follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2013, 11:35 PM   #71
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sellout View Post
I didn't think about intake manifold tuning before I posted. It could very well be possible that the intake manifold runners are set up in a way that kills low rpm torque. You'd think that boost would make up for that though. Odd.
Intake manifold design matters much less when you have a blower cramming air into it.
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2013, 11:38 PM   #72
Sellout
Mr. Cranky Pants
 
Sellout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 Argento FR-S
Location: San Diego
Posts: 449
Thanks: 76
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw20kosh View Post
Intake manifold design matters much less when you have a blower cramming air into it.
That brings me right back to, "it isn't possible to have less torque than stock with this kit". So what's the deal?
Sellout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2013, 11:38 PM   #73
swift996
Senior Member
 
swift996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 2,432
Thanks: 712
Thanked 955 Times in 545 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw20kosh View Post
I'll make sure to hook up boost source to the dyno when I go for a dynojet read.

It is making boost down there, my water/meth comes on at 2000 rpm WOT 5th or 6th gear which means it is at least making 4.5 psi.
FWIW if you have data logging capabilities either through EcuTek or simply the Torque pro app, you can log the boost pressure and do a pull out on the open road.
__________________
Innovate Supercharged Black Limited BRZ 6-Speed MT(Build Thread)
2010 Cadillac CTS-V Sedan M6 w/550whp (Build Thread)

swift996 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to swift996 For This Useful Post:
sw20kosh (06-24-2013)
Old 06-24-2013, 11:53 PM   #74
carbonBLUE
Reverse Burnouts
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 Argento FRS
Location: dallas!!!
Posts: 2,894
Thanks: 707
Thanked 1,257 Times in 592 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by swift996 View Post
I remember when Vortechs were dynoing just below 200whp...

Just give it some time. There are a lot of great kits out there and they all draw on different performance, cost, and maintenance dynamics. The Innovate kit was the best option for me at this point in time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
Really? The first blower I got put down 225whp, the second makes 252whp. I don't remember any before that...I could be wrong, feel free to link to a sub 200whp Vortech chart.

I do agree that the innovate kit will get better over time though, we haven't even seen the intercooled kit yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pheoxs View Post
That was on the first blower, the innovate kit has been 'testing' for a year now, I doubt its going to get much more power on this setup. Hopefully the intercooled version will net a decent bumper in power
this was the the tester who lived a mile above sea level so its null for everyone else closer to sea level

you also have to remember this kit is going in for CARB approval on that tune so the more conservative it is the better chance they will get CARB approval, CARB approval costs money and i think they would rather not try twice because they failed the first time because they sold the kit with a more aggressive tune that did not pass the CARB requirement on emmission

they know tuners will get their hands on this kit and show the numbers we want to see they know it will happen so the initial numbers aren't too much to worry about...
__________________

2000 Carbon Blue Toyota Celica GTS 152000 miles
(wont forget you)
2013 Argento Scion FR-S
2011 Infiniti G37x
carbonBLUE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 12:20 AM   #75
pheoxs
Hold my beer n watch this
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '14 Fiesta ST / '91 240sx
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 782
Thanks: 214
Thanked 301 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sellout View Post
That brings me right back to, "it isn't possible to have less torque than stock with this kit". So what's the deal?
It is possible. Say down low you make 100ftlbs n/a. With the super charger you would make 120ftlbs from the extra air. But it takes power to spin the unit, what if that takes enough power to drop the net output to 90ftlbs.

Yes the engine is physically making more power but you have less coming out the crank. All superchargers have some parasitic lag, how much though, no idea. Just saying it is possible
pheoxs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 12:28 AM   #76
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pheoxs View Post
It is possible. Say down low you make 100ftlbs n/a. With the super charger you would make 120ftlbs from the extra air. But it takes power to spin the unit, what if that takes enough power to drop the net output to 90ftlbs.

Yes the engine is physically making more power but you have less coming out the crank. All superchargers have some parasitic lag, how much though, no idea. Just saying it is possible
It is a combo of that (I think this unit consumes something like 30 hp at max rpm and 6ish psi) + this high comp motor and 91 CA octane not liking that kind of boost down low.

Robi (E85, 105 effective octane?)and the auzzies (98RON, 95 "our-octane") have no problemo what so ever.

I need to have my tuner tune the water meth in the low rpms. He only advanced timing for the meth post 3k rpms which is why you see a divergence of the green and red lines start right at 3k. I'll have it spray at 1 psi and have him try to advance the timing. Maybe I'll even swap out the 5 lb/hr nozzle for the 7 lb/hr nozzle... *gasp*

Last edited by sw20kosh; 06-25-2013 at 01:06 AM.
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 12:41 AM   #77
Sellout
Mr. Cranky Pants
 
Sellout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 Argento FR-S
Location: San Diego
Posts: 449
Thanks: 76
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The power consumption of the unit is a known quantity. Roughly 30hp at max rpm(15k) and 1.4bar absolute output pressure(5.8psi boost). It's going to be pitifully low at 2000 rpm and 4-5 psi on this motor.

There's something else going on.

Also, the math just doesn't add up with this:
Quote:
Say down low you make 100ftlbs n/a. With the super charger you would make 120ftlbs from the extra air. But it takes power to spin the unit, what if that takes enough power to drop the net output to 90ftlbs.
Superchargers that are this inefficient just don't exist. They would lose power all over the map, not just at low rpm.
Sellout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 12:50 AM   #78
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sellout View Post

There's something else going on.
Quote:
It is a combo of that (I think this unit consumes something like 30 hp at 7 psi) + this high comp motor and 91 CA octane not liking that kind of boost down low.
What else can you adjust when a motor doesn't like the boost it is being fed?
hint:
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sw20kosh For This Useful Post:
Subzero (06-25-2013)
Old 06-25-2013, 12:56 AM   #79
Sellout
Mr. Cranky Pants
 
Sellout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 Argento FR-S
Location: San Diego
Posts: 449
Thanks: 76
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I can completely understand that. Is that what's actually going on?
Sellout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 01:26 AM   #80
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sellout View Post
I can completely understand that. Is that what's actually going on?
On my motor on CA pump fuel with stock header and cats, correct. As many have stated there is only so much you can do with 12.5:1 CR and terrible CA blend 91 octane during the high cylinder pressures and load of 1-2k rpms. This is my opinion on the matter. Don't take it as bible. This is one of the major reasons I am using water/meth as I really don't trust or like (by any stretch of the imagination) CA 91 octane. The gas really is that bad imo.

I can see that loss gone with 93 octane. Hell it is gone in australia and in Robi's E85 car.

I just need to get the meth injecting sooner and the tune adjusted for it. If not, then flex fuel here I come. =)

That being said, it doesn't impact my spirited driving at all as I am at or above 3k rpms (and not in 5th or 6th) if I want to go anywhere in a hurry. I am above 4k all the time on the track.

Cruising and city driving is part throttle and that feels no different than stock.

Last edited by sw20kosh; 06-25-2013 at 01:47 PM.
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 08:24 AM   #81
mad_sb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,639
Thanks: 632
Thanked 982 Times in 537 Posts
Mentioned: 100 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw20kosh View Post
Yes it is the low boost pulley supplied in the stg1 kit. 6-7 psi.

I don't doubt at all that the vortech sc can produce higher peak #'s. That being said people comparing these numbers to vortech are not realizing that we have 2-3 psi to close the gap. Who knows? Maybe we'll get close.

Going to turn up the boost in the future. We'll see what this meth will let me do.

If you look at the fact that this thing is not running out of breath up top...one can imagine that 2-3 more psi could provide decent gains. Crossing my fingers!

Will try to get to a dynojet to confirm numbers. As it stands with the base 7 psi pulley this should be somewhere in the 235-245 whp area on dynojet.

:happy0180:

I've been laughing at all the low power numbers posts because i learned to tune on a uncorrected dynodynamics.... people with bolt on evo's would come in and baseline 230whp, I would tune them and they would make 280whp and act all butt hurt over not making over 300 like their buddy made on topspeeds dynojet... then they would drive it and could not stop going on about how amazing the car felt... then their buddy would show up the next weekend for me to tune them after they got spanked by a car "only" making 280whp.....

I love the shape of the curve on your plots.. it's all very use-able power. Looks like it has the potential to carry out to 8k (with breathing mods). With the right sized header and the smaller pulley it should be awesome.

I am curious if the way it sounds will get to you after a while... not sure I want to hear the whine when im in DD mode.

I do have a few hardware questions:
  1. Was the fuel pump required for the kit?
  2. Do you know if the smaller pulley requires larger port injectors?
  3. Did the kit include a new map sensor?
__________________
mad_sb is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mad_sb For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (06-27-2013), robispec (06-25-2013), Sportsguy83 (06-25-2013), sw20kosh (06-25-2013), TRD_07 (06-27-2013)
Old 06-25-2013, 09:29 AM   #82
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 615
Thanks: 1,341
Thanked 478 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw20kosh View Post
...That being said, it doesn't impact my spirited driving at all as I am at or above 3k rpms (and not in 5th or 6th) if I want to go anywhere in a hurry.
That's how I feel too. I don't mind downshifting to pass. I hope you can tune that lower end torque right up with your meth injection though, it's a damned shame about that 91 gas out there.

Even so, your preliminary results look good, 3k to redline is a WIDE powerband. I bet you are having a blast with that.
__________________
2013 FRS -> 2011 CTS-V -> 2006 Cayman S -> 2015 GTI -> 2022 BRZ
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 10:17 AM   #83
robispec
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Black frs project
Location: Socal
Posts: 960
Thanks: 189
Thanked 886 Times in 381 Posts
Mentioned: 190 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mad_sb View Post

I love the shape of the curve on your plots.. it's all very use-able power. Looks like it has the potential to carry out to 8k (with breathing mods). With the right sized header and the smaller pulley it should be awesome.

I am curious if the way it sounds will get to you after a while... not sure I want to hear the whine when im in DD mode.



I do have a few hardware questions:
  1. Was the fuel pump required for the kit?
  2. Do you know if the smaller pulley requires larger port injectors?
  3. Did the kit include a new map sensor?
for gasoline no
we will find this out wendsday (70mm pulley)
not needed you tune the car on the maf

iirc the tuner said the stock map sensor is the same as the one found in a STi

Last edited by robispec; 06-26-2013 at 06:47 PM.
robispec is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to robispec For This Useful Post:
SkullWorks (06-25-2013), sw20kosh (06-25-2013)
Old 06-25-2013, 03:54 PM   #84
si
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Canada
Posts: 24
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...t=39910&page=9

Another innovate Dyno but doesn't look as bad down low.... And a bit better up top
si is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Innovate Motorsports Twin Screw Supercharger System, NOW SHIPPING! Innovate Motorsports Forced Induction 577 10-15-2014 01:49 AM
Innovate Supercharger!!! Titanmotorsports Forced Induction 62 08-24-2014 11:25 PM
Visconti Tuning Vortech STG1 & STG1+ Supercharger Kits! Visconti Forced Induction 67 04-03-2013 04:56 PM
Innovate Motorsports Twin Screw Supercharger Kit for FR-S/BRZ Innovate Motorsports Forced Induction 1987 03-13-2013 10:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.