Nameless Performance Equal Length Stepped Header

[OrbitalEllipses]

Originally Posted by SmsAlSuwaidi

Plan was sti, but a few people did not recommend them. Cusco have high NVH. So i guess Perrin is the only choice


Sent from my IBrick

Maybe if you drop the clutch everyday I wouldn't recommend the STI ones, but otherwise the other two are lackluster for street driven cars. Though you didn't want cats either, so perhaps you and I have different ideas on street-driven.

[SmsAlSuwaidi]

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses

Maybe if you drop the clutch everyday I wouldn't recommend the STI ones, but otherwise the other two are lackluster for street driven cars. Though you didn't want cats either, so perhaps you and I have different ideas on street-driven.

Its going to be useless to dump the clutch on this car with over 300whp, all thats gona happen is spin spin spin.

Meh only reason i want to get rid of that cat is to chase power, hell maybe do a before and after dyno if i do do it


Sent from my IBrick

[Victor Draken]

what's the purpose of engine mounts?

[StormTrooper]

Originally Posted by Victor Draken

what's the purpose of engine mounts?

Stiffer ones will lessen the movement of the engine during hard acceleration

[Victor Draken]

Originally Posted by StormTrooper

Stiffer ones will lessen the movement of the engine during hard acceleration

and give what? more stiffness to the body chassis?

[Calum]

Originally Posted by Victor Draken

what's the purpose of engine mounts?

Originally Posted by Victor Draken

and give what? more stiffness to the body chassis?

The purpose of engine mounts is to mount the engine to the car. Without them, the engine would turn and the car wouldn't move. Stiffer mounts will transmit more vibrations, but will keep the motor from moving around as much.

[FrsDuke]

When did this turn into a front pipe and engine mount thread?

[MidnightRunner]

Originally Posted by FrsDuke

When did this turn into a front pipe and engine mount thread?

Since there's Jack shit on the header, we have to talk about SOMETHING

Sent from my LG-P769 using Tapatalk

[Hawaiian]

Originally Posted by 14BRZ

Didn't your BRZ baseline a lot higher than normal? Like a 183whp, 151wtq stock? I would imagine with those stock numbers that it would make more power than another full exhaust setup with just your headers, and a solid month of tuning.

Edit: Sorry 172whp 143wtq after dynojet correction. Still higher than 90% of the baseline dynos I have seen. Cant really judge it by that, we will only be able to tell by the gains it makes over what your stock BRZ produced. Have you started building the batches yet? Its nearing the end of the month and i'm sure you have access to that information.

I wonder what kind of results my tuner could get with a full months worth of tuning my setup.

[OrbitalEllipses]

Originally Posted by Hawaiian

I wonder what kind of results my tuner could get with a full months worth of tuning my setup.

THIS is why you catch flack. Posts like this.

We know the dynos have been missing for a month. You already have a header. See where I'm going with this?

[Hawaiian]

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses

THIS is why you catch flack. Posts like this.

We know the dynos have been missing for a month. You already have a header. See where I'm going with this?

It was a reasonable question, I actually am curious. It's not like there's much more going on... just talk about mounts and other exhaust parts.

I think you would be the last person to instruct others on flack catching comments.

[StormTrooper]

Hahaha.....yeah i'm not sure how a week turned into a month.

Results for the jdl EL v.2 should be out soon.

Would love to see an EL shootout with hks jdl and nameless......which $1100/1200 header is king.

[14BRZ]

According to Nameless, their header alone blows full exhaust systems out of the water. Maybe their V2 will make insane crazy unreal NA power if they never post results!

[OrbitalEllipses]

Originally Posted by Hawaiian

I think you would be the last person to instruct others on flack catching comments.

I never question why I get flack, whereas you did several pages go. Just trying to show you how others may see you. And whether or not it was a legitimate question, it was the way in which you worded the statement (and then I interpreted).

see self image:

Self-image may consist of three types:

• Self-image resulting from how the individual sees himself or herself.
• Self-image resulting from how others see the individual.
• Self-image resulting from how the individual perceives others see him or her.

These three types may or may not be an accurate representation of the person. All, some or none of them may be true.