follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-10-2014, 05:58 PM   #183
Kelbyat07
Poor College Kid
 
Kelbyat07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: ~.~
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,801
Thanks: 246
Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,249 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirBrass View Post
Same. I wasn't happy in an STI, so I'd be absolutely miserable in a Civic SI wagon.

They'll have to take my BRZ from my cold, dead hands.
Im glad i made the right decision by buying one of the twins!
__________________

Kelbyat07 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kelbyat07 For This Useful Post:
SirBrass (01-10-2014)
Old 01-10-2014, 07:31 PM   #184
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,890 Times in 2,903 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dskater411 View Post
Everyone bashing the civic is just trying to feel better about themselves with their own car. The SI is a great little car. I had a 2008 SI two cars ago, now I have a 2014 BRZ. Each have their selling points. I do like the BRZ more, but it is also newer. FWD really isnt much of a limitation for the civic, just watch this video


Car comparisons on different tire compounds is like comparing apples to oranges.
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 07:46 PM   #185
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses View Post


Car comparisons on different tire compounds is like comparing apples to oranges.
just like comparing cars with different drivetrains or numbers of doors. cars as a whole are consumable so its a little bit of a slippery slope to just arbitrarily change things. a stock comparison is a stock comparison. take it for what its worth.

i never really understand why people say you cant compare apples to oranges. you compare things because they are different. not because they are the same.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 07:48 PM   #186
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,890 Times in 2,903 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
just like comparing cars with different drivetrains or numbers of doors. cars as a whole are consumable so its a little bit of a slippery slope to just arbitrarily change things. a stock comparison is a stock comparison. take it for what its worth.

i never really understand why people say you cant compare apples to oranges. you compare things because they are different. not because they are the same.
Bolt part is completely invalid. The point regarding tires is that they are the ONLY thing keeping the car sticking to the road and a different compound will DRASTICALLY alter times. Put two different cars on the SAME tire and you're comparing what the CARS do and not what the TIRES do.
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 08:45 PM   #187
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses View Post
Bolt part is completely invalid. The point regarding tires is that they are the ONLY thing keeping the car sticking to the road and a different compound will DRASTICALLY alter times. Put two different cars on the SAME tire and you're comparing what the CARS do and not what the TIRES do.
i get what tires do. they are part of the car. its a stock comparison just like most comparisons. youre more than welcome to change the tires and test them both in your comparison. thats not a comparison of the cars stock though.

ive had this conversation before and i know it goes in circles but ill bow out with this thought: tires cost money and vary not only from model to model but size to size so its still not an "even" comparison. what doesnt change is how much a dollar is when being spent on a car. dollars is what i use to compare things because its what society uses. at the prices they cost, i think its a valid comparison. if you think that you should spend 600 more on the frs to make it fair i think youve done exactly the opposite. either way its not about fair, its about comparing and thats how they compare them.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 09:06 PM   #188
JS + BRZ
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: 2010 MS3
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,820
Thanks: 1,180
Thanked 1,161 Times in 597 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yeah, I agree with fatoni on this. The comparison was to show the consumers how these two cars do in stock form.

BRZ losing out to Si in that video on the track shouldn't really make anyone mad or frustrated.
JS + BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 09:22 PM   #189
suaveflooder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,295
Thanks: 2,708
Thanked 1,052 Times in 664 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I have both cars. I LOVE my civic. If it came down to selling one, the FRS would go. Civic is tried and true (I know I will get 200k+ miles out of her), more space (I can fit people in the back ) and more usable (HUGE TRUNK!!! 36 mpg consistently…I get about 27 in the FRS)
suaveflooder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 09:33 PM   #190
JS + BRZ
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: 2010 MS3
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,820
Thanks: 1,180
Thanked 1,161 Times in 597 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Reliability? Cargo volume? Gas mileage?

Thought I registered for a RWD sports car forum.
JS + BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to JS + BRZ For This Useful Post:
Demandred7 (01-11-2014), Sellout (01-10-2014), SoCal909 (01-18-2014), xia (01-11-2014)
Old 01-11-2014, 09:33 AM   #191
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,798
Thanks: 2,187
Thanked 4,243 Times in 2,221 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JS + MS3 View Post
Yeah, I agree with fatoni on this. The comparison was to show the consumers how these two cars do in stock form.

BRZ losing out to HPF Si in that video on the track shouldn't really make anyone mad or frustrated.
Don't care that much either way, but you really should add HPF to that statement to make it accurate.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DarkSunrise For This Useful Post:
OrbitalEllipses (01-11-2014)
Old 01-11-2014, 09:41 AM   #192
pseudo
Senior Member
 
pseudo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2008 Cayman S
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 116
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I love all the civic bashing. It's a wonder what a handful of teenagers with fart can exhausts can do to a car's perception.

The fact is that the 9th gen si has a much better engine - more usable torque and MUCH more NA room to grow - full bolt ons will net you 250whp easily, and an aggressive NA build will push 300whp. Oh, and thats WITHOUT direct injection.

The SI can corner so much harder than the stock brz. I have yet to put stickier rubber on my BRZ as it's on snow tires right now, but the LSD on the SI lets you push corners hard, and the under-steer is no worse than the FRS' oversteer.

Take a BRZ and an SI civic and put an equal amount of money into each and the SI will crush the BRZ all day long.

That being said, I traded in my 2013 si coupe with 10k miles on it for a car that I could put sideways.
pseudo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 09:55 AM   #193
industrial
Add lightness!
 
industrial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 17' WRX
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,253
Thanks: 380
Thanked 888 Times in 411 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudo View Post
I love all the civic bashing. It's a wonder what a handful of teenagers with fart can exhausts can do to a car's perception.

The fact is that the 9th gen si has a much better engine - more usable torque and MUCH more NA room to grow - full bolt ons will net you 250whp easily, and an aggressive NA build will push 300whp. Oh, and thats WITHOUT direct injection.

The SI can corner so much harder than the stock brz. I have yet to put stickier rubber on my BRZ as it's on snow tires right now, but the LSD on the SI lets you push corners hard, and the under-steer is no worse than the FRS' oversteer.

Take a BRZ and an SI civic and put an equal amount of money into each and the SI will crush the BRZ all day long.

That being said, I traded in my 2013 si coupe with 10k miles on it for a car that I could put sideways.
Are we seriously having this discussion? There are LOTS of cars that make/will make more power than the brz. There are lots of us that came from more expensive cars that had 2-3x as much power as the brz. It's just funner to drive. No need to say anything else.
industrial is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to industrial For This Useful Post:
Demandred7 (01-11-2014), horrorbiz (01-14-2014), xia (01-11-2014)
Old 01-11-2014, 10:32 AM   #194
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,798
Thanks: 2,187
Thanked 4,243 Times in 2,221 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
This is what happens when you actually match up a stock (non-HFP) Civic SI vs. stock BRZ at the track:

C&D Lightning Lap:
BRZ - 3:18
Civic SI - 3:24

http://www.caranddriver.com/features...o-2013-page-10
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DarkSunrise For This Useful Post:
horrorbiz (01-14-2014)
Old 01-11-2014, 10:55 AM   #195
Apoc
Senior Member
 
Apoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Raven FR-S 6M
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 638
Thanks: 348
Thanked 375 Times in 232 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudo View Post
I love all the civic bashing. It's a wonder what a handful of teenagers with fart can exhausts can do to a car's perception.

The fact is that the 9th gen si has a much better engine - more usable torque and MUCH more NA room to grow - full bolt ons will net you 250whp easily, and an aggressive NA build will push 300whp. Oh, and thats WITHOUT direct injection.

The SI can corner so much harder than the stock brz. I have yet to put stickier rubber on my BRZ as it's on snow tires right now, but the LSD on the SI lets you push corners hard, and the under-steer is no worse than the FRS' oversteer.

Take a BRZ and an SI civic and put an equal amount of money into each and the SI will crush the BRZ all day long.

That being said, I traded in my 2013 si coupe with 10k miles on it for a car that I could put sideways.
The SI engine is 2.4 liters and shouldn't be providing equivalent hp to the FA20 it should be making 30-40 more hp stock. Also the big difference between oversteer and understeer is that understeer is much less desirable and can't be counter steered to keep you on your track. Oversteer will crush understeer all day long.
__________________
“The World is Flat”
[||•]=(86)=[•||]
Apoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 12:08 PM   #196
mwjcyber
Senior Member
 
mwjcyber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 13' Subaru BRZ Limited SWP 6MT
Location: Albuquerque, NM (5923 ft)
Posts: 465
Thanks: 515
Thanked 307 Times in 170 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Did all of you even watch the video? They liked the BRZ better, in stock form the SI was 0.10 second faster, and they said "if the BRZ had the same tires as the SI it would have been 2 seconds faster."

The SI's 2.4l makes same practically same power as BRZ's 2.0l, it's front wheel drive, suffers from under-steer, is 100lbs heavier, and has massive amounts of body roll.
The BRZ has a better suspension, better steering response, HID headlights, Alcantra leather, push button start, keyless entry, heated seats/mirrors, Anti theft security system, and IMHO looks better and is more "exclusive."
Sorry Honda fanboys...discussion over.

BRZ > Civic SI HFP
mwjcyber is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mwjcyber For This Useful Post:
Apoc (01-11-2014)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FRS/BRZ vs. 2013 Civic SI triwoody FR-S / BRZ vs.... 202 02-22-2022 09:08 AM
2013 Subaru BRZ vs 2012 Honda Civic Si HFP vh_supra26 FR-S / BRZ vs.... 172 08-24-2012 04:51 PM
2013 Subaru BRZ and 2013 Scion FR-S: A Study in Comparison and Contrast Zgrinch Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 124 02-21-2012 03:43 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.