|
|
#71 |
|
Because compromise ®
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,819
Thanks: 4,051
Thanked 9,556 Times in 4,196 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Only if you can attribute the engine blowing up to the pulley and not by it being struck by a meteorite.
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Captain Snooze For This Useful Post: | tennisfreak (01-07-2014) |
|
|
#72 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,558
Thanks: 188
Thanked 462 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to wootwoot For This Useful Post: | tennisfreak (01-08-2014) |
|
|
#73 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,558
Thanks: 188
Thanked 462 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
From Cobb:
Hello! The real question here is whether or not a harmonic balancer/dampener is necessary on a a Subaru engine, and the answer is no. The fact is that some engines are more balanced than other simply by design. The Subaru boxer engine is inherently more balanced than say an inline 4 or V8, both of which typically require some sort of added dampener, typically in the form a heavy rubber insulated crank pulley. It is absolutely fine to run an aftermarket pulley on a boxer engine, we have had them installed on our shop cars and employee cars for 100k+ hard miles without issue. The only downside would potentially be the lightened rotating assembly making it harder to start out from 1st gear, as with any lightweight flywheel. However, you really will not have any noticeable increase in difficulty with just a pulley. From Wikipedia: "The boxer configuration is the only configuration in common use that does not have unbalanced forces with a four-stroke cycle regardless of the number of cylinders, as long as both banks have the same number of cylinders. They do not require a balance shaft or counterweights on the crankshaft to balance the weight of the reciprocating parts, which are required in most other engine configurations" Thank you, Aaron ph: 866-922-3059 |
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wootwoot For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#74 |
|
Just a dude
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Scion FR-S 2013
Location: Edson, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,289
Thanks: 1,185
Thanked 1,188 Times in 852 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
There you go, a lightweight pulley on "our engine" has zero negative effects. Thx all for your independant research.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Because compromise ®
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,819
Thanks: 4,051
Thanked 9,556 Times in 4,196 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
One thing I notice that is totally absent from this discussion is the possibility of creating a black hole that will devour our galaxy after fitting a lightweight pulley. I read about it some where and will post the link if I find it again.
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Captain Snooze For This Useful Post: | jonbonazza (01-08-2014) |
|
|
#76 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,558
Thanks: 188
Thanked 462 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to wootwoot For This Useful Post: | Captain Snooze (01-08-2014) |
|
|
#77 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 GBS BRZ Limited
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 627
Thanked 1,445 Times in 711 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
It is perfectly understood physics that the heavier pulley stores more energy than a light pulley. E = I*w^2 where E is the kinetic energy, I is the rotational inertia of the rotating mass, and w is the angular velocity (RPM). Light pulley, I is small, Heavy Pulley I is big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 GBS BRZ Limited
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 627
Thanked 1,445 Times in 711 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
One question I keep asking is: "Are the rotating masses of our engines dynamically balanced at the factory?".
If the answer is YES then changing any piece of the rotating mass without rebalancing is not smart. If the answer is NO, then go for it! My factory pulley has a hole drilled into it near the perimeter in the front. This leads me to believe that the rotating assembly IS balanced at the factory. I have my racing 4-cylinder boxer engines dynamically balanced by a pro before I assemble the engine. If I change ANY part of the rotating mass after that, I need to have the entire assembly rebalanced. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2008 Cayman S
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 116
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 GBS BRZ Limited
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 627
Thanked 1,445 Times in 711 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You are correct. What some on here fail to understand is that you have more energy stored to use when you shift with the heavier components.
Same thing applies to lightened flywheels. If you lighten your flywheel & pulley (all rotating mass) and try to "peel out" from a stop, you will have a much harder time than if you had the heavier rotating mass. |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Aliso Viejo, CA
Posts: 503
Thanks: 222
Thanked 177 Times in 80 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 Raven FRS
Location: United States
Posts: 41
Thanks: 33
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to effty_ac For This Useful Post: | Captain Snooze (01-08-2014) |
|
|
#83 |
|
Because compromise ®
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,819
Thanks: 4,051
Thanked 9,556 Times in 4,196 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
lol
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Captain Snooze For This Useful Post: | effty_ac (01-08-2014) |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| monorail |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: AgencyPower Lightweight Crank Pulley | Firestorm_86 | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 0 | 11-22-2013 05:13 PM |
| Lightweight crank pulley on an AUTOMATIC | Gani21 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 17 | 09-30-2013 11:27 AM |
| FS: Perrin lightweight crank pulley | tmccoy33 | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 1 | 09-12-2013 05:52 PM |
| My lightweight crank pulley experience | WolfsFang | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 22 | 11-29-2012 03:15 AM |
| Ralco RZ Lightweight Crank Pulley HELP! | JERZgrl88 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 11 | 10-10-2012 01:41 PM |