follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2013, 04:49 PM   #239
SVTSHC
(ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
 
SVTSHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2015 Series Blue BRZ
Location: Bronx
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 930
Thanked 625 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ericc B View Post
Great choice. Unfortunately due to the high CO2 emissions that very same Mustang costs $120.000 over here so it's not an option.
I'm sorry.... what?!
__________________

"Sweet Subaru, sweet Subaru, send your BRZ unto me, for the roads of the unworthy must be baptized in speed and glory." ~Zaku
SVTSHC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:25 PM   #240
6-Shift
Seņor Member
 
6-Shift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Raven, Drifty things
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,168
Thanks: 980
Thanked 461 Times in 323 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
soooo...why hang out here when there are Mustang forums? Just curious.
__________________
T O U G E - C U L T U R E
Follow me on instagram! :@tougeculture_chris
'13 FR-S, SBD Turbo kit, Tein Flex Z coils, other stuff. Drifting and autocross.
6-Shift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:42 PM   #241
Ericc B
Member
 
Ericc B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: Audi A5 Coupe
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 46
Thanks: 95
Thanked 35 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTSHC View Post
I'm sorry.... what?!
Welcome to Europe. Dutch government imposes CO2 output based tax on every new car sale. Anything 300 gram or higher gets around $70.000 in tax alone, on top of the original US price of the car. And mind you that's after already paying 10% import tax and 21% sales tax.

And now this may sound funny but a BRZ or GT86 is much more affordable here, because it outputs half of the CO2 of a V8 Stang. We pay "only" $56.000 for one of those.
Ericc B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 07:02 PM   #242
Dadhawk
Senior Member
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 20,109
Thanks: 39,681
Thanked 25,451 Times in 11,604 Posts
Mentioned: 187 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rampage View Post
They just announced the new Camaro Z28 at NY. Supposedly 300LB lighter than other Camaros and 500HP. The size and weight have been the main things that turned me off of the Camaro and made the Mustang more attractive.
Yea, but its 300LB lighter the "stupid" way. They took out the carpet, the A/C, and the stereo has 1 speaker, and the glass is thinner (OK with that one).

Don't get me wrong, I love me some Z28 but not this way. There had to be a better way to reduce the weight then to turn it into an anti-daily driver.
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.

Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S
Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark.
What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk".
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post:
M-17 (04-05-2013)
Old 08-17-2013, 11:47 PM   #243
Allch Chcar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Post Rumor: Next Ford Mustang to drop 400 pounds!

http://www.edmunds.com/car-news/2015...on-a-diet.html
Quote:
Just the Facts:
The redesigned 2015 Ford Mustang will be slightly smaller and several hundred pounds lighter when the car goes on sale next year, Edmunds has learned.
The Mustang will shed around 400 pounds in a quest to improve fuel economy, said a source familiar with the Mustang program.
The dimensions of the 2015 Mustang will be reduced and the car will use lighter-weight materials as well.

DEARBORN, Michigan — The redesigned 2015 Ford Mustang will be slightly smaller and several hundred pounds lighter when the car goes on sale next year, Edmunds has learned.

"I know they are trying to remove a minimum of 400 pounds," said a source familiar with the Mustang program who asked not to be identified. "The big thing is that it will be a 'smarter' size."

The 2014 Ford Mustang V6 coupe has a curb weight of 3,523 pounds when equipped with the six-speed automatic transmission and 3,501 pounds when equipped with the six-speed manual transmission, according to Ford. The 2014 Ford Mustang V6 convertible has a curb weight of 3,652 pounds when equipped with the six-speed automatic transmission and 3,630 pounds when equipped with the six-speed manual transmission.

The 2014 Ford Mustang coupe with a 3.7-liter V6 engine and six-speed automatic transmission returns 19 mpg in city driving and 31 mpg on the highway, according to the EPA.

Ford did not respond immediately to a query from Edmunds asking about the Mustang weight-loss program.

Automakers are required to boost the fuel economy of their fleet 4 percent annually through 2025.

"That car will be around for 8 to 10 years so it has to meet anticipated regulatory requirements for that long period of time," the source said.

One of the keys to boosting fuel economy is trimming vehicle weight, by reducing the dimensions of the new Mustang and using lighter-weight materials.

"There is going to be less overhang" in the front, rear and on the sides of the Mustang, the source said.

"The overall length will be something like 8 percent (approximately 15 inches) shorter," the source said.

The 2014 Mustang is 188.5 inches in length and rides on a 107.1-inch wheelbase.

"The width will be a little less than 10 percent (about 6.5 inches) narrower," the source said.

The 2014 model is 73.9 inches wide.

As for materials "they are going to use more aluminum, better structural engineering in terms of spot welds and so on and so forth, basically using less material and making it stronger," the source said.

However, there is "nothing terribly exotic" in terms of materials.

"It is still going to be a pony car. It is still going to submit a (reasonable) price point so it cannot be an exotic," the source said.

While pricing for lower-end Mustangs is expected to be comparable to today's models, the source said high-end models could see a dramatic increase. The base 2014 Ford Mustang starts at $22,995.

"My understanding is that the maximum price is going to go up about 10 percent and that will be depending on equipment," the source said.

The 2015 Mustang coupe is expected to be unveiled at the 2014 Detroit Auto Show in January or the 2014 New York Auto Show in April. The convertible will debut later at a separate show. It will not be unveiled with the fastback, the source said.

Edmunds says: The 2015 Ford Mustang may shrink in size, largely due to regulatory pressure.
Probably just another rumor but I thought I'd share it. They didn't name their source. The dimension they estimate are 173 inches long by 67.4 inches wide. Which would make it the smallest Mustang in decades. No new pics.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonitti View Post
Daily Driver, occasional weekend drifter.
Allch Chcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 11:48 PM   #244
dem00n
Member of the year - 2016
 
dem00n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: New York
Posts: 3,575
Thanks: 788
Thanked 2,427 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Still to heavy.
__________________
Friends don't let friends Plastidip
dem00n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 11:59 PM   #245
zigzagz94
BRZerhood Lurker #13
 
zigzagz94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 15 DGM BRZ Premium
Location: charon's ferry
Posts: 892
Thanks: 377
Thanked 225 Times in 128 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Smaller, lighter, and IRS. Looks like I might have to keep this on my radar.
__________________
Yesterday is history. Tomorrow is a mystery. Today is a gift and that's why it's called the present.
zigzagz94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 01:31 AM   #246
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dem00n View Post
Still to heavy.
Take into account that 23 years ago the Mustang GT weighed a bit over 3100 lbs, didn't have all of the safety and technology stuff we have now, and this is a much more impressive number.
n2oinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 01:34 AM   #247
bakerr6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 raven black fr-s
Location: cincinnati, oh
Posts: 1,447
Thanks: 503
Thanked 443 Times in 305 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I may be adding another stang to my stable hehe. Think the wife would mind me having 2 new cars? I'll have to start saving if this thing looks and performs well
bakerr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 09:35 AM   #248
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by zigzagz94 View Post
Smaller, lighter, and IRS. Looks like I might have to keep this on my radar.
were not going to get all of those things in one package which is unfortunate. besides, as far as i can tell, the mustang has had the option of irs in the past and it wasnt better than the live axle of its vintage. i feel the suspension is a means to an end and the mustang doesnt really suffer from the solid axle
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 09:39 AM   #249
R3d
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: White FR-S
Location: Montreal-Canada
Posts: 105
Thanks: 17
Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2oinferno View Post
Take into account that 23 years ago the Mustang GT weighed a bit over 3100 lbs, didn't have all of the safety and technology stuff we have now, and this is a much more impressive number.
400lbs will make a pretty significant difference !
R3d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 11:57 AM   #250
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
were not going to get all of those things in one package which is unfortunate. besides, as far as i can tell, the mustang has had the option of irs in the past and it wasnt better than the live axle of its vintage. i feel the suspension is a means to an end and the mustang doesnt really suffer from the solid axle
What do you mean we're not. The mule cars out there are already showing IRS, and inside sources are reporting smaller dimensions and hundreds of lbs of weight shed.



The Terminator's IRS wasn't great, and then when people wanted to drag race, as they are wont to do with a high horsepower pony car, they just dropped in the SRA. Somehow I don't think they're going half assed on this one though. SRA works, but IRS has some real pros for DD application as well.
n2oinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 01:30 PM   #251
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
were not going to get all of those things in one package which is unfortunate. besides, as far as i can tell, the mustang has had the option of irs in the past and it wasnt better than the live axle of its vintage. i feel the suspension is a means to an end and the mustang doesnt really suffer from the solid axle
Keep in mind the Cobra's IRS was a 'make it fit' engineering job using a chassis, subframe(?) and pick up points designed for the stick axle. This will be engineered for IRS from the beginning.

If Ford can impress with the solid axle, they should be awesome with the IRS. Solid axle shows less weakness on a nice smooth track, but IRS will be beneficial to normal roads and rougher tracks. Plus way less unsprung weight.

This thing's going to destroy Camaros.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dimman For This Useful Post:
suaveflooder (08-18-2013)
Old 08-18-2013, 04:09 PM   #252
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2oinferno View Post
What do you mean we're not. The mule cars out there are already showing IRS, and inside sources are reporting smaller dimensions and hundreds of lbs of weight shed.



The Terminator's IRS wasn't great, and then when people wanted to drag race, as they are wont to do with a high horsepower pony car, they just dropped in the SRA. Somehow I don't think they're going half assed on this one though. SRA works, but IRS has some real pros for DD application as well.
i was speaking more towards the ability to drop 400 lbs while adding the weight of irs. ive seen the photos of how much more cramped that coyote is in the engine bay so im keeping my fingers crossed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
Keep in mind the Cobra's IRS was a 'make it fit' engineering job using a chassis, subframe(?) and pick up points designed for the stick axle. This will be engineered for IRS from the beginning.

If Ford can impress with the solid axle, they should be awesome with the IRS. Solid axle shows less weakness on a nice smooth track, but IRS will be beneficial to normal roads and rougher tracks. Plus way less unsprung weight.

This thing's going to destroy Camaros.
thats a good point. i still kinda write off the solid axle on a mustang simlar to the rear engine in the 911. it just kinda works despite what is supposed to happen. i hope this car is a monster. i really appreciate how ford has turned around so fast in america.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
2015, couldhavehadav8, ecoboost, ford, mustang


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mustang at it again! (Shelby GT350) FX86 Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 18 10-26-2016 09:46 PM
2013 Mustang GT or wait for 2015 Mustang GT or new model 370Z (390Z)...??? JayNutter Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 48 01-13-2013 11:03 PM
1966 Ford Mustang T-5R Wes B. Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 33 12-11-2012 10:38 PM
2011 Shelby Mustang Enhancement Detail OTD Cosmetic Maintenance (Wash, Wax, Detailing, Body Repairs) 5 05-24-2012 07:24 PM
Your thoughts of the Ford Mustang Abflug Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 31 08-25-2011 11:15 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.