follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2015, 12:33 AM   #1
dave-
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Australia
Posts: 100
Thanks: 47
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Fitting an additional O2 bung on Stock header?

I've been given an Innovate LC1 which I plan on fitting to the car to enable street tuning. There doesn't seem to be a good long term solution to disabling the secondary O2 with opensource so I'd rather leave that be.

Have the factory header with Invidia over pipe, catted front pipe and Q300 rear section. Obviously the best place to put it would be before the cat in the factory header but haven't seen it without the head shielding so not sure if there is even room for another O2 bung. Has anyone done this? Photos of location would be awesome if they have!

If there is no room, I'd most likely have the bung put in the front pipe before the cat as getting the over pipe squeezed in is hard enough as it is, without having an o2 sensor attached.

I have no plans of changing headers FWIW but I will need the workshop to clean up the flanges between over pipe and front pipe. The fitment isn't perfect and I notice some condensation from the exhaust leaking around that joint. Guessing if its enough to leak condensation, its not ideal.
dave- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2015, 02:52 AM   #2
86drift
 
86drift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 GT
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 517
Thanks: 85
Thanked 263 Times in 147 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I wouldn't bother. If your street tuning an NA the reading from the factory O2 sensor is good enough.

I run an LC1 in place of the second O2 sensor. Easy on catless headers/dump pipe. It's only useful for tuning richer mixtures on a car with FI.
86drift is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 86drift For This Useful Post:
dave- (02-19-2015)
Old 02-19-2015, 03:46 AM   #3
dave-
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Australia
Posts: 100
Thanks: 47
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I was under the impression that the OEM sensor was decent but even on N/A not a good enough substitute, at least for tuning purposes? I'm staying N/A but want to refine my 98 and E85 maps and dyno time is difficult.

I'd originally thought of using the secondary spot with the LC1 but mad_sb seems to have had issues with brzedit disabling it, I'm using ecuflash which I suspect will be the same. Everyone else appears to be using ecutek?
dave- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2015, 06:34 AM   #4
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,993 Times in 2,983 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
The second 02 sensor is a bit more wideband than the primary 02 sensor.
on an oft you can read both the prmary and secondary 02 values.

they tend to be a bit different due either side of stock cat.

if you have tactrix you could also read the second 02 as its just a ram address, unfortunatly i dont know what it is, @Td-d or @ztan may know the ram address for the second 02 sensor on an A01G rom.

You coud then calibrate the stock second 02 reading against the tuners wideband, sure it would be wideband enough for NA tuning.

if you found that ram address then their is no reason you could not do what the oft guys did and repace second o2 with a true wideband and a controller to map values back to levels acceptable to ecu then read the ram address and scale the values appropiatly.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=61724

Last edited by steve99; 02-19-2015 at 06:55 AM.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2015, 08:57 AM   #5
dave-
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Australia
Posts: 100
Thanks: 47
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'd read elsewhere here that the secondary sensor is a narrowband while the primary is a "Denso limiting-current type wideband sensor".

That said, maybe I am wasting my time with a 3rd bung for the LC-1.
dave- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2015, 10:49 PM   #6
86drift
 
86drift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 GT
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 517
Thanks: 85
Thanked 263 Times in 147 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave- View Post
I'd read elsewhere here that the secondary sensor is a narrowband while the primary is a "Denso limiting-current type wideband sensor".

That said, maybe I am wasting my time with a 3rd bung for the LC-1.
That's true. However the primary O2 isn't what people refer to as either wide or narrow band. It'd kind of in the middle. I find it's within 0.5 of my LC1 and it only reads to 12:1 on the stock rom. You can change the O2 scaling to help it read a little richer. You don't want to go richer than 12:1 NA anyway...
86drift is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 86drift For This Useful Post:
dave- (02-19-2015)
Old 02-19-2015, 10:54 PM   #7
86drift
 
86drift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 GT
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 517
Thanks: 85
Thanked 263 Times in 147 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave- View Post
I was under the impression that the OEM sensor was decent but even on N/A not a good enough substitute, at least for tuning purposes? I'm staying N/A but want to refine my 98 and E85 maps and dyno time is difficult.

I'd originally thought of using the secondary spot with the LC1 but mad_sb seems to have had issues with brzedit disabling it, I'm using ecuflash which I suspect will be the same. Everyone else appears to be using ecutek?
The primary O2 sensor is definitely good enough to tune with. I only got my LC1 so I could have a wideband gauge on the dash. I still tune using the standard O2 sensor output.

If you want to use the LC1 in place of the second O2 sensor just feed the 0-1V output into the factory wiring. You just have to turn off the O2 heater CEL in the ROM.
86drift is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 86drift For This Useful Post:
dave- (02-19-2015)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP: O2 bung on Rev Works header stripped? btoast Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 9 12-21-2014 07:11 AM
Who has Open Flash Header (or aftermarket UEL header) in the GTA with stock exhaust? alanhung85 CANADA 6 10-21-2014 11:41 PM
RevWorks UEL Header + Nameless Catted Front Pipe VS Stock Gutted Header + FP NickFRS Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 44 04-19-2014 06:42 PM
Gutted cat stock header vs aftermarket catless header NA application stevo585 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 8 04-04-2014 05:12 PM
fitting 17x9's with 255s, and fitting brake pads Matt Andrews Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 10 06-29-2012 12:08 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.