OFT v2.06 Non-Beta

[Shiv@Openflash]

Originally Posted by troek

ok, heres a log with the newest tune, ive never been able to realy log flkc before, so maybe ive always had this and never noticed. but theres over -1.0 flkc at top. maybe my afr is too lean? or is this small enough to not worry about. everything else seems perfect.
http://datazap.me/u/troek/v206-pull-...-4-5-6-7-10-12

That amount of knock retard is not really much to worry about. But you can always load the 91oct version of the map instead if you want it completely gone. There is no problem with running the 91oct map on 93oct fuel. If i had my way, I wouldn't even have labeled the two map options 91oct and 93oct. But rather "standard" and "aggressive".

[troek]

Originally Posted by Shiv@Openflash

That amount of knock retard is not really much to worry about. But you can always load the 91oct version of the map instead if you want it completely gone. There is no problem with running the 91oct map on 93oct fuel. If i had my way, I wouldn't even have labeled the two map options 91oct and 93oct. But rather "standard" and "aggressive".

i may try rescale the maf to get the afr down a bit, or would that not affect it?

[steve99]

Originally Posted by troek

i may try rescale the maf to get the afr down a bit, or would that not affect it?

Mate if it was me i would not touch the MAF scaling it looks spot on 0.7% and 0% throughout rpm range and 2% at idle.

If you want to make it richer/leaner adjust the values in the Primary Open Loop Fuel Table.

or even safer just have a read of the knock correction thread below first post and just pull about half the knock correction amounts from the BASE TIMING B table at the rpm load points where their is knock. If you can get it back to -0.6 or less that fine. Then maybe tweek the IAT vs Ignition retard table to make it slightly more aggressive for hot track days and mabe look at the Engine coolant vs retard for a bit of extra safety.

[troek]

good info steve

[Annahra]

Originally Posted by Shiv@Openflash

If i had my way, I wouldn't even have labeled the two map options 91oct and 93oct. But rather "standard" and "aggressive".

So if we want to be as safe as possible, should we stick with the 91 oct tune over the 93, even with access to 93?

[zc06_kisstherain]

@Shiv@Openflash,

Shiv, I had chance to datalog 2 runs. would you please take a look at it and i am good?
http://www.datazap.me/u/zc06kissther...ta=1-6-7-11-12

Thanks

[Simon99]

Question for you @Shiv@Openflash , I see a Mac OSX folder, does that mean your OFM nows runs in native mac environement or we still need bootcamp ?

[s2d4]

Originally Posted by Annahra

So if we want to be as safe as possible, should we stick with the 91 oct tune over the 93, even with access to 93?

Yes.

[s2d4]

Originally Posted by Simon99

Question for you @Shiv@Openflash , I see a Mac OSX folder, does that mean your OFM nows runs in native mac environement or we still need bootcamp ?

Virtual machines works fine, no need for boot camp.

He may have just used MAC to do the tune files folder filing.

[Simon99]

Originally Posted by s2d4

Virtual machines works fine, no need for boot camp.

He may have just used MAC to do the tune files folder filing.

Im a new mac user and cant seem to run anything in VM, im used to windows evironement for 19 years soswitching over to mac is quite different

[s2d4]

Originally Posted by Simon99

Im a new mac user and cant seem to run anything in VM, im used to windows evironement for 19 years soswitching over to mac is quite different

You can install windows inside VM so windows environment would be exactly what you get. Plug a usb device, it would ask if it wants to connect to mac or VM (windows) so choose VM, done. OFT connected to OFM in windows and inside VM whilst MAC OS still running.
23 years of windows here, granted mostly for work for the last 8 years.

[akyp]

Originally Posted by troek

i may try rescale the maf to get the afr down a bit, or would that not affect it?

Your LTFT looks far better than mine: http://datazap.me/u/akyp/20140918-a00g-01

Maybe I should do the MAF scaling.

[troek]

Yeah, steve's how to is brilliant. Its pretty east to follow.

[KonTheory]

Originally Posted by steve99

Im not supprised it bogged down on 17x9 wheels with nitto tyres thats serious rubber on a basicly stock car.

check the mod list in his signiture..... lol

I figured maybe the revs werent high enough, in which case do you know how to raise the rev limiter for the OFT, 5800 doesnt seem high enough... lol