follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

View Poll Results: Have you blown your stock motor with boost?
Yes complete failure needs rebuild 32 5.39%
No been boosting and running strong 188 31.65%
Nope because I am not boosting my motor 374 62.96%
Voters: 594. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2014, 10:31 PM   #281
Kiske
Senior Member
 
Kiske's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: RX-7 / BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 2,349
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,081 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Tut View Post
So I guess I decided to compile the list today:

If anyone knows of any others, please post them up.
Anychance you could add the aprox hp/torq and/or psi (even if a guess) around the time of detonation? From what I'm reading it seems like everyone here was pushing the car 350+ or rather high.
__________________
//2013 World Rally Blue BRZ Limited FBM Turbo--gone
//2018 Crystal White Pearl BRZ Ts 2.2l Harrop Supercharged
Kiske is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 02:42 AM   #282
Cal3000
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Panda FR-S
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 531
Thanks: 297
Thanked 377 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If it makes anyone feel better, I'm at 40k boosted miles @330whp dynojet Flex Fuel e85. No catch can, no oil cooler.
63k miles on the motor
__________________
Vortech SC on 9psi Pulley, Invidia Catless Front Pipe, Invidia N1 Catback Exhaust
242whp/197ft-lb on Mustang Dyno (91 octane water)
284whp/223ft-lb on Mustang Dyno (E85)
Delicious Tuning
Cal3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cal3000 For This Useful Post:
D K (08-12-2014), midnight23 (08-19-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 03:23 AM   #283
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal3000 View Post
If it makes anyone feel better, I'm at 40k boosted miles @330whp dynojet Flex Fuel e85. No catch can, no oil cooler.
63k miles on the motor
any track miles?
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2014, 02:00 AM   #284
Cal3000
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Panda FR-S
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 531
Thanks: 297
Thanked 377 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
any track miles?
None at all. lol. But it is driven hard just about everyday.
__________________
Vortech SC on 9psi Pulley, Invidia Catless Front Pipe, Invidia N1 Catback Exhaust
242whp/197ft-lb on Mustang Dyno (91 octane water)
284whp/223ft-lb on Mustang Dyno (E85)
Delicious Tuning
Cal3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 02:41 AM   #285
AZFA20
Automotive Connoisseur
 
AZFA20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: too many cars
Location: The Desert, AZ
Posts: 629
Thanks: 156
Thanked 517 Times in 257 Posts
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Engines coming out tomorrow. Still runs but developed what sounds like a rod knock seconds after throwing a cam CEL. Was only doing about 45mph not in boost. I was actually doing cam function diagnosis when it failed. Literally just finished putting an engine in another FR-S yesterday that had catastrophic failure in cylinder #1 too haha. Sadly I am getting very fast at pulling FA20s and rebuilding them.
__________________
LSx Powered 86/ASE Master Certified Automotive Technician
AZFA20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 11:54 AM   #286
raytrix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: Series 10 FR-S
Location: Chicago
Posts: 480
Thanks: 234
Thanked 380 Times in 151 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal3000 View Post
If it makes anyone feel better, I'm at 40k boosted miles @330whp dynojet Flex Fuel e85. No catch can, no oil cooler.
63k miles on the motor
How many miles was not boosted?
raytrix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 01:00 PM   #287
TemeCal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86
Location: US
Posts: 686
Thanks: 377
Thanked 303 Times in 181 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by raytrix View Post
How many miles was not boosted?
63k (total) - 40k (boosted) = 23k (NA)
TemeCal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TemeCal For This Useful Post:
Cal3000 (08-22-2014), hmong337 (09-26-2014), raytrix (08-20-2014), ShadowReaper (10-24-2017), Travisty75 (08-20-2014)
Old 08-20-2014, 03:23 PM   #288
raytrix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: Series 10 FR-S
Location: Chicago
Posts: 480
Thanks: 234
Thanked 380 Times in 151 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TemeCal View Post
63k (total) - 40k (boosted) = 23k (NA)
That's quite a good amount boosted. Not bad.
raytrix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 10:22 PM   #289
Astroboy
Senior Member
 
Astroboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: None
Location: Tx
Posts: 1,271
Thanks: 1,269
Thanked 142 Times in 122 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal3000 View Post
If it makes anyone feel better, I'm at 40k boosted miles @330whp dynojet Flex Fuel e85. No catch can, no oil cooler.
63k miles on the motor

What kit?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Astroboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 11:22 PM   #290
cdrazic93
Junior
 
cdrazic93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: a car
Location: Probably at school
Posts: 4,341
Thanks: 3,184
Thanked 2,512 Times in 1,502 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZFA20 View Post
Engines coming out tomorrow. Still runs but developed what sounds like a rod knock seconds after throwing a cam CEL. Was only doing about 45mph not in boost. I was actually doing cam function diagnosis when it failed. Literally just finished putting an engine in another FR-S yesterday that had catastrophic failure in cylinder #1 too haha. Sadly I am getting very fast at pulling FA20s and rebuilding them.
So if you've repaired a decent # of them, what would you say is a leading cause of the extravagant rod knock? Is it the bad VVT design or is it a part that's just not holding up to what it should be?
__________________
"Ah! What music! They could have never imagined, those pioneers who invented the automobile, that it would posses us like this, our imaginations, our dreams. Men love women, but even more than that, men love CARS!"-Lord Hesketh
cdrazic93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 03:37 AM   #291
AZFA20
Automotive Connoisseur
 
AZFA20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: too many cars
Location: The Desert, AZ
Posts: 629
Thanks: 156
Thanked 517 Times in 257 Posts
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdrazic93 View Post
So if you've repaired a decent # of them, what would you say is a leading cause of the extravagant rod knock? Is it the bad VVT design or is it a part that's just not holding up to what it should be?
Well this particular instance I think was just coincidence more than anything that the cam CEL came on seconds before hand. The engine is out and stripped on an engine stand but I didn't have time today to completely disassemble it to see all the dirty details yet. I can say that it is cylinder 3 & 4 rod bearings on this one and since there is a significant amount of bearing material in the pan it's pretty likely the bank 1 actuators are now full of bearing material too resulting in the cam CEL for bank 1, just before audible failure. Tomorrow I will know whether the crank journals survived or not.

The bearing failures are most likely just a result of an inadequate oiling system and oil distribution design on this particular engine for anything more than stock-300whp ish. The oil pressures are pretty damn low at the mains and rods especially compounded with heat. AZ's temp is hot so no secret that we have to overcome higher than average conditions in the summer months. When the pressures are low and the compression forces are much higher with boosted power, the more likely you are to collapse the hydrodymanic oil film and crush the oil wedge in the bearings. This is followed by metal on metal bearing to journal contact. Unfortunately there really isn't any affordable option to combat the oiling issue at this time that I am aware of unless you convert to full blown dry sump which again is not really practical for an 86 that is not a dedicated race car. I may personally implement an Accusump but even that is not the best option for a daily driver.

The previous engine I was working on before this was most certainly piston failure in the wrist pin area which then resulted in a broken rod and then total cylinder destruction. It's difficult to say for sure though because the piston is in literally a million pieces. Total block loss

Prior to that engine was another rod bearing failure that then took the rest of that piston assembly with it, total block loss.

Prior to that one was rod failure, again total block loss.

As you can see they seem to exhibit different failure points but most are catastrophic failure. I got super lucky with mine.

I still have some of these engine guts laying around so if you guys want I can take pictures. Oh and I have had 2 now that have come in that also tossed the rockers/followers. The one that had a piston failure tossed 4 of them, 2 on each bank to be specific. This was a second hand result I believe of the piston failure though causing erratic crank rotation for a split second in addition to having weak stock valve springs. The other I think just from floating the valves with too much boost for stock spring pressures.

I wish there was more of a pattern though. Something I did notice on my own was irregular or deformed DI seals which will be replaced. Totally unrelated to the failure but noticed none the less during disassembly. It wasn't having an effect on the engine yet but I imagine over time they would have worsened. This is even after living on the revised ROMs since they were first implemented. All of these engines have also been <25k.
__________________
LSx Powered 86/ASE Master Certified Automotive Technician
AZFA20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 03:56 AM   #292
cdrazic93
Junior
 
cdrazic93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: a car
Location: Probably at school
Posts: 4,341
Thanks: 3,184
Thanked 2,512 Times in 1,502 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZFA20 View Post
The bearing failures are most likely just a result of an inadequate oiling system and oil distribution design on this particular engine for anything more than stock-300whp ish. The oil pressures are pretty damn low at the mains and rods especially compounded with heat. AZ's temp is hot so no secret that we have to overcome higher than average conditions in the summer months. When the pressures are low and the compression forces are much higher with boosted power, the more likely you are to collapse the hydrodymanic oil film and crush the oil wedge in the bearings. This is followed by metal on metal bearing to journal contact. Unfortunately there really isn't any affordable option to combat the oiling issue at this time that I am aware of unless you convert to full blown dry sump which again is not really practical for an 86 that is not a dedicated race car. I may personally implement an Accusump but even that is not the best option for a daily driver.

I still have some of these engine guts laying around so if you guys want I can take pictures.

Were those engine owners using oil coolers and a thicker oil weight? Usually larger oil pans, a tad bit thicker weight and the cooler should do enough to keep the viscosity at a decent PSI level in those bearings. Hopefully. If it's not then there's an inadiquate oiling system that needs to be addressed ASAP by MAP or FBM or someone.

Oh and P.S. Everyone loves pictures of blown up car pistons
__________________
"Ah! What music! They could have never imagined, those pioneers who invented the automobile, that it would posses us like this, our imaginations, our dreams. Men love women, but even more than that, men love CARS!"-Lord Hesketh
cdrazic93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 04:15 AM   #293
AZFA20
Automotive Connoisseur
 
AZFA20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: too many cars
Location: The Desert, AZ
Posts: 629
Thanks: 156
Thanked 517 Times in 257 Posts
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdrazic93 View Post
Were those engine owners using oil coolers and a thicker oil weight? Usually larger oil pans, a tad bit thicker weight and the cooler should do enough to keep the viscosity at a decent PSI level in those bearings. Hopefully. If it's not then there's an inadiquate oiling system that needs to be addressed ASAP by MAP or FBM or someone.

Oh and P.S. Everyone loves pictures of blown up car pistons
Yep oil coolers were in use. Element Tuning is the only one I know of who is actively working through this oiling issue and as of today has shown positive results from some proprietary internal modifications and the use of an Accusump. They are now moving on to a dry sump system as well.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63723
__________________
LSx Powered 86/ASE Master Certified Automotive Technician
AZFA20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 04:19 AM   #294
cdrazic93
Junior
 
cdrazic93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: a car
Location: Probably at school
Posts: 4,341
Thanks: 3,184
Thanked 2,512 Times in 1,502 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZFA20 View Post
Yep oil coolers were in use. Element Tuning is the only one I know of who is actively working through this oiling issue and as of today has shown positive results from some proprietary internal modifications and the use of an Accusump. They are now moving on to a dry sump system as well.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63723
What does the accusump actually fix? Or is it more of a bandaid?
__________________
"Ah! What music! They could have never imagined, those pioneers who invented the automobile, that it would posses us like this, our imaginations, our dreams. Men love women, but even more than that, men love CARS!"-Lord Hesketh
cdrazic93 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much HP can the stock motor handle? FullTuneZN6 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 34 11-16-2017 02:22 AM
Full Blown 521hp Stock Motor @ 20psi FullBlown Forced Induction 276 08-31-2016 03:05 AM
FBM 604Hp 472Tq -- Stock Motor Stage 2 Turbo Kit FullBlown Forced Induction 414 07-14-2014 10:52 PM
FRS300 Rebuild Has Begun..Blown Motor to Built Monster FA20Club.com Forced Induction 917 10-20-2013 07:26 AM
Highest HP on stock motor using only 93/94 octane? hmong337 Forced Induction 11 09-09-2013 11:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.