|
||||||
| FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING] |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 04 Subaru WRX
Location: Boston
Posts: 248
Thanks: 78
Thanked 141 Times in 80 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
FT-86 v.s. MX-5
I'm surprised no one has compared this car to the MX-5 Miata. The most significant reason is that I expect to see the new FT-86 at autocross events, and whenever I go to autocrosses they are always filled with Miatas. Both cars are lightweight, RWD, 2-liters, that are easy to set up for track. In Japan they even sold the MX-5 with a fixed hard top. I saw one in a dealership showroom in Osaka that came with a rollcage too.
![]() ![]() MX-5 / FT-86 MSRP: $23,190 / about $25,000 Engine: inline 4 - 2.0L / boxer 4 - 2.0L Power: 167bhp / 200hp @ 7000rpm Torque: 140@5,000rpm / 151lb/ft @ 6,600rpm Weight: 2,469lbs / 2,662lbs Wheelbase: 91.7in / 101.2in Height: 49in / 50.5in
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
the hardtop miata was never sold. im pretty sure it was just a concept type deal. they get compared all the time just never in this new official vs category. the problem with comparing how things will do in auto x are that a)i doubt they will fall in the same classed b) if they do, i dont know how the rules will help or hinder the new car and c) we dont know how much tire we can fit under the frs and there isnt an aftermarket for the frs and i dont thinkn when it develops it will be as great as for the miata
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
86 Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I don't care for the miata so in this case FRS all the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Softparker
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: 2002 Mazda Miata
Location: Arizona
Posts: 618
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think Miata has an advantage as far as suspension, steering, and weight go. Mazda always tosses an anemic second-thought engine in though. There are certain quirks of the Miata that shouldn't be present with the FR-S/BRZ, I'm interested to see how that works out. Will the slightly more powerful engine and hardtop be enough to offset the extra pounds and lack of early tune~ability? Will Mazda finally put a decent engine in the ND, or how will Skyactiv affect the platform?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hot Dog
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Since 1989 the Miata has been the definitive affordable sports car. The handling, steering feel, open-air refreshment, low weight and tidy dimensions are virtually impossible to beat for the price point. The FR-S/BRZ has an incredibly high bar to match; if it drives as well as how much its been hyped, it'll have a good chance to be in the same league.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Company Vehicle
Location: Kansas City, Missouri, USA
Posts: 79
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
It seems to me that they will be quite evenly matched. In the stock classes the FRS might even have an advantage owing to the NC's being so softly sprung. From what I've seen the sky is the limit with the MZR engine. But, I'd be surprised if tuners don't embrace the FA20. FRS vs MX5 is by far the most interesting match-up to me so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Mazda RX-8
Location: CA
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The FR-S is the fixed roof Miata I've been waiting for all my life. JK, but really they are certainly similar.
If Mazda had sold a fixed roof Miata I would have bought one. Only thing I can't understand is why the NC gets less than 30 mpgs hwy. Definitely stoked about the FR-S though...Miata like and a 2+2. I just hope it has some Zoom Zoom...Toyota's been lacking in that department for a while. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Site Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
The Miata is hard to beat for a purely fun to drive car. The FR-S is likely faster on any track where the extra power would make a difference, otherwise the Miata is likely the faster car.
It also doesn't have the practicality of the FR-S so, IMO, the two are pretty different cars sold for different needs.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback DD: 2005 Acura TSX Tow: 2022 F-450 Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: 86
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 2,168
Thanks: 287
Thanked 374 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
i owned a Mx5/Miata before and sold it becos i need to carry kids around. FT86 is perfect for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: RX-8
Location: NH
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Shame Mazda never widely sold that MX-5 coupe, as I favor that style. Beyond that, they seem to have always been 'stuck' (some call it pure) as far as changing the car to suit different customer wants. Beside making it bigger and heavier over the years(next gen will return to light), they steadfastly refuse to turbo/SC the engine (except one MS EOL edition), or put any engine of more than mediocre performance in it. Besides that, the car has mushmello soft suspension (easily fixable), very cramped interior w/no real seat adjustment, and few Mazda performance parts unless you join their racing program.
But that's all some people need/want so it's certainly been successful for Mazda, and anyone else whose tried to directly emulate the MX-5 has always failed. That's why I'm happy this new Toyota/Subaru is not a MX-5 clone, but a bonafied modern 2+2 sports coupe with at least some balls straight out of the chute. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
"Mushmellow soft" suspension on the MX-5? Hardly my experience on a test drive. Maybe compared to something like an Exige... but certainly no worse than the RX-8.
I for one don't want the FR-S to crush my kidneys every time I go over an expansion strip or traverse broken pavement... |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Mazda RX-8
Location: CA
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: Honda Fit
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,004
Thanks: 722
Thanked 125 Times in 90 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: E36 5.7 V8
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 1,573
Thanks: 194
Thanked 198 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
__________________
I wish I was cool enough to have an FR-S
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|