all that -_-

2.7... but neither are these K24 that he keeps trying to compare

[Jond63]

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86

I had a K20A3 and torque-wise even though the FA20 has a torque dip I prefered the FA20's low end way better. I'm sure the K20A2 feels better up top because of the extra 550 rpms of the same power spread throughout.

I feel exactly the same way about my old F20C. Just not fun unless I was pretty much hooning around.

[tahdizzle]

Originally Posted by 86Tony

How does it not? F20c vs k24 what else we trying to prove here.

For the same reason certain people can pass cars with 2x the Horsepower on the track.

[CSG Mike]

Originally Posted by tahdizzle

For the same reason certain people can pass cars with 2x the Horsepower on the track.

Well, he also missed the memo in the topic title about it being 2L, not 2.4L....

[86Tony]

Originally Posted by CSG Mike

Well, he also missed the memo in the topic title about it being 2L, not 2.4L....

LOL did I not post a 900hp k20 mr2? I know how good the f20c is but you can't even take the fact that the k20 is just as good so no more point in debating with you. Since you a die hard f20c fan Boy they both can make xx amount of horsepower both can Rev to 9k+ both can do what the other can do only diffrence is the k20 has a slightly better tq band.

[CSG Mike]

Originally Posted by 86Tony

LOL did I not post a 900hp k20 mr2? I know how good the f20c is but you can't even take the fact that the k20 is just as good so no more point in debating with you. Since you a die hard f20c fan Boy they both can make xx amount of horsepower both can Rev to 9k+ both can do what the other can do only diffrence is the k20 has a slightly better tq band.

You just don't get it.

Stock block F20Cs get into the 1xxx hp range.

Built F20Cs rev 11k+

Nobody gives a shit about low and mid range torque band, if they're making that kind of power. A built K20 that makes top end power has nothing down low.

[86Tony]

Ok k20 also can hit 1000hp range on stock block and can Rev to 11k+ your point is?

[86Tony]

I don't get what so hard for you to understand. You can say the f20 can make this and that but at the end of the day the k20 can do the same.

[krayzie]

BMW S14B20 engine?

[themadscientist]

[krayzie]

If I didn't see that Nissan logo at the corner, I would have thought that's a Ford Cosworth valve cover lol!

[Koa]

Originally Posted by DohcTor

How about adding to the conversation, instead of trolling others....

Lighten up, buttercup.