follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-10-2014, 06:38 PM   #253
imag
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 1965 Datsun Roadster
Location: United States
Posts: 84
Thanks: 22
Thanked 99 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
More like, he wanted something current owner can update, instead of leaving them & getting screwed
Oh, come on. They announce an update where they thickened the flange on a couple of bolts and added paint colors. Then they say, "we were just trying to make sure that existing owners can 'upgrade'!" That's some pretty serious spin on what amounts to a tiny revision.

That said, they were probably right to do it this way. In all my time on various car boards, I have never seen such a petty bunch of owners. When other cars gets updated, most people on the boards celebrate. On here, everyone seems panicked that they would actually improve anything. I cannot believe that there are people on here wanting the car to fail and get canceled so they can feel special about theirs. It's crazy.
imag is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to imag For This Useful Post:
Bristecom (04-11-2014), leapoffaith_initial-d_frs (04-12-2014), Quentin (04-11-2014), strat61caster (04-10-2014)
Old 04-10-2014, 06:40 PM   #254
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,058
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 19,285 Times in 8,392 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by imag View Post
Oh, come on. They announce an update where they thickened the flange on a couple of bolts and added paint colors. Then they say, "we were just trying to make sure that existing owners can 'upgrade'!" That's some pretty serious spin on what amounts to a tiny revision.



That said, they were probably right to do it this way. In all my time on various car boards, I have never seen such a petty bunch of owners. When other cars gets updated, most people on the boards celebrate. On here, everyone seems panicked that they would actually improve anything. I cannot believe that there are people on here wanting the car to fail and get canceled so they can feel special about theirs. It's crazy.

I guess, you never around the S2k forum when they announced AP2. F'ck that was war zone lol


Sent from my mighty mind
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ichitaka05 For This Useful Post:
AznKirby (04-10-2014)
Old 04-11-2014, 05:24 AM   #255
imag
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 1965 Datsun Roadster
Location: United States
Posts: 84
Thanks: 22
Thanked 99 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
I guess, you never around the S2k forum when they announced AP2. F'ck that was war zone lol


Sent from my mighty mind
Funny. The AP1 was the better sports car.
imag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 06:02 AM   #256
regal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S/Toyota Yaris
Location: PA
Posts: 1,438
Thanks: 21
Thanked 316 Times in 232 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bristecom View Post
I don't want to buy it until it's reliable enough at the very least. I can't afford to have my car sitting at the dealership for weeks being repaired like many others on here have.
I agree, leaving the car at the dealership overnight is impossible for me and they have the nerve to say if your car doesn't have the idle problem you describe you have to pay $40. I'm used to getting a reental for warranty work. So I ordered a tatrix and need to figure out ecuflash just to get my car the latest factory calib. PITA

Quote:
Originally Posted by imag View Post
Funny. The AP1 was the better sports car.
So true many don't realize this.


As far as Tada saying they won't make major upgrades because owners will become disgruntled, that's obvious marketing bs if he really said it. Automakers exist to make money if a more powerful engine that meets all regs/requirements would spur a profit, believe me they would do it regardless if those of us with the FA20 would be sad.
__________________
2013 FRS Argento Silver 6MT

Mods:
Clear fender side lights
Tactrix ZA1JB01C 2014 Calib
regal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to regal For This Useful Post:
Bristecom (04-11-2014)
Old 04-11-2014, 06:06 PM   #257
Boxer486
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: small
Location: here
Posts: 697
Thanks: 195
Thanked 263 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
So I don't get the idea of the revised suspension tuning being something current owners would do. I take it these aren't the Sach's dampers Toyota was testing are they? I know the wheels look like the prototype 18" BBS wheels they were using. Those had staggered tires if I recall too.

If these are the Sachs dampers then I could see the appeal. Otherwise people would just get coilovers or springs.

I really want these bolts ASAP, anyone have part#'s yet?
Boxer486 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 02:59 AM   #258
AznKirby
Are you 20/20?
 
AznKirby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: Hopes and dreams
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 715
Thanked 1,310 Times in 703 Posts
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by imag View Post
Funny. The AP1 was the better sports car.
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal View Post
So true many don't realize this.
A little side-tracked from the thread, but

I hope you're not saying that because of the higher revving engine.
__________________
2014 FR-S Monogram
2005 Acura RSX Type-S

IG: @MonKehC
AznKirby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 06:23 AM   #259
reni
Nobody beats the B[I|R]Z
 
reni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: shopping cart i stole from walmart
Location: somewhere
Posts: 939
Thanks: 262
Thanked 1,145 Times in 456 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AznKirby View Post
A little side-tracked from the thread, but

I hope you're not saying that because of the higher revving engine.
they're saying it because it's the popular thing to say for internet racers
reni is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to reni For This Useful Post:
Bristecom (04-13-2014)
Old 04-12-2014, 10:08 PM   #260
AznKirby
Are you 20/20?
 
AznKirby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: Hopes and dreams
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 715
Thanked 1,310 Times in 703 Posts
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by reni View Post
they're saying it because it's the popular thing to say for internet racers
I should've known
__________________
2014 FR-S Monogram
2005 Acura RSX Type-S

IG: @MonKehC
AznKirby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 04:41 PM   #261
imag
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 1965 Datsun Roadster
Location: United States
Posts: 84
Thanks: 22
Thanked 99 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by reni View Post
they're saying it because it's the popular thing to say for internet racers
No, it's because I have one family member who has owned an AP1 from new, and one who owned an AP2. I have driven both on the track and on the same stretch of twisties, and I much prefer the AP1. Most enthusiasts prefer the AP1 because:

1. The S2K is all about the high revving motor. The car had the highest specific output of any naturally aspirated standard production car of its time. 8000 rpm is a lot less interesting. That motor opens its lungs up at 6K rpm, so the extra 1000 rpm of range really does make a difference in spirited driving.

2. The chassis tuning for the AP1 was better. They took it down a notch in the revision to give it "safe" understeer. That worsens the car, in my opinion.

What's with the nasty derisive comment, anyway? Why do people have to denigrate the opinions of others based on almost no information about them? Next time, if you disagree, you might try providing information supporting your point of view. Quit trying to ascribe motives to others; you are not much good at it.
imag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 04:57 PM   #262
AznKirby
Are you 20/20?
 
AznKirby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: Hopes and dreams
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 715
Thanked 1,310 Times in 703 Posts
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
A higher revving motor does not mean anything when that motor stop making power above a certain amount of RPMs.
The F22c1 had a lower redline, but made more power/torque than the F20c, better gear ratios, looks better (subjective). Also, I thought I read somewhere that the reason why they revised the engine was because people kept blowing it up.

I'm just saying - it's a popular thing to say that you prefer the AP1. I just never understood why.
__________________
2014 FR-S Monogram
2005 Acura RSX Type-S

IG: @MonKehC
AznKirby is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AznKirby For This Useful Post:
Bristecom (04-13-2014)
Old 04-16-2014, 06:17 AM   #263
Guillaume
Senior Member
 
Guillaume's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Exige S 240
Location: Belgium
Posts: 732
Thanks: 319
Thanked 602 Times in 287 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FiRStsc10n View Post

I also saw in a 2015 BRZ thread that Ice Silver Metallic was announced.
-----

In addition from article ichitaka05 posted:

"June 2 was partially improved the "86". Improvements up to the improved ride comfort and handling stability"

New bolts are available for those already with vehicle to purchase. Approx cost 1000 yen. These bolts improve body rigidity.

"And this time for that specifically described by increasing the binding rigidity by thickening the flange portion of the bolt, the "adopted a method of controlling the body rigidity. Front suspension members, users get on well, have altered the. Bolts if you replace it if I have purchased Toyota parts Kyohan this bolt, which enables control of rigid body 86 of the "current of rear absorber This the mounting portion, a "feel able to be around 1000 yen after replacing all. ride changes clearly in a normal person. Also by "body rigidity is increased, suspension settings as well because you will need of course, was also improved shock absorber" (Google Translation)

Do we already have a part number available for these improved bits and pieces (bolts, but also shocks, etc.)?
Guillaume is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Guillaume For This Useful Post:
Boxer486 (04-16-2014), DanielC (04-16-2014)
Old 04-16-2014, 12:58 PM   #264
regal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S/Toyota Yaris
Location: PA
Posts: 1,438
Thanks: 21
Thanked 316 Times in 232 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AznKirby View Post
A higher revving motor does not mean anything when that motor stop making power above a certain amount of RPMs.
The F22c1 had a lower redline, but made more power/torque than the F20c, better gear ratios, looks better (subjective). Also, I thought I read somewhere that the reason why they revised the engine was because people kept blowing it up.

I'm just saying - it's a popular thing to say that you prefer the AP1. I just never understood why.


But you're not getting it, in a sports car high reving is part of the definition. The AP1 set a bar that will never be brocen (except rotaries.) Its a mystique thing. Like a boxer rumble.


With no real talks of switching to DIT and the BMW collarbaration obviously in the forefront, you sort of get the feeling that 2015 may be it for the twins.


The chassis will probably resurface as a 4 door sedan at some point. But its it feels like Toyota has lost interest in the car. Maybe the Germans told them to back off or else, as a DIT twin will destroy a Cayman
__________________
2013 FRS Argento Silver 6MT

Mods:
Clear fender side lights
Tactrix ZA1JB01C 2014 Calib
regal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2014, 03:16 PM   #265
imag
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 1965 Datsun Roadster
Location: United States
Posts: 84
Thanks: 22
Thanked 99 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Pretty lame:

http://pressroom.scion.com/releases/...ase+series.htm

This car was supposed to be for true sports car fans. Instead, the "upgrades" are built for posers. Four exhaust tips (for 200 horsepower!) and the body kit weigh the car down more than they add speed. I'm sorry, but it's BS.
imag is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to imag For This Useful Post:
gt8613 (05-10-2014), suaveflooder (05-10-2014)
Old 04-16-2014, 03:26 PM   #266
imag
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 1965 Datsun Roadster
Location: United States
Posts: 84
Thanks: 22
Thanked 99 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal View Post
With no real talks of switching to DIT and the BMW collarbaration obviously in the forefront, you sort of get the feeling that 2015 may be it for the twins.
I will give 100:1 odds that that is not true. There is no reason for them to discontinue it. They will do a refresh at 3 years for 2016, and I have no doubt that it will add at least some power. I expect that they will also do an "R1" style package in the last years.

I was just hoping that they would realize that a real special edition would sell now. A vain hope, as it turned out.
imag is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to change the start up screen on 2014 head unit? Choob Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 9 08-03-2014 06:24 PM
2014 ORDER CUTOFF & 2015 START-UP DATES botbs BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 22 03-12-2014 02:24 AM
2014 - 2015 Colors RojerLockless Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 16 01-03-2014 01:08 AM
Official: 2014 FR-S Production Starts August for September Retail Release 5AD86D Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 101 08-03-2013 03:51 PM
Should one wait for the 2014/2015 model? jimmillion Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 132 02-29-2012 03:42 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.