|
||||||
| Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S
Location: Houston
Posts: 506
Thanks: 18
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Just replacing the stock cats?
How much of the exhaust gains comes from removing / replacing the cats? From what I read they are the largest restriction for the whole exhaust system seems to be the front and secondary cat. If you just replaced these, would that be more cost effective?
__________________
2013 Firestorm FR-S, MTX, build date 1/13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The cats result in a minimal horsepower loss. A lot of the restriction is in the factory header / overpipe / front pipe on this car. After replacing those 3 components, there have been significant gains both on the dyno and the butt dyno. I would plan on keeping one cat unless you enjoy your car sounding like crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S
Location: Houston
Posts: 506
Thanks: 18
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I would only replace cats with high flow cats, I'd never run catless. Good info though.
__________________
2013 Firestorm FR-S, MTX, build date 1/13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Sonic Blue 86GT Manual
Location: Victoria
Posts: 376
Thanks: 51
Thanked 122 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I replaced the secondary cat with a high flow and have a resonated axle back muffler delete in 2.5" pipe. Definitely mid and top end pulls harder
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S
Location: Houston
Posts: 506
Thanks: 18
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I wanted to revisit this concept as I thought I read somewhere that someone replaced the stock cat with a high flow version and was able generate most of the gains of a aftermarket header (i.e. get rid of the torque dip).
I believe the stock header design isn't bad but the cat is a major restriction. Can someone help me find information on this?
__________________
2013 Firestorm FR-S, MTX, build date 1/13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Replacing stock speakers without juice | fmsida | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 17 | 03-01-2014 05:16 AM |
| Motiv Concepts High Flow Cats and Test Pipes | MotivConcepts | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 205 | 06-12-2013 01:05 AM |
| I giggled... Cats have it made | seven | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 51 | 12-21-2012 04:46 PM |
| Replacing Stock Radio w/BeSpoke | im2fr-s | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 2 | 12-04-2012 03:10 AM |
| Speed cats (or other driving shoes) | Symbiont | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 25 | 06-15-2012 12:10 AM |