|
||||||
| Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Boosted
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Not a supra....yet
Location: Riverside,CA/ Abu Dhabi,UAE
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 487
Thanked 1,203 Times in 812 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Grip>Slip
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 13 SWP BRZ Ltd - Innovate Powered!
Location: RVA
Posts: 3,563
Thanks: 656
Thanked 1,717 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Boosted
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Not a supra....yet
Location: Riverside,CA/ Abu Dhabi,UAE
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 487
Thanked 1,203 Times in 812 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SmsAlSuwaidi For This Useful Post: | canu_50 (10-30-2013), Drift-Office (10-30-2013) |
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Scion fr-s
Location: Terrebonne
Posts: 239
Thanks: 115
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Really.. Never had any issue running my PnP R32 skyline with Racepak IQ3 before. I guess it depends the platform maybe.. a lot of friend are running vipec on their driftcar. I might want to check this out!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Drift-Office For This Useful Post: | canu_50 (10-30-2013) |
|
|
#20 |
|
Grip>Slip
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 13 SWP BRZ Ltd - Innovate Powered!
Location: RVA
Posts: 3,563
Thanks: 656
Thanked 1,717 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Scion fr-s
Location: Terrebonne
Posts: 239
Thanks: 115
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Grip>Slip
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 13 SWP BRZ Ltd - Innovate Powered!
Location: RVA
Posts: 3,563
Thanks: 656
Thanked 1,717 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: car
Location: cold
Posts: 599
Thanks: 72
Thanked 610 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Unless I'm missing something, none of AEM's products can drive direct injection systems as has already been mentioned. That's a lot of money to spend and not have control over the primary form of fuel injection.
One thing that is not widely understood: every solenoid-type direct injector needs to have special current control algorithms according to the characteristic of the injector, engine speed, and fuel pressure. This doesn't affect full load as much as it does around town and regular driving. Otherwise the injector can have a poor spray pattern, unpredictable/nonlinear flow rates, and leakage after injection due to bouncing of the armature. If any of you are familiar with peak-and-hold low impedence port injectors, the basic principle of operation is the same although DI uses around 60V, way higher pressures, and much more complicated injection timing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
This all sounds like a foreign language to me, but I seriously hope my tuner speaks in this tongue.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: White 2013 BRZ
Location: Tempe AZ
Posts: 85
Thanks: 24
Thanked 30 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
What @arghx7 is talking about is how the injectors are controlled. Different injectors require different circuitry and software to make them open and close properly and at the right time (which is critical given that each cylinder has ~60 combustion events per second at redline). Each injector (port injection or direct injection) is basically an electronically controlled valve...well a really specialized electronic valve...that controls the flow of fuel into the intake port or combustion chamber. they are controlled through, no surprise, electrical signals delivered by the ECU. There are multiple ways to control injectors, switching/pulsing grounds, current control, voltage control, etc. but for the sake of simplicity lets use Current control. You apply a certain voltage (usually 12V but up to 60V in the case of some direct injection injectors) usually via a connection to the battery to one pin of the injector. The other pin is controlled by the ECU. When you switch the ECU pin to ground you complete the circuit and allow for current flow. This current has to be controlled very closely to insure that you properly control the 'dynamics' or active behavior of the injector as it opens and closes to ensure it delivers the fuel charge you want in the way you want at the time you want. When you allow that current into the injector through switching the ECU pin, you run electrical power (VoltsxAmps) through a coil of wire that is rigidly attached to the outside of the injector body. That power creates a magnetic field. That magnetic field attracts the injector plunger or pintle that has a small magnetic section attached to the top pulling it upward. Pulling the plunger upward opens a channel allowing fuel to flow through the injector and mix with the air charge. The challenge is that each brand of injector is designed differently (it's not random it's for good reasons for that vendor and design need) and requires different electrical behavior by the ecu ('algorithms'). To implement this at the OEM level is 'easy' because you are driving the design from the component level to the code level and because you have a large staff of engineers and vendors to help design the parts and supporting code. Some of this is publically released, some is proprietary. For our application as end-users/improvers it's a little different. If you do not have the info from the manufacturer of the parts then you are forced to reverse engineer it on your own...difficult at the most basic level, incredibly so if you need to also design new hardware to drive new injectors for a small market. This makes it so that on the GT86 software tuning of the ECU is possibly a better solution than going to an aftermarket standalone...at least for now, or I could be completely wrong on that. Direct injection is the future, but it has OEM level challenges to solve in my humble opinion. Does your tuner need to know how to design that hardware? It depends on your tuning solution, if you are a standalone guinea pig I would demand far more verified trust in my tuner than just another software only tune. TL;DR - It's basically a solenoid like you use on your lawn sprinklers, but way way more complicated. ![]() TL;DR2 - would you expect the guy coding the next twitter to know how to build the individual circuits on Intel's new chip? Expertise is relative and important.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| first standalone ECU? | ElectronSpeed | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 14 | 03-16-2013 02:03 PM |
| DI pressure sensor calibration? - standalone | ElectronSpeed | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 0 | 02-28-2013 12:38 AM |