View Single Post
Old 04-05-2015, 10:05 PM   #98
VerusEric
 
VerusEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: BRZ, STI, GT350R, Supra, 987.2
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,146
Thanks: 567
Thanked 2,529 Times in 780 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankenstein View Post
FMEA squad up!

Even when threads are "helped" with a glass bead blast, hardening, or heat treatment... there's always stress concentration due to shape. Many times, you've got residual stresses too.

Fatigue testing will find the weak point and initiate a crack. At this point, the crack is its own stress concentration. The material's toughness dictates how much concentration... and it's just a matter of cycles before the part is #rekt.

Thanks for posting the news publicly. There is no failure in R&D... we follow the cycle:
test --> anomaly --> problem definition --> root cause --> corrective action --> re-test

It's only a failure once you've put it in the field, and it seems like you guys are going the extra mile to ensure customer satisfaction.
Thanks for the words of encouragement. I was personally fairly upset as I'm the main person working on this project. When I put it in context though, it really didn't do that bad and would have lasted a few seasons under severe race conditions. We are dealing with a street car though and we want even more longevity built in.

I should also point out we are testing this at around 4 degrees of negative camber. This is to stress it in the absolute worst case we can.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Pics or it didn't happen!! I want to see those results, please.
Since we need to prove that it broke.

VerusEric is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to VerusEric For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (04-05-2015), Jonsey (04-05-2015), MINOCIN (04-07-2015), Shankenstein (04-06-2015)