follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2013, 09:14 PM   #85
StormTrooper
Senior Member
 
StormTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Pavement MT GR86
Location: The Berg Oregon
Posts: 959
Thanks: 146
Thanked 207 Times in 150 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Since I lit off this discussion I'd like to throw out a few things for those uninformed.

Was acid rain common place from the invention of the automobile until 1975 ( U.S market makes converters mandatory * didn't get rid of NOx) or was it 1992 when Europe placed widespread regulations requiring cats?


I work at a facility which owes it's existence to removing NOx from a process. They used to just dump it into the air and guess what no acid rain.


Does it stink? Yes can it cause rasp? Yes . is it a temporary air pollutant? Yes. Is it technically illegal to tamper with emissions control devices in the U.S? Yes. Do older cars without controls still cause less harm than manufacturing new ones? Yes.

So in short does removing the cat from a small car cause acid rain and make the world end? No .
__________________
GR86 MT premium
StormTrooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 11:43 PM   #86
Simply_the_best
Tom's Racing ADDICT
 
Simply_the_best's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86, 1999 Toyota Corolla
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 490
Thanks: 91
Thanked 94 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormTrooper View Post
Since I lit off this discussion I'd like to throw out a few things for those uninformed.

Was acid rain common place from the invention of the automobile until 1975 ( U.S market makes converters mandatory * didn't get rid of NOx) or was it 1992 when Europe placed widespread regulations requiring cats?


I work at a facility which owes it's existence to removing NOx from a process. They used to just dump it into the air and guess what no acid rain.


Does it stink? Yes can it cause rasp? Yes . is it a temporary air pollutant? Yes. Is it technically illegal to tamper with emissions control devices in the U.S? Yes. Do older cars without controls still cause less harm than manufacturing new ones? Yes.

So in short does removing the cat from a small car cause acid rain and make the world end? No .
Am I still going to remove the cats from my car? YES.
__________________
Check out my car journal!
"Straights are for fast cars. Corners are for fast drivers."

Instagram: @simply_the_best
Simply_the_best is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Simply_the_best For This Useful Post:
Bonks86 (09-13-2013)
Old 09-13-2013, 11:17 AM   #87
StormTrooper
Senior Member
 
StormTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Pavement MT GR86
Location: The Berg Oregon
Posts: 959
Thanks: 146
Thanked 207 Times in 150 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
To put things into perspective, U.S emissions don't allow the sale of the Volkswagen 3cylinder diesel Europe enjoys (70+ mpg) because it emits too many pollutants per gallon but gets nearly %50 better mileage. Same thing for the small diesel ford commuters.
__________________
GR86 MT premium
StormTrooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 12:57 PM   #88
FR-S Matt
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I can tell you, certain counties in Texas do things differently. In Tarrant county, (Fort Worth), you have to do a sniffer test along with your regular inspection. On my older 97 Formula, I had to cap my cut-out for that reason.

Here in Austin (actually Williamson county in Round Rock), we don't have the sniffer test, just a "visual" inspection. That may change later as the population increases further. I had 0 issues getting my 02' SS inspected with everything catless. I would keep the front pipe on the FR-S/BRZ catted for the visual part. The cat on the header isn't visible so I highly doubt people will check that or they will just assume it is there.

I only see things getting more and more strict as time goes by.
FR-S Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 02:08 PM   #89
StormTrooper
Senior Member
 
StormTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Pavement MT GR86
Location: The Berg Oregon
Posts: 959
Thanks: 146
Thanked 207 Times in 150 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I agree and just for the smell and noise I plan on keeping the second cat....just wanted to point out that running without isn't killing baby seal lions. The same way that a Prius does more harm than a Chevy Tahoe.

My suggestion for the OP is to keep one in the front pipe as a sniffer test or just a cop not smelling it and giving you hell is worth it
__________________
GR86 MT premium
StormTrooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 02:26 PM   #90
SkAsphalt
Ridge Racerrrrrrrrr
 
SkAsphalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S, 2004 Toyota Coroll
Location: Regina, Sk
Posts: 3,516
Thanks: 5,786
Thanked 1,363 Times in 954 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormTrooper View Post
I agree and just for the smell and noise I plan on keeping the second cat....just wanted to point out that running without isn't killing baby seal lions. The same way that a Prius does more harm than a Chevy Tahoe.

My suggestion for the OP is to keep one in the front pipe as a sniffer test or just a cop not smelling it and giving you hell is worth it
But a Prius* does not do more harm than a Chevy Tahoe, especially if that Tahoe does not have CATS

*there are MANY variables that contribute to a Prius TOTAL CO2 production, depending where you live, which generation you buy, etc etc etc. it is not too bad
__________________
SkAsphalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 02:55 PM   #91
StormTrooper
Senior Member
 
StormTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Pavement MT GR86
Location: The Berg Oregon
Posts: 959
Thanks: 146
Thanked 207 Times in 150 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkAsphalt View Post
But a Prius* does not do more harm than a Chevy Tahoe, especially if that Tahoe does not have CATS

*there are MANY variables that contribute to a Prius TOTAL CO2 production, depending where you live, which generation you buy, etc etc etc. it is not too bad
It does when you you factor in manufacturing... Look it up.
__________________
GR86 MT premium
StormTrooper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to StormTrooper For This Useful Post:
clayrush (09-13-2013)
Old 09-13-2013, 03:52 PM   #92
tennisfreak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2018 BMW M240i
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 692
Thanked 917 Times in 538 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I intend on keeping catalytic converters on my car. I try to care about the environment and don't refuse to acknowledge the reasons catalytic converters are required/necessary or try to create false logic on why its ok to remove them.

Here are a few reasons, facts, and stats about catalytic converters:

"Catalytic converters decrease hydrocarbon emissions by about 87 percent, carbon monoxide by 85 percent and nitrous oxide by 62 percent during the expected life of a vehicle."

"In 1985, the Environmental Protection Agency estimated that catalytic converters saved at least 10 times more in health costs than the price of a catalytic converter."

"Engineers estimate that during the last 11 years 130 million catalytic converters used in the U.S. have eliminated automotive pollutants that-if unchecked and unabated-could have covered the country with a toxic blanket of carbon monoxide more than 500 feet deep."

"The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data shows that due to emission controls, vehicles now sold in the U.S. emit 96 per cent less carbon monoxide, 98 per cent less hydrocarbons, and 90 per cent less oxides of nitrogen than vehicles sold in the early 1970s."

"Currently, 85 per cent of automotive air pollution in the U.S. comes from the oldest 50 per cent of vehicles on the road."
tennisfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tennisfreak For This Useful Post:
Astroboy (09-14-2013), sierra (09-13-2013), SkAsphalt (09-13-2013)
Old 09-13-2013, 04:16 PM   #93
clayrush
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: FRS,09 370z, 00 CelicaGT-S, 85 300Z
Location: SF Bay/vallejo
Posts: 653
Thanks: 1,258
Thanked 280 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Ill care when they limit the emissions of airliners.
clayrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 04:52 PM   #94
SkAsphalt
Ridge Racerrrrrrrrr
 
SkAsphalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S, 2004 Toyota Coroll
Location: Regina, Sk
Posts: 3,516
Thanks: 5,786
Thanked 1,363 Times in 954 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormTrooper View Post
It does when you you factor in manufacturing... Look it up.
you have no idea how much I dislike people like you. I am aware of how prius are manufactured. I have read the papers, seen the top gear rants, viewed the shipping maps of rare earth metals across oceans and the total CO2 for prius etc. I am aware of those claims.

I said there are variables that can be taken into account that would reduce the total C02 output of a prius - look those up.

Also, considering battery packs are lasting well past 500,000km (See NY taxi's, BC taxis, California Taxis, etc), most of those estimates are off because they were done for 200,000km battery pack replacements cycles.

Just because one person publishes a report doesn't mean you can throw it around at everyone.

Other annoying conversations
"Cows produce more methane than cars, clearly farmers are the leading cause of global warming". NO
__________________
SkAsphalt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SkAsphalt For This Useful Post:
sierra (09-13-2013)
Old 09-13-2013, 04:52 PM   #95
SkAsphalt
Ridge Racerrrrrrrrr
 
SkAsphalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S, 2004 Toyota Coroll
Location: Regina, Sk
Posts: 3,516
Thanks: 5,786
Thanked 1,363 Times in 954 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayrush View Post
Ill care when they limit the emissions of airliners.
They do. Start caring
__________________
SkAsphalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 05:15 PM   #96
topazsparrow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: slow
Location: Canada
Posts: 293
Thanks: 87
Thanked 158 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayrush View Post
Ill care when they limit the emissions of airliners.

Freight ships are magnitudes worse
topazsparrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 06:34 PM   #97
Kelbyat07
Poor College Kid
 
Kelbyat07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: ~.~
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,801
Thanks: 246
Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,249 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisfreak View Post
I intend on keeping catalytic converters on my car. I try to care about the environment and don't refuse to acknowledge the reasons catalytic converters are required/necessary or try to create false logic on why its ok to remove them.

Here are a few reasons, facts, and stats about catalytic converters:

"Catalytic converters decrease hydrocarbon emissions by about 87 percent, carbon monoxide by 85 percent and nitrous oxide by 62 percent during the expected life of a vehicle."

"In 1985, the Environmental Protection Agency estimated that catalytic converters saved at least 10 times more in health costs than the price of a catalytic converter."

"Engineers estimate that during the last 11 years 130 million catalytic converters used in the U.S. have eliminated automotive pollutants that-if unchecked and unabated-could have covered the country with a toxic blanket of carbon monoxide more than 500 feet deep."

"The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data shows that due to emission controls, vehicles now sold in the U.S. emit 96 per cent less carbon monoxide, 98 per cent less hydrocarbons, and 90 per cent less oxides of nitrogen than vehicles sold in the early 1970s."

"Currently, 85 per cent of automotive air pollution in the U.S. comes from the oldest 50 per cent of vehicles on the road."
I know that the catalytic converters are good for the environment but what about the effects on the engine?
__________________

Kelbyat07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 07:47 PM   #98
StormTrooper
Senior Member
 
StormTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Pavement MT GR86
Location: The Berg Oregon
Posts: 959
Thanks: 146
Thanked 207 Times in 150 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
That makes no sense what so ever....if 11 years of cats stopped 500 feet of CO what happened during the first 90 plus years of automobiles?
__________________
GR86 MT premium

Last edited by StormTrooper; 09-13-2013 at 08:18 PM.
StormTrooper is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA20 + Boring holes = bad idea? gt8613 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 19 08-20-2013 02:36 PM
j2 catless pipe sosick Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 28 07-31-2013 11:32 PM
Catless Vs HFC? Koolkiid Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 14 05-28-2013 09:03 AM
Going to track with stock setup good or bad idea? evasquez7 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 11 08-21-2012 03:33 PM
Considering selling my BMW 335i to get FR-S... Good or Bad idea? iBurnTires Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 112 08-02-2012 09:46 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.