follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-13-2012, 04:30 AM   #1
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Limited gets brake "upgrade" over Premium - Canada only?

This post could go in the wheels etc. forum but I think it may be of more general interest to BRZ buyers/shoppers. I have yet to see mentioned here an interesting feature of the Canadian Limited version (called the Sport-tech Package) - compare:

Base (Premium):
Brakes (front): Ventilated discs (277 x 43 mm), dual-piston calipers
Brakes (rear): Ventilated discs (286 x 40 mm), single-piston calipers

Sport-tech (Limited):
Brakes (front): Ventilated discs (294 x 40 mm), dual-piston calipers
Brakes (rear): Ventilated discs (290 x 40 mm), single-piston calipers

[Data source: Canadian BRZ specifications data PDF, dated in-text as 20 April 2012; confirmed in telephone call to dealer Saturday.]

Correction: It's been pointed out that these are diameter by thickness specs.

Then there is the question if this change is found in the US Limited or not. I have not seen it mentioned anywhere else but this document (I remember there being a link to it in the Canadian forum but it seems to be gone now).

Edit: just noticed that according to this document all Canadian MT BRZs get a "Hill Holder System" - something not mentioned in the BRZ online manual, and I can't imagine the Canadian version would have it if the US does not - perhaps this is a mistake, will have to check - although I have some vague recollection that there may be some legislative mandate requiring this in new MT cars in the near future.

Last edited by Sport-Tech; 05-14-2012 at 01:46 AM.
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 04:41 AM   #2
CoryUyede
NisSubuGuru?
 
CoryUyede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2011 Subaru WRX
Location: vancouver bc
Posts: 550
Thanks: 6
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scion FR-S View Post
This post could go in the wheels etc. forum but I think it may be of more general interest to BRZ buyers/shoppers. I have yet to see mentioned here an interesting feature of the Canadian Limited version (called the Sport-tech Package) - compare:

Base (Premium):
Brakes (front): Ventilated discs (277 x 43 mm), dual-piston calipers
Brakes (rear): Ventilated discs (286 x 40 mm), single-piston calipers

Sport-tech (Limited):
Brakes (front): Ventilated discs (294 x 40 mm), dual-piston calipers
Brakes (rear): Ventilated discs (290 x 40 mm), single-piston calipers

[Data source: Canadian BRZ specifications data PDF, dated in-text as 20 April 2012; confirmed in telephnone call to dealer Saturday.]

Total swept area does not change much - 23351 mm^2 to 23360 mm^2 - but the brake bias (by this metric at least) moves rearward slightly. My guess is that this has been done to adjust for the increased rear high-speed downforce introduced by the spoiler on the Sport-tech/Limited - the spoiler would mandate a more rearward brake bias to maximize high-speed braking as the rear tires would now have more traction and be less likely to lock up. Anyone with relevant knowledge care to comment?

Then there is the question if this change is found in the US Limited or not. I have not seen it mentioned anywhere else but this document (I remember there being a link to it in the Canadian forum but it seems to be gone now).

By these numbers Doesn't it seem as if the Brake bias Shifts Forward on the Sport-tech? The front rotors have gone form being smaller than the rears(prem) to being larger(sport-tech).

I would love to think they had performance reasons behind doing this but i'm doubtful. I can't understand why they even messed with different rotor sizes to be honest. Is it just to make the Sport-tech That much more appealing?..They didn't really mention anything about it aside from a pdf file
__________________

Past to Present
CoryUyede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 05:26 AM   #3
Enemies
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 SWP Sport-Tech (Limited)
Location: Okanagan Valley, Canada
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 11
Thanked 86 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
More of a downgrade for the Premier really. Both American BRZ Trims have the larger brakes.
Enemies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 08:58 AM   #4
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryUyede View Post
By these numbers Doesn't it seem as if the Brake bias Shifts Forward on the Sport-tech? The front rotors have gone form being smaller than the rears(prem) to being larger(sport-tech).
Yes you are right as these specs are diameter X thickness, not surface area as I thought.

Last edited by Sport-Tech; 05-13-2012 at 11:28 AM.
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 08:59 AM   #5
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enemies View Post
More of a downgrade for the Premier really. Both American BRZ Trims have the larger brakes.
Interesting. So instead of bending Canadians over the price table this time, Subie has chosen instead to bend us over the features downgrade table.
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 11:24 AM   #6
SonnyBRZ
Senior Member
 
SonnyBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 15 WRX 6mt (DD), 13 BRZ Sports Tech
Location: Toronto
Posts: 100
Thanks: 47
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
The guys at Subaru Canada must have converted the thickness incorrectly or made a typo. It is hard to believe the rotors are 40mm (1.5") thick. Not even a 996 Turbo rotors are that thick.

The front should be 294mm in diameter and 24mm in thickness just like a WRX. Since it is a RWD, the rear should be not far off in terms of size as the front so that should be the only thing that deviates from a WRX.

Last edited by SonnyBRZ; 05-13-2012 at 12:18 PM. Reason: Typo
SonnyBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 12:56 PM   #7
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enemies View Post
More of a downgrade for the Premier really. Both American BRZ Trims have the larger brakes.
Do we know that? The Subaru.com website doesn't mention.

I thought they would all be the same but..
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 12:57 PM   #8
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonnyBRZ View Post
The guys at Subaru Canada must have converted the thickness incorrectly or made a typo. It is hard to believe the rotors are 40mm (1.5") thick. Not even a 996 Turbo rotors are that thick.

The front should be 294mm in diameter and 24mm in thickness just like a WRX. Since it is a RWD, the rear should be not far off in terms of size as the front so that should be the only thing that deviates from a WRX.
Good catch
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 01:58 PM   #9
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Those sizes don't make sense. Smaller diameter front discs? Fronts do the most stopping in front-engine cars.
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 02:04 PM   #10
Nate219BRZ
Senior Member
 
Nate219BRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Rip 04 golf gti rip 05 scion TC
Location: NWI
Posts: 230
Thanks: 68
Thanked 65 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Even on motorcycles, front brakes are the workhorse.
Nate219BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 02:33 PM   #11
CoryUyede
NisSubuGuru?
 
CoryUyede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2011 Subaru WRX
Location: vancouver bc
Posts: 550
Thanks: 6
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Anyone else a total skeptic on this?...I honestly won't believe this Till i see a Premium and sport-tech next to each other with measurements taken. Or even Two seperate parts numbers for Front AND rear Rotors.

I believe That with a large enough difference on the Front Rotors especially, Going from 277mm to 294mm, That you likely need Hubs with a different mounting location too. Calipers can be the same, but the mounting location needs to match rotor size. If you keep the Caliper/pad in the same place WITH larger rotors it Literally has no positive effect on braking, it actually just makes it worse because you have more mass to stop but the same amount of leverage.
__________________

Past to Present
CoryUyede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 04:25 PM   #12
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Anyone have access to Subaru parts catalogs to check this out?
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 04:49 PM   #13
djdnz
1337
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ WRB S/C
Location: San Jose, CA / Waterloo, ON
Posts: 1,134
Thanks: 776
Thanked 482 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I have a feeling it was typed up by an intern or someone who's prone to making typos... or doesn't do well with math.
djdnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 07:23 PM   #14
SkullWorks
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SSM LT MT BRZ
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,033
Thanks: 803
Thanked 754 Times in 328 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
On all the early Nissan RWD cars (and GTR's) the rear stock brakes are larger in diameter than the front because of the internal drum parking brake, easy fix you just modulate the knee point in the prop valve and reduce the pad area and piston diameter, the up side is that usually this way no venting is required on the rear rotors, due to large enough surface area on rotor face...
SkullWorks is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Changing Premium to Limited? zygrene BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 32 10-09-2012 11:58 AM
Is it worth to have limited than premium? 8987846 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 54 05-03-2012 10:57 PM
Is it worth to have limited than premium? 8987846 FR-S / BRZ vs.... 0 05-03-2012 12:41 AM
Model Differences - FR-S:BRZ Limited:BRZ Premium merlin2111 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 14 03-22-2012 04:09 PM
Fog Lights - Premium vs Limited Dionysus BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 44 03-17-2012 03:15 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.