![]() |
The Torquiest Header?
Hey guys. Ive been researching headers for years and I suppose I just need some first hand experience. I have the rest sorted, A JDL Dual Resonated FP and a CSG Touring Cat Back is going to go with whatever choice. But Im looking for the highest/flattest torque numbers from a header. Top end Im really not concerned with.
So some choices I have in mind: Ace CS400 JDL UEL P&L FT86 Speedfactory RACE (catless) Open Flash OFH3 (discontinued??) Obviously Ill have them tuned, but I cant find Dyno sheets on all of them to compare. Also the header will determine how I tune. If a tablet isnt enough, Id like a full Delicious kit with flex fuel. |
And here we go.....
|
|
Quote:
Then there is the Tomei thats stupid cheap, but is it good enough for the money? Then theres a JDL EL tuned with a flat torque curve. I just want extra/smarter eyes to give me a little help. |
These are bad numbers from a tuned header, but an example.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...8&d=1406049888 |
|
Has anyone had engine failures related to the valve spring recall???
|
154HP and 135tq from an ACE CS400?
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2640680 http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...1&d=1462174517 |
...better. But testing was done at 54*F, Pretty chilly.
https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=111848 https://www.ft86club.com/forums/atta...1&d=1477018718 |
Quote:
|
No delicious, no header, no flex feul. Put all that money toward a JRSC & dyno. Headers are like + or - 5 whp. 5-6 grand u could be boosted with +50% whp. How much it header and tune and all that going to cost and for what 10 hp?
|
Quote:
Dyno sheets may have slightly different results, but you can't really 'feel' a difference between a few lb-ft on a flat torque curve. They're all "great" headers that will make a night-n-day driving difference (vs. stock) after you tune it. |
|
Quote:
Also, the headers Im looking at are about 30hp and 25ftlbs. Not much to you boost nerds jumping in increments of 100, but enough for a 2800lb car. |
Quote:
I know the OP understands that but it bears pointing out for others that read this. |
Quote:
middle = Ace + tune top = Ace + tune + flex No other powertrain mods. https://i.imgur.com/wa11rJF.jpg Half the gains of a SC, for half the price, with none of the complexity. One is shoving air into an engine and increasing stress. The other is increasing efficiency. The best part, is that the two can, and is often, stacked together for even more gains. |
1 Attachment(s)
On our PTUNING 4-1 Header we regularly see approximately 200WHP. This is a customers car that is bone stock with just our header and an Ecutek dyno tune
|
@CSG Mike
Thanks for your input. Those are big gains, Im assuming from an ACE 350? Call me picky, but the dip is still between 3500-4500. About 8ftlbs. Could it be possible to tune 150+ from 3500-5000 and level the HP from 6000-7000? Peak at 185HP? (93 pump) I dont know the limitations of tuning and how malleable those lines are. Or are these questions for the guy with a laptop? |
Quote:
At any speed above 20mph at WOT you should never really be under 5,000rpm just downshift. Low end is either getting off the line in 1st. Or daily driving and that torque curve would pretty much be best as far as headers go for either scenario. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
N/A is never smooth if fully optimized. I'm sure they'd happily flatten that bump for you, but then you miss on the peak gains (61ft/lbs on e85... at 4700rpm where you'll love it). Note it's again about the same above that bump. So not a dip anywhere, just a couple peaks, likely due to the tuning frequencies of the header. That is the Ace 350 I believe, and its the best midrange gains easy to find any more. There are headers (including from Ace) with better peak power but lower gains down low. C |
Quote:
Also, the gas tunes are on ACN91, so you can expect better results on non-AC91, and even higher results on 93. Power can always be detuned to be flat, and detuning is done quite often when tuning race cars that want a specific power-weight ratio, where powerband is not mandated. |
how are dynos in USA always put crazy values
when we in italy almost every dyno put around 133whp bone stock with 100Ron and you are lucky to get 160 whp with a catless EL header with 100Ron ecutek tuned |
1 Attachment(s)
Decat OEM header with catless 2.5" exhaust, 98ron
Everyone has a dyno plot Don't sweat the peak Oh, and...:sigh: |
honestly choose between Ace & Ptuning. Those are the best options, and don't expect a "flat" torque curve, those only happen with forced induction. If you can take a trip to have one of the other dyno tuned, that is the one you should choose.
|
Quote:
|
I pictured tuning like moving a tent post under a tent. If you moved the peak, the immediate area around it would tapper off each end. But I guess thats a camshaft thing? But from what I hear, tuning is about pushing each peg as far up as possible without the peg getting pushed out. And the total engine determines the length of each peg.
Then Im looking for 150ftlbs from 3-5000rpm on 93. Kinda like this. And Im pretty sure thats all down to which header I put on. http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800...923/xmllqP.jpg |
Quote:
Moving the powerband around like that is usually through a culmination of parts. Some of the main ones being; Intake manifold runner length, camshaft profiles, header design and then finally a tune to maximize it all. Most 4-2-1 headers will give you a relatively flat torque curve on these cars, but don't kid yourself into thinking you can get modern turbo cars like max torque off throttle or V8/Large displacement levels of grunt. I also highly recommend you throw the JDL 4-2-1 EL header on your list. http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...&postcount=169 |
The ones Im leaning toward are the FT86 Catless, and the Ace CS400. Mainly because I dont want full boxer or full Honda noise from the exhaust. My first choice a long time ago was the HKS, until I heard it. But if something like the OFH2 or JDL uel gives me better results, I can go full Subaru.
|
Quote:
The JDL 4-2-1 is an EQUAL LENGTH header. It will not give you the boxer rumble. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The header just came out sometime Q4 last year. Older posts may be referencing the 4-1 not the new 4-2-1. It's $1350 with ceramic coating. $1200 without. $1200+200 for an overpipe =1400 about the same as a CS400. I really don't care if you're set on a CS400 and don't care to compare the JDL but, for reference when other people come looking for answers, at least be factual and compare apples to apples. |
Then I see stuff like this...
And it makes me want to buy a used Tomei and OP for $5-600 and deal with the rumble. https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=130575 https://www.ft86club.com/forums/atta...1&d=1538742495 |
Good idea imo. Otherwise you can debate this for infinity
|
Quote:
This is why having a baseline is so important. Without a baseline, you can't get the % delta, and then, it literally becomes just a number. |
FYI there's a post on FB about a potential PTuning header group buy for just a smidge over 1K if anybody is thinking about that header.
IMHO if you want to stay NA and you want 'torque', I think it's a better buy to get a cheap used 'quality' header from the board here (i.e. P&L, JDL, that pops up), custom tune it, and use the rest for a FD swap. You could probably do all of that for the cost of one ACE header. |
Quote:
https://www.ft86club.com/forums/show....php?p=1888721 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.