follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2012, 09:34 AM   #1
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
PistonHeads production review

http://www.pistonheads.com/roadtests...p?c=47&i=25430

Thorough and interesting - worth a read. Be sure to check out the drool-inspiring video of the BRZ being thrashed rally-style up mountain switchbacks.
Liked this line:

Quote:
The Toyobaru gives you time and space to savour the experience, much in the way you would in a Boxster or Cayman in fact.

Last edited by Sport-Tech; 03-28-2012 at 09:55 AM.
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 07:03 PM   #2
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
The auto is a terrible choice to get in this car it seems.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 08:16 PM   #3
86fanatic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: auto
Location: us
Posts: 243
Thanks: 5
Thanked 43 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
First time I've seen a time quoted for the auto transmission. Half a second slower to 62. Wonder if that's because of rough/slow shifts or long gearing. Every review I've read seems to imply long gearing. Can't wait to test drive both back to back.
86fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 09:04 PM   #4
zoomzoomers
Senior Member
 
zoomzoomers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 Subaru SWP BRZ Limited 6AT
Location: Darkside
Posts: 1,862
Thanks: 526
Thanked 305 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
MPG: 36.2mpg (combined)


could this be true?! If it is then it's way beyond what we've seen tested up to now.

Also, I'm a bit dissapointed about the performance of the AT in this car. I'm going to wait till they do a CONUS review of the AT. Let's hope it's better than this review.
__________________
Man Law#17:A man in the company of a hot, seductively dressed, woman MUST remain sober enough to fight!

MODS: AVO tubes + filter, Cusco (F) strut brace w/ MC brace, Perrin CBE, Subaru OEM trunk tray, Grimmspeed front license re-locator & hood struts and Beatsonic rear cam.
zoomzoomers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 09:22 PM   #5
tranzformer
Delights in pure handling
 
tranzformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomzoomers View Post
MPG: 36.2mpg (combined)
Could that be 36 mpg (imperial gallons) which is equal to 30 mpg (US gallons).
tranzformer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 09:29 PM   #6
zoomzoomers
Senior Member
 
zoomzoomers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 Subaru SWP BRZ Limited 6AT
Location: Darkside
Posts: 1,862
Thanks: 526
Thanked 305 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tranzformer View Post
Could that be 36 mpg (imperial gallons) which is equal to 30 mpg (US gallons).
Probably is. I mean it can't be that much off of what they've been claiming right?
__________________
Man Law#17:A man in the company of a hot, seductively dressed, woman MUST remain sober enough to fight!

MODS: AVO tubes + filter, Cusco (F) strut brace w/ MC brace, Perrin CBE, Subaru OEM trunk tray, Grimmspeed front license re-locator & hood struts and Beatsonic rear cam.
zoomzoomers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 10:08 PM   #7
Jordo!
Enjoy it, destroy it.
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
That sucks. They should have offered a seven speed auto or closer gearing then. There's just no good excuse for that.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 10:31 PM   #8
sirus
86 Owner
 
sirus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: White GTS 86
Location: Perth,Oz
Posts: 279
Thanks: 223
Thanked 39 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Good review! It seems to capture the meaning and purpose of this car

Pitty about the video... 19 seconds of terrible driving
__________________

On the road. Check your mirrors!
sirus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 11:14 PM   #9
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post
That sucks. They should have offered a seven speed auto or closer gearing then. There's just no good excuse for that.


Anytime you pair a N/A 4 cylinder with an auto its a disaster it seems.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 08:50 PM   #10
Jordo!
Enjoy it, destroy it.
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 View Post


Anytime you pair a N/A 4 cylinder with an auto its a disaster it seems.
Yeah, well, again there was no need for that.

What would a seven speed have added in price per unit or weight? It would have been worth it.

There is NO point in offering an AT if it can't keep up (or outdo) the MT -- period. The tech exists and it is cheap. They REALLY dropped the ball here. Hopefully a boosted (or TRD/Sti) version will compensate.

Disappointed...

I think I owe someone (you?) a beer or 5 bucks or something. Crap.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 09:18 PM   #11
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Jordo I think the issue may be that a 7 speed doesn't cost much more, but Toyota doesn't have a 7 speed and they'd need to build a new one. So they just took an off the shelf 6 speed, made it shift a bit faster and rougher, and threw it in without changing the gear ratios. They could've used one of the newer 8 speed units but those are probably more expensive and overkill for a wimpy 200hp motor.

The story sounds about the same for the manual too really, they didn't bother revising gear ratios either.

I guess if it helps bring the cost down, okay
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 09:24 PM   #12
Buggy51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Put Put
Location: CA
Posts: 607
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4630

well, it shifts pretty fast from what I tell. Then again... <_< I think anything can beat my old accord so I'm the wrong person to ask.
Buggy51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2012, 12:54 AM   #13
tripjammer
Senior Member
 
tripjammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Drives: WRB BRZ limited 6MT
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,765
Thanks: 3,109
Thanked 178 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Damn 8.2 secs to 62 MPH? WOW! Ok note to self, go with the 6 speed manual...Car does sound good though...
tripjammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2012, 07:05 PM   #14
Jordo!
Enjoy it, destroy it.
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Hmm. Well, guess I'll wait and see more acceleration times and also whether or not a re-tune of the shift speed helps.

Also, I thought it had a different setting, stock, for sportier (i.e., faster) shifts.

Could be the test driver didn't have that engaged. If not, that could easily account for at least half of the difference, and a re-tune could get rid of the remaining slop.

Also, I'm guessing they didn't do a decent brake-stand launch, which could have shaved another 10th or more easily.

Well... guess we'll see...

Optimism.

Gets me out bed each day
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's here! Top Gear production review Sport-Tech BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 17 03-28-2012 04:03 PM
CAR mag production review Sport-Tech BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 6 03-28-2012 04:00 PM
First Production FT-86 Test Drive/Review on Youtube gaijin0223 FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 4 02-13-2012 10:23 PM
GT86 Driven: Pistonheads frusciantrix Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 43 02-03-2012 08:52 AM
AutoExpress BRZ Review - Follow up to the GT86 Review Zgrinch BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 3 12-13-2011 09:03 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.