follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-27-2013, 06:21 PM   #127
Mr.Jay
Senior Member
 
Mr.Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: FRS :D
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 545
Thanked 699 Times in 438 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
What is the rating on the stage 1? As I remember asking ft86factory and they had it much lower than the 300tq you are at.
__________________
Out of the FRS game
Mr.Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 06:35 PM   #128
gdrider77
Senior Member
 
gdrider77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 623
Thanks: 243
Thanked 263 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitefrs View Post
Any rattles while idle and AC on?


Sent from the moon
No rattles, at least not that i can hear. I will try to pay attention later when i drive home.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Jay View Post
What is the rating on the stage 1? As I remember asking ft86factory and they had it much lower than the 300tq you are at.
Yeah, that is what i was worried about, but ptuning assured me it was fine. Sure hope so. Even on the link i provided, which is their site selling it, they have it listed (TQ Capacity 319 ft/lbs.)

Although on ft86factory they have it for much less? Exedy Stage1

So i looked at Exedy site. here are the specs on their site for this clutch.
Clutch Torque 319
Torque Capacity at Wheels 203
Torque Capacity at Flywheel 254


Now i am really confused, sure hope i dont blow this thing out too fast, as i made sure to specifically pm and chat with ptuning about power output of my car and their recommendation was this clutch.

So who can clear this up? Since there are 3 torque numbers, which one is the one i should be most concerned with?

Thanks all!
__________________
gdrider77 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gdrider77 For This Useful Post:
Mr.Jay (08-27-2013)
Old 08-27-2013, 06:51 PM   #129
Mr.Jay
Senior Member
 
Mr.Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: FRS :D
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 545
Thanked 699 Times in 438 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdrider77 View Post

Yeah, that is what i was worried about, but ptuning assured me it was fine. Sure hope so. Even on the link i provided, which is their site selling it, they have it listed (TQ Capacity 319 ft/lbs.)

Although on ft86factory they have it for much less? Exedy Stage1

So i looked at Exedy site. here are the specs on their site for this clutch.
Clutch Torque 319
Torque Capacity at Wheels 203
Torque Capacity at Flywheel 254


Now i am really confused, sure hope i dont blow this thing out too fast, as i made sure to specifically pm and chat with ptuning about power output of my car and their recommendation was this clutch.

So who can clear this up? Since there are 3 torque numbers, which one is the one i should be most concerned with?

Thanks all!
Actually 4 sets of number as in the pas mag I was reading the listed tq rating for Exedy was listed at 275 with no mention is that was flywheel or not.

Hope the answers come to light before I'm turbo ready and best of luck to you guinea pig.. err friend XD
__________________
Out of the FRS game
Mr.Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr.Jay For This Useful Post:
gdrider77 (08-27-2013)
Old 08-27-2013, 06:56 PM   #130
ecko04
Seems Legit
 
ecko04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Toyota
Location: Here & There
Posts: 855
Thanks: 187
Thanked 438 Times in 250 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
I'm going with the Exedy Stage 1 when the time comes. I used the Exedy Stage 1 in my boosted tC and it held up great.

Ptuning wouldn't recommend it if it weren't good and could handle the power without disrupting drivability.
__________________
No build thread. I don't want to be reminded of how much money I spent.
[insert profound quote here]

Last edited by ecko04; 08-27-2013 at 07:32 PM.
ecko04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 07:00 PM   #131
gdrider77
Senior Member
 
gdrider77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 623
Thanks: 243
Thanked 263 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
At this rate, i have almost broke it in, so i will just run with it for now, and see how it does, as mentioned, guinea pig here, luckily was not too expensive, more the time to install it and the excruciating time to break it in....ugh.
__________________
gdrider77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 07:23 PM   #132
wrxgoose
WUB WUB
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 Firestorm
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 2,788
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,573 Times in 858 Posts
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spitfire481 View Post
I put in a spec stage 2+ over the weekend. Uses stock flywheel. Feels almost identical to stock, slightly harder grab when engaging but not much. I plan to stop tuning around 300-320 whp, so torque won't be too much of an issue for me. Basically just outside the realm of the stock clutch.
i've actually been looking at the Spec stage 3, and will be picking one up shortly. It looked like it was less expensive on the site than the stage 2+, for some reason, but has a higher torque capacity (280lb/ft vs. 264 lb/ft)
__________________
wrxgoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 08:04 PM   #133
spitfire481
Senior Member
 
spitfire481's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2JZ FRS
Location: Pure Automotive Performance
Posts: 1,378
Thanks: 97
Thanked 1,354 Times in 621 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxgoose View Post
i've actually been looking at the Spec stage 3, and will be picking one up shortly. It looked like it was less expensive on the site than the stage 2+, for some reason, but has a higher torque capacity (280lb/ft vs. 264 lb/ft)
It's a 6 puck. More like an on/off pedal compared to a full disk clutch. They just hold more power over full disks
spitfire481 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 08:13 PM   #134
scraejtp
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 68
Thanks: 3
Thanked 30 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spitfire481 View Post
It's a 6 puck. More like an on/off pedal compared to a full disk clutch. They just hold more power over full disks
What is odd is that a Stage 3+ is a full faced clutch, correct? (324 ft-lb)
scraejtp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 08:16 PM   #135
Sportsguy83
I Love custom Turbo kits
 
Sportsguy83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,346 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by scraejtp View Post
What is odd is that a Stage 3+ is a full faced clutch, correct? (324 ft-lb)
Its not only full face/pucks, but also type of material, and pressure plate rating comes into play to say how much it holds.
Sportsguy83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 08:22 PM   #136
Kiske
Senior Member
 
Kiske's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: RX-7 / BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 2,349
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,081 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Guys with heavy clutches. What do you do up hill in very slow traffic? If your killing 1500k rpms just on release is it a bit difficult?
Kiske is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2013, 08:44 PM   #137
nix
Senior Member
 
nix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: AVO BRZ
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,161
Thanks: 997
Thanked 826 Times in 397 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiske View Post
Guys with heavy clutches. What do you do up hill in very slow traffic? If your killing 1500k rpms just on release is it a bit difficult?
No problems here. RPM does drop more now with the lighter flywheel but just feather it back. The car is light enough not to need any handbrake except for things like concrete car parks.
__________________
nix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 01:00 PM   #138
King Tut
NASA SpecE30 Racer
 
King Tut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2006 Honda S2000
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 7,279
Thanks: 607
Thanked 5,759 Times in 3,055 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to King Tut
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdrider77 View Post
So i looked at Exedy site. here are the specs on their site for this clutch.
Clutch Torque 319
Torque Capacity at Wheels 203
Torque Capacity at Flywheel 254


Now i am really confused, sure hope i dont blow this thing out too fast, as i made sure to specifically pm and chat with ptuning about power output of my car and their recommendation was this clutch.

So who can clear this up? Since there are 3 torque numbers, which one is the one i should be most concerned with?
The one I would worry about is the Torque Capacity at Wheels. I am assuming that is ft/lbs which means this clutch will not hold up in most Forced Induction applications.
__________________
King Tut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 01:03 PM   #139
Sportsguy83
I Love custom Turbo kits
 
Sportsguy83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,346 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdrider77 View Post
So i looked at Exedy site. here are the specs on their site for this clutch.
Clutch Torque 319
Torque Capacity at Wheels 203
Torque Capacity at Flywheel 254


Now i am really confused, sure hope i dont blow this thing out too fast, as i made sure to specifically pm and chat with ptuning about power output of my car and their recommendation was this clutch.

So who can clear this up? Since there are 3 torque numbers, which one is the one i should be most concerned with?

Thanks all!
I believe this was discussed earlier in some other thread and I believe the consensus was the torque capacity is 203 ft/lb at the wheels for stage 1.
Sportsguy83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 02:28 PM   #140
jamesm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 1,166
Thanked 2,294 Times in 1,180 Posts
Mentioned: 313 Post(s)
i went through this when i was shopping a clutch for my car. basically, ptuning quotes a much higher torque capacity (and have tested it to a much higher capacity apparently) than what exedy claims.

it's all very confusing, and depending on who you ask you'll get different answers on capacity and whether a flywheel is included. personally, i took the company that made it at their word and went with something rated for a higher capacity (act full face). it's only about $200 more.
jamesm is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clutch engagement issue. Possible clutch cylinders upgrade? wu_dot_com Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 42 04-05-2016 12:11 PM
Special Deals on Clutch Masters Clutch & Flywheel Combo! KronosPerformance Transmission and Driveline 15 08-25-2012 12:22 PM
Clutch Masters Clutch Kits | Island Import Performance IslandImportPerformance Transmission and Driveline 1 07-20-2012 12:06 PM
ATS carbon clutch collaboration model prototype clutch 86 & BRZ kanundrum Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 41 02-27-2012 03:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.