FA20CLUB Innovate Supercharger Tuning, Parts, Improvements & Results

[akuhei]

The blower used in this kit is only rated to 300hp. To go beyond that..you would need a larger blower...and probably a new hood.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

[OICU812]

Stab in dark question here. But with all latest improvements, including obviously the IC what is a realistic expectation with good tune on 91 gas? 91 is most common here and e85 non existent.

Only looking for best guesses or thoughts on a range whp and torque.

[sw20kosh]

Originally Posted by OICU812

Stab in dark question here. But with all latest improvements, including obviously the IC what is a realistic expectation with good tune on 91 gas? 91 is most common here and e85 non existent.

Only looking for best guesses or thoughts on a range whp and torque.

240-250 on 75mm pulley

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49374

Who knows what the 70mm can do. We shall see

[lbroskee]

Originally Posted by sw20kosh

240-250 on 75mm pulley

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49374

Who knows what the 70mm can do. We shall see

FA20CLUB mentioned a 66 mm pulley too at one point. imagine wit that one could do

[sw20kosh]

Originally Posted by lbroskee

FA20CLUB mentioned a 66 mm pulley too at one point. imagine wit that one could do

Blow a whole lot of searing hot air into the motor. lol I'm having that issue already with the 70mm.

[lbroskee]

Originally Posted by sw20kosh

Blow a whole lot of searing hot air into the motor. lol I'm having that issue already with the 70mm.

Where do u live?

[calispec]

From what I have heard they can't keep the belt from slipping with the 66. I actually made MORE and consistent power with the 75 than the 70 non intercooler. I have also heard that the charge cooler cut intake temps in half. Hopefully it is efficient enough to not heat soak with a 20 min track time.

[sw20kosh]

Originally Posted by calispec

From what I have heard they can't keep the belt from slipping with the 66. I actually made MORE and consistent power with the 75 than the 70 non intercooler. I have also heard that the charge cooler cut intake temps in half. Hopefully it is efficient enough to not heat soak with a 20 min track time.

Yep same here. The 75 was much more consistent and smooth on the dyno.

[Lawnik]

Originally Posted by Andy@FA20Club

we would never hold out // just can't put it all out at once...

So, still pulling all the testing info together, would sure like to see actual info to go with the products. Is there going to be anymore testing info posted to this thread?

[bc88]

Originally Posted by Andy@FA20Club

Ill add some eye candy for you all...

Any way this particular part can be bought on it's own?

[utekineir]

08-27-2013, 08:33 PM

.

[mtimney]

I've read about some 'leakage' issues with Innovate's intercooler. Anything on this system?

Does anyone have this system setup yet?
Will we see some numbers soon so we can compare with Innovate's?

[FA20Club.com]

You're not going to see any via differences beside the fact our kit has increased fluid capacity. The intercooler core is the same we just use our own lines & reservoir.

[mtimney]

Originally Posted by FA20Club.com

You're not going to see any via differences beside the fact our kit has increased fluid capacity. The intercooler core is the same we just use our own lines & reservoir.

Thanks! I thought there were other differences, but having an increased fluid capacity would seem like it might do a better job of cooling....which would translate into more power????