follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2010, 05:57 AM   #15
overvolting
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Drives: Integra type-r
Location: MA
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
They've taken shots of the undercarriage and it has macphersons up front. Not a surprise it based off the impreza and no other car I can think of since honda in the early 2000's has had full double wishbones. It will still handle well, but you can't say anything with macpherson on the front handles supreme. Macpherson has no dynamic camber control.

The weight remains to be seen. One of the reasons I keep up on news is because it might be lightweight.

The current boxer is not that old. Subaru just released a new boxer with DI, fancy cooling and other things and it only gets 10% better mileage with the same power output. This is the engine they release 2 weeks ago.

Subaru had one 2L engine that made about 180hp, but it was only released in japan. Hey if they want to develop a one off engine for the ft-86 I'm all for it, but the car is supposed to be cheap too.

If they would just hurry up and release the damn car we could compare it to other cars, but until then it's all speculation.
overvolting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 06:19 AM   #16
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,057
Thanks: 7,733
Thanked 19,285 Times in 8,392 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)


I`ll be just out here on the bench enjoy this thread.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 06:49 AM   #17
[es vi: eks]
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: Subaru Legacy
Location: NZ, Christchurch, The Shakey Isles
Posts: 322
Thanks: 41
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by overvolting View Post
The current boxer is not that old. Subaru just released a new boxer with DI, fancy cooling and other things and it only gets 10% better mileage with the same power output. This is the engine they release 2 weeks ago.
Actually I beleave the new Gen FB20 engine is still yet to be fitted with DI. If you look at the Pictures it is still only has MPFI.

So far the FT86 Will only get D4-S
[es vi: eks] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 07:00 AM   #18
Snaps
Supra Owner
 
Snaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: 1995 Toyota Supra UK Spec
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^ 'Only' D4-S?

D4-S is better than both Direct Injection and Port injection... Because it's a combination of the two.
__________________
Snaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 07:12 AM   #19
[es vi: eks]
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: Subaru Legacy
Location: NZ, Christchurch, The Shakey Isles
Posts: 322
Thanks: 41
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I like the Concept of D4-S. Vast improvement over just using DI. Best of both worlds.
The new Subaru block still looks like it uses MPFI.
So if thats the case you can get even better fuel eccommony and power out of the new Gen FB20. So more than the 10% increase that subaru says for there engine.
[es vi: eks] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 07:25 AM   #20
70NYD
Senior Member
 
70NYD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: RX8 S1
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
lol itchi join in u make some of the best posts ahhaha
please do show the pic with macpherson up front (remember just cus the spring and shock is in one package doesnt mean its macpherson or chapman strut.. it has to be PHYSICALLY attached to the wheel DIRCTLY in a FIXED manner, with more than ONE bolt to be a macpherson/chapman) so PROOF PLEASE cus thats news to me..

and learn what D4-S is b4 commenting on it..
also this isnt a subaru engine.. its a subaru block with toyota/yamaha heads.. will more than likely have vvtl-i or the new valvetronic controll.
__________________
70NYD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 07:56 AM   #21
Snaps
Supra Owner
 
Snaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: 1995 Toyota Supra UK Spec
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^ It's valvematic

But I would guess if Toyota included valvematic and D4-S (confirmed already for D4-S?) then this engine should make over 200hp N/A, but only if Toyota tunes it for performance over economy.

I very much doubt this will be MacPherson strut, I think it will most likely be double wishbone.
__________________
Snaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 10:10 AM   #22
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by overvolting View Post
You people are out of your ever lovin minds.
First off, look at the subaru 2.5L boxer, it puts out 165hp at the crank.
You make cheap cars with off the shelf parts.
Only way it's going to be 200hp is with a turbo.

Second, they've never released the weight, they don't even have a final production version, how on earth you think it's going to be sub 2700lb which is the weight of the old 1990's civics and integras, I do not know. But either way it remains to be seen.

3rd, It doesn't even have front double wishbone, so supreme handling is out of the question. Also, it's not mid-engined so supreme balance is also out of the question.

I hope they release the damn thing soon so you people can come back to reality. Seems like you think this thing is going to set some nurburgring records or something.

How about you get back in your little fwd Honda and roll the fuck on out of here?

The current batch of Subaru boxers aren't built for NA performance. This is why Toyota is redoing the head, with their own technology. Even if they didn't, There is one example, that shows it can be done and It makes 197ps. Check around next time before you come on here and spout rubbish.

With respect to the weight, have you seen how much a Miata weighs? Have you seen the size of this car? Actually, I think this is the one area where Toyota can properly balls this up, so I'm tempering my expectations, but lightweight is a focus of this car, and anything more than 2650-2700lbs in my book will be fail.

Next, I know it has McPhersons up front. I never claimed any different. That statement expressed the desire of another poster, not a claimed fact. Front double wishbones are not a necessity for supreme handling, ask BMW and their entire line of 3 series sedans & coupes, including the M3s.

Lastly, mid engined cars are usually rear weight biased, and while imo that is truly where the engine belongs, is not for inexperienced drivers. Trust me, I've ditched enough MR2s to know this. The boxer will be FMR (mid as in between the axles, but in front of the driver), some of the advantages of a regular MR, but without the disadvantage of being rear weight biased (as most MR cars are, around 42/58 to 45/55), and without the weight of the engine over the rear wheels making for the entertaining phenomenon known as snap oversteer. Hopefully it will have 50/50 or close to it, dynamic weight distribution (as in when the car is moving), or at least 50/50 static distribution to keep people like you who don't know anything happy.

Nobody is expecting this car to set any ring records or anything of the sort. We just want it to be quick, reliable, economical and FUN, with the ability to be modded to ones taste, and if you can't grasp that, you don't get this car nor 90% of the people who are here on this board.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 11:21 AM   #23
70NYD
Senior Member
 
70NYD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: RX8 S1
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
valvematic thats right i keep mixing it up with the bmw one haha
matadore, i missed where it was said it will have macphersons up front.. do u have a linky
__________________
70NYD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 11:55 AM   #24
Midship Runabout
formerly Dixie Normous
 
Midship Runabout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: The ladies wild!
Location: ())_)CRAYOLA)_))>
Posts: 996
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70NYD View Post
matadore, i missed where it was said it will have macphersons up front.. do u have a linky
Had this thread awhile ago... All speculation from us, but still good stuff.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...alk+suspension
Midship Runabout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 12:29 PM   #25
nate89
Senior Member
 
nate89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: MR2
Location: USA!!!
Posts: 256
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
nate89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 03:50 PM   #26
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70NYD View Post
valvematic thats right i keep mixing it up with the bmw one haha
matadore, i missed where it was said it will have macphersons up front.. do u have a linky
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=251
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 04:18 PM   #27
Dark
Elite Padawan
 
Dark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: '15 WRX, 15 GLA250, and 2 feet
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 3,498
Thanks: 197
Thanked 250 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think New gen boxer doesn't equip with DI yet. How the he** is this guy claiming it is?
I didn't know about suspension tho.
Dark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 07:22 PM   #28
Snaps
Supra Owner
 
Snaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: 1995 Toyota Supra UK Spec
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
That does say struts up front.... But it also says 1000kg...

Just sayin'.
__________________
Snaps is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.