|
||||||
| Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: 2015 scion frs
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
OFT tune question
Whats the difference between ots maps V1.59 and V2.067?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Mazdarati
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 608
Thanked 1,369 Times in 675 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
whats the difference between DOS and Windows................
__________________
It's only impossible if you stop to think about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,992 Times in 2,983 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Codename: Stitch
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 91 MR2; 06 IS350; 16 BRZ; 18 CX-5
Location: Hayward/NorCal
Posts: 5,248
Thanks: 4,021
Thanked 5,436 Times in 2,307 Posts
Mentioned: 462 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
I'll be honest, after trying both v1.59 and v2.0x maps on my car, when I am not running E85 I actually prefer the 1.59 map for 91 octane. I'm in California and the v2.0x maps seem to induce too much knock on the local 91 available in the SF Bay Area. In other words I see IAM drop frequently while running the v2.0x map but my car seems much happier on v1.59. This is of course my personal experience in my particular geographical area, and for most others it may be that the 2.0x maps are actually an improvement.
When I am running E85, I do use the v2.0x maps for that.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,992 Times in 2,983 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Knock Correction for 91 Octane USA fuels http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...47#post2216047 |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | PMok (06-19-2015) |
|
|
#6 | |
|
Codename: Stitch
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 91 MR2; 06 IS350; 16 BRZ; 18 CX-5
Location: Hayward/NorCal
Posts: 5,248
Thanks: 4,021
Thanked 5,436 Times in 2,307 Posts
Mentioned: 462 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
![]() Out of curiosity and for my own learning exercise, I may try to pull up the same maps for v1.59, v2.06, and the edits that JB86'd made to compare them.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Codename: Stitch
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 91 MR2; 06 IS350; 16 BRZ; 18 CX-5
Location: Hayward/NorCal
Posts: 5,248
Thanks: 4,021
Thanked 5,436 Times in 2,307 Posts
Mentioned: 462 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
I am running stage 1 with mostly stock setup. I have a catless front pipe, Perrin inlet tube, stock airbox, that's it.
As an update, I did make the SoCal 91 changes into my v2.06 map and am trying it this week. So far so good, I was not sure how well the changes would translate from Stage 2 to Stage 1, but since they are simply small reductions in timing advance I figured there wasn't much harm in trying it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tune noob with OFT question | Tectoniic | Software Tuning | 1 | 05-22-2015 08:26 PM |
| newbie NA Tune Question | eguzman6 | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 2 | 11-12-2014 04:55 PM |
| Tire Size and Ecutek Tune - Stupid question | Pokeguyjai | Software Tuning | 5 | 10-04-2013 12:43 PM |
| Newbie question: what is an ecu tune | Dispect | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 1 | 11-30-2012 02:35 PM |
| A Question for Those of You WITH the Visconti Tune | White64Goat | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 22 | 09-02-2012 06:27 PM |