follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2013, 01:27 PM   #393
Whitigir
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 450 awhp twin turbo vr4
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 94
Thanked 273 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2oinferno View Post
Well, yeah. Nobody was claiming that though. Engines with higher displacement just naturally have more potential based on physics. But the V8 isn't blown stock, and the I4 is.

I'm going to pull some figures out of my ass here, forgive me, because we don't have any pricing figures. So let's just go on assumption.

Figure 25 grand for the I4T version of the Mustang. Figure 30 grand for the V8. I'm not sure where you got 50% less power though. Unofficial figures have been posted, and sit right now (testing is still being done) at 305-315 horsepower and 300-310 lb ft torque on the I4. That's about 25% less than the V8 currently.

Again, talking out of my ass, but figure a tune and bolt ons will put the I4 and V8 on equal footing power wise. Throw E85 at the turbo and it'll go even more. You're still under the base cost of the V8. If you want to dump thousands into it, that engine is already forged, which is why that diagram was so important to my post.

Sure we can compare the turbo V8 Mustang now. How much is a Hellion single turbo kit for the 5.0? Figure about 6-7 grand? So that puts us at 37ish thousand to be making a ton of power. It's definitely the way to go for people that want boatloads of power. I don't care to have a thousand horsepower though. I've owned a fast Mustang, so I've already experienced it.
You have all valid points there, except...expect the I4T to be as, or more expensive than the V6.

I don't know, but "there is no replacement for displacement." I rather go NA V8 instead of the I4T.

Words have it that the I4T can be as heavy, if not heavier than the V6 due to all the Liquid inter cooling, Integrated manifolds, and material. Extra coolings ...etc.

So, for the power output a little more than a V6, but with that level of complication ? I rather take any NA. If you want turbo, you can always Turbo it later with after market part.

Last thing though, the I4T diagram there look to be solid proof, built everything. If it is really what Ford said it to be, it will be very reliable, and Bullet Proof like an Already Built Evo X Internal Mivec....Which I seriously Doubt it...as how much trouble all of Ford Ecoboost Engine vehicles are out there presently

I don't know why, but as far as a consumer point of view, I think Ford has failed again...I would have no problem buying any Toyota...but would think twice...or more about any Ford.

The only Mustang I really like is the V8 mustang....that car is a freaking beast for the money.....
Whitigir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 01:44 PM   #394
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitigir View Post
You have all valid points there, except...expect the I4T to be as, or more expensive than the V6.
Correct. And the current V6 starts at 22. So I started at 25. I think 3 grand is a fair premium over the base V6 to get the I4.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitigir View Post
Words have it that the I4T can be as heavy, if not heavier than the V6 due to all the Liquid inter cooling, Integrated manifolds, and material. Extra coolings ...etc.

So, for the power output a little more than a V6, but with that level of complication ? I rather take any NA. If you want turbo, you can always Turbo it later with after market part.
Not only better output than the V6, but a better power band and torque curve as well. It may be slightly heavier, but then you want to go on and compare it to adding aftermarket forced induction... which just adds that weight right back in.

Best thing though, sure it may be a bit more complicated, but it's also under factory warranty. I wouldn't be surprised if Ford released some staged performance packages as well that retain the warranty. They have for the Focus, so why wouldn't they for their bread and butter sports car?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitigir View Post
Last thing though, the I4T diagram there look to be solid proof, built everything. If it is really what Ford said it to be, it will be very reliable, and Bullet Proof like an Already Built Evo X Internal Mivec....Which I seriously Doubt it...as how much trouble all of Ford Ecoboost Engine vehicles are out there presently
Doubt it as much as you want. That image is attached to the Ford press release from yesterday. I bolded those bits for you and copied it over here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford
HORSEPOWER UNLEASHED – MOTIVATING THE ALL-NEW FORD MUSTANG

5.0-liter V8 anchors the all-new Ford Mustang lineup with power and torque fit for the iconic brand
New 2.3-liter EcoBoost® brings turbocharging to Mustang with exceptional power and torque and projected class-leading fuel efficiency
Manual transmissions provide smoother shifting, automatic transmissions feature steering-wheel-mounted paddle shifters
The all-new Ford Mustang offers a choice of engines available with either manual or automatic transmissions that make it a great all-around performer no matter how you mix and match.


Less is more, EcoBoost comes to Mustang
The new 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine brings turbocharging to the Mustang powertrain lineup. Designed to meet the needs of drivers looking for outstanding performance and projected best-in-class fuel efficiency, this EcoBoost engine has been developed specifically for Mustang. The intake manifold and turbocharger housing are optimized to provide better breathing and higher output in Mustang.

With a projected 305-plus horsepower and 300-plus lb.-ft. of torque, this EcoBoost engine fits the bill for a true Mustang powerplant.

"This EcoBoost engine delivers the healthy output that Mustang drivers expect regardless of the speed," said Scott Makowksi, EcoBoost powertrain engineering manager. "This EcoBoost engine might be small in displacement, but it delivers where a Mustang driver expects it with a broad, flat torque curve and great driveability under any conditions."

The newest member of Ford's global family of EcoBoost engines, the 2.3-liter continues to take advantage of state-of-the-art technologies including direct fuel injection, twin independent variable camshaft timing and turbocharging to produce big-engine power and torque with improved fuel efficiency.

This is the first Ford engine to utilize a low-inertia twin-scroll turbocharger that provides quicker boost response while enabling lower emissions and improved efficiency. The cylinder head features an integrated exhaust manifold that separates the inner and outer pairs of cylinders into each inlet passage to the turbo.

Keeping the exhaust pulses separated from the next cylinder in the firing order eliminates mixing losses and maximizes pulse energy to the turbine wheel. The result is quicker torque delivery when the driver needs it for passing maneuvers and similar performance to a twin-turbocharger configuration.

The separated exhaust ports also enable the exhaust valves to stay open longer for reduced pumping losses that improve specific fuel consumption by about 1 percent.

With more than 305 horsepower and 300 lb.-ft. of torque pumped out from such a small engine, in a car where drivers are more inclined to use it, ensuring durability was critical. Enhancements to the Mustang EcoBoost engine to withstand the added stresses include:

Forged-steel crankshaft
Piston-cooling jets
Steel piston ring carriers
Premium bearing materials
Upgraded valve seat materials
Forged-steel connecting rods
High-pressure die-cast aluminum cylinder block with ladder-frame bearing caps
Deep-sump, die-cast aluminum oil pan
The beating heart of a pony

No Ford Mustang engine lineup would be complete without a great V8 engine at its core. The 5.0-liter V8 powers into a new generation with a host of upgrades that enable it to breathe better, especially at higher engine speeds. Many of these changes are derived from the lessons learned in developing the special edition 2013 Mustang Boss 302.

Getting air into the cylinders and exhaust out is the key to generating more power and torque from any engine, and that has been the focus of development on the V8, which features:

Larger intake valves
Larger exhaust valves
Revised intake camshafts
Revised exhaust camshafts
Stiffer valve springs – ensures that the valves close completely at high rpm
New cylinder-head casting – revised ports that provide a straighter path to the valves for less-restrictive intake and exhaust flow; combustion chamber modifications accommodate larger valves
Sinter forged connecting rods – lighter and more durable for high-rpm operation
Redesigned piston tops – deeper cutouts clear the new larger valves
Rebalanced forged crankshaft – supports higher-rpm operation
These upgrades are projected to generate more than 420 horsepower and 390 lb.-ft. of torque.

A new intake manifold includes charge motion control valves to partially close off port flow at lower engine speeds. This increases the air charge tumble and swirl for improved air-fuel mixing. This results in better fuel economy, idle stability and lower emissions.

The variable camshaft timing on the intake side now has a greater range of adjustment available thanks to mid-lock phasers. This enables better optimized control of the valve timing over a broader range of engine speeds and loads for improved fuel economy and emissions

Transmissions
More than most drivers, Mustang owners like to take control and shift for themselves. Whether they select a fully manual gearbox or the updated automatic transmission, the experience will be better than in any previous pony.

The Getrag manual has a new shift linkage design for shorter throws and improved precision. The shift lever is now positioned closer to the driver and away from the cup-holders so the driver has a clear path for shifting.

Mustang blends outstanding all-around performance and everyday usability. Drivers who prefer to let the car handle the shifting during their daily work run, but still want to take control when the roads get twisty, will appreciate the new steering-wheel-mounted shift paddles with rev-matching downshifts that are now standard with the Select-Shift six-speed automatic transmission.

The automatic also features a redesigned case with cast-in ribs that help make it stiffer and reduce the weight. Internally clutches have been optimized and operating temperature has been increased to reduce friction. The output shaft is now supported by a ball-bearing that enables a top speed of 155 mph for Mustang GT.

With a choice of powertrains to match driving styles and lifestyles, the new Mustang has contemporary technology under the hood to match its modern design and remain quintessentially Mustang.
In the end, I agree that if money were unlimited I'd rather have the V8. Unfortunately it's not unlimited, and I just don't want to pay 30 grand for a car right now.
n2oinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 03:53 PM   #395
thill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2020 SS1LE (previous 13 BRZ owner)
Location: North Pole
Posts: 2,753
Thanks: 328
Thanked 1,463 Times in 802 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
While I have not driven the car or seen it in person, I am disappointed. I think Ford really had a chance to evolve the brand and make the car sleeker, more modern looking, and lighter. They did not. In many ways, I actually find the newer version (on the exterior) to be a letdown vs the current gen. In the end, it looks like a big, heavy car. When you sit in the cockpit and look out the windshield, you are going to see a big hood like you do in a Camaro or Challenger.

I am glad the live rear axle is gone and the Ecoboost engine sounds promising, but the rest of the car is very meh for me. Pretty much more of the same, which for Mustang people, will make them happy. But for those of us that thought the Mustang could be something new and special, I think Ford missed the opportunity.
thill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 05:45 PM   #396
HeubergerMotors
 
HeubergerMotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2006 WRX TR
Location: 1080 Motor City Drive , Colorado Springs 80905
Posts: 1,698
Thanks: 766
Thanked 408 Times in 242 Posts
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I actually adore the look!
HeubergerMotors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 03:18 PM   #397
sofrsnsokleen
GEARS!!???
 
sofrsnsokleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: raven black 2013 scion fr-s
Location: the southeast side of san antonio, where the players play!
Posts: 202
Thanks: 30
Thanked 64 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by m.wood0213 View Post
Wow that's bad. Looks like a Taurus and the hood is very tall. Even if it sheds 400lbs it will still handle like crap.
its suspension is completely redesigned and now has irs. even when it didn't it would smoke literally any fr-s at any race. handling is nice but what good is it if theres not enough power to win a race with curves? now with the weight loss, new suspension, its gonna be a beast on the track and drag.
sofrsnsokleen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 03:23 PM   #398
sofrsnsokleen
GEARS!!???
 
sofrsnsokleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: raven black 2013 scion fr-s
Location: the southeast side of san antonio, where the players play!
Posts: 202
Thanks: 30
Thanked 64 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thill View Post
While I have not driven the car or seen it in person, I am disappointed. I think Ford really had a chance to evolve the brand and make the car sleeker, more modern looking, and lighter. They did not. In many ways, I actually find the newer version (on the exterior) to be a letdown vs the current gen. In the end, it looks like a big, heavy car. When you sit in the cockpit and look out the windshield, you are going to see a big hood like you do in a Camaro or Challenger.

I am glad the live rear axle is gone and the Ecoboost engine sounds promising, but the rest of the car is very meh for me. Pretty much more of the same, which for Mustang people, will make them happy. But for those of us that thought the Mustang could be something new and special, I think Ford missed the opportunity.
ford wasn't trying to completely reinvent the mustang, that would kill 50 yrs of heritage. They sought out to design a mustang that still fit in line with the lineage of all the previous models but be progressive towards the future. Of course its going to have a big long hood, and look muscular, it IS a muscle car. Its actually going to be the smallest muscle car on the market as well. If you want something smaller and compact, thats why they sell the focus st.

I hate how many car "enthusiasts" knock muscle cars. Is there no pride in our products any more?

I love the twins but to me the mustang gt has always been the everymans true sports car. Thanks to fast and furious franchise, everyone wants a 1000hp japanese car... wtf happened 'merica?
sofrsnsokleen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 03:37 PM   #399
ZetaVI
Gundam Meister
 
ZetaVI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: A Gundam
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 320
Thanked 1,010 Times in 510 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'm not sure how I feel about this just yet. I think I need to see it in person first but I do know that rear end is just awful.
ZetaVI is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ZetaVI For This Useful Post:
M.I.A (12-07-2013)
Old 12-07-2013, 04:06 PM   #400
Dadhawk
Senior Member
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 20,104
Thanks: 39,660
Thanked 25,434 Times in 11,599 Posts
Mentioned: 187 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Good coverage from AmericanMuscle.com with lots of shots of the convertible.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dbi9hM-RWk"]EXCLUSIVE: 2015 Ford Mustang Reveal with AmericanMuscle.com - YouTube[/ame]
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.

Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S
Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark.
What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk".
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post:
n2oinferno (12-07-2013)
Old 12-07-2013, 08:56 PM   #401
M.I.A
Member
 
M.I.A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: N/a
Location: Jersey
Posts: 91
Thanks: 39
Thanked 41 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZetaVI View Post
I'm not sure how I feel about this just yet. I think I need to see it in person first but I do know that rear end is just awful.
You will like it better than the full color bumper on this model

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
M.I.A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 12:23 PM   #402
chulooz
Registered you sir
 
chulooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: 99 impreza coupe
Location: DC / CT
Posts: 1,666
Thanks: 259
Thanked 380 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2oinferno View Post
In the end, I agree that if money were unlimited I'd rather have the V8. Unfortunately it's not unlimited, and I just don't want to pay 30 grand for a car right now.
So you would rather pay ~$25k (it will not be as low as 25) then spend a few more thousand to void your warranty, all so you could be almost as fast as the proper V8?
chulooz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 11:02 PM   #403
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chulooz View Post
So you would rather pay ~$25k (it will not be as low as 25) then spend a few more thousand to void your warranty, all so you could be almost as fast as the proper V8?
A few thousand? Domestic tuning is generally a decent bit cheaper than import tuning in general. I'm betting a flash and maybe a couple of bolt ons will put you up to 400. If not, throw some E85 at it and you'll probably be good. But like I said, pulling numbers out of my ass. No real idea yet. we'll just have to wait and find out.

What source do you have that says it won't be as cheap as 25k? The V6 starts at 22 now, and I don't see prices going up quite that much.

And and, wait for Ford Racing to start putting out kits to up your power. Keep that factory warranty, if you so desire.

Don't get me wrong, I love the 5.0 V8. I love the sound, I love the power. But for the first time ever I'm not saying "V8 or nothing." I think the 2.3 is going to be stupidly popular with tons of modding potential and aftermarket.
n2oinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 12:11 AM   #404
chulooz
Registered you sir
 
chulooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: 99 impreza coupe
Location: DC / CT
Posts: 1,666
Thanks: 259
Thanked 380 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
No one will argue it wont have potential. I doubt the v6 will stay at 22K. A flash and 'bolt ons' getting your 2.3l 400 is romantic, this isnt an understand german car. e85 is a whole different fuel, taking advantage of it with supporting mods will cost at least a couple grand... and if the v8 burned the same fuel it would be even more powerful. If you are going the Ford Racing route you are mostly certainly spending a few Gs. I just think that a 'stang without the v8 is like an rx* without the rotary.
chulooz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 12:41 AM   #405
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,890 Times in 2,903 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chulooz View Post
No one will argue it wont have potential. I doubt the v6 will stay at 22K. A flash and 'bolt ons' getting your 2.3l 400 is romantic, this isnt an understand german car. e85 is a whole different fuel, taking advantage of it with supporting mods will cost at least a couple grand... and if the v8 burned the same fuel it would be even more powerful. If you are going the Ford Racing route you are mostly certainly spending a few Gs. I just think that a 'stang without the v8 is like an rx* without the rotary.
Everything I've heard points to a nearly $2K increase over outgoing model MSRP across all new model trims.
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 05:19 PM   #406
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chulooz View Post
No one will argue it wont have potential. I doubt the v6 will stay at 22K. A flash and 'bolt ons' getting your 2.3l 400 is romantic, this isnt an understand german car. e85 is a whole different fuel, taking advantage of it with supporting mods will cost at least a couple grand... and if the v8 burned the same fuel it would be even more powerful. If you are going the Ford Racing route you are mostly certainly spending a few Gs. I just think that a 'stang without the v8 is like an rx* without the rotary.
Which is fine.. I can hold onto my pipe dream until the cruel harsh reality beats me down. Looks like the Focus ST FRPP kit gives a boatload of torque and a bit of horsepower, but mainly increases the useable horsepower across the band. For 499, so not terrible.

Mustang without a V8 is what it is. From the beginning an I6 was an option, so fewer cylinders doesn't bother me. I'm interested in the weight difference with the 4 cyl and how the car feels so I'll definitely be checking it out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses View Post
Everything I've heard points to a nearly $2K increase over outgoing model MSRP across all new model trims.
I've heard a lot of rumors but nothing concrete unfortunately, and no real date on the horizon of when we'll get more info. 2 grand, 10%, little to none, etc. Also saw one on a Mustang forum yesterday that the Ecoboost option will be a 500 dollar upgrade over the V6. And I know that when the car hits the hype will be massive and it'll be hard to find for less than MSRP for a bit most likely, but it got me curious to see the price of a current V6 base. TrueCar says there are dealerships in my area pricing them at 18.5 grand. Even for the current base car that seems like a pretty damn good deal.

edit: Ok, so a lot of the rumors stem from a product survey that came out not too long ago, posted here: http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=899
n2oinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
2015, couldhavehadav8, ecoboost, ford, mustang


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mustang at it again! (Shelby GT350) FX86 Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 18 10-26-2016 09:46 PM
2013 Mustang GT or wait for 2015 Mustang GT or new model 370Z (390Z)...??? JayNutter Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 48 01-13-2013 11:03 PM
1966 Ford Mustang T-5R Wes B. Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 33 12-11-2012 10:38 PM
2011 Shelby Mustang Enhancement Detail OTD Cosmetic Maintenance (Wash, Wax, Detailing, Body Repairs) 5 05-24-2012 07:24 PM
Your thoughts of the Ford Mustang Abflug Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 31 08-25-2011 11:15 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.