follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-09-2011, 11:00 AM   #1
suprachica79
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: free Hyundai, 2006 Kawasaki ZX6R
Location: CT
Posts: 572
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What will the engine need to go FI?

Hey guys. As most recent threads have touched on, this engine is going to be pretty maxed out and it sounds like we won't see many gains from NA mods. So it looks like if we want serious power gains it's either FI or new engine.

Going off of what we think the engine will be, what sort of work will the engine need to go FI? What I mean by this is that because compression will be relatively high, will the engine need a whole lot of build-up before we can drop a turbo on it? If you think the stock internals can handle some boost, up to how much boost/power do you think it can handle? Let's get a discussion going on how much power this engine can handle stock and what it will need if we were to put a turbo or supercharger on it.
suprachica79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 12:44 PM   #2
VenomRush
Thee O-ri-gi-na-tor
 
VenomRush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: So Cal
Posts: 948
Thanks: 59
Thanked 80 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
get a wrx
VenomRush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 01:04 PM   #3
suprachica79
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: free Hyundai, 2006 Kawasaki ZX6R
Location: CT
Posts: 572
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hate subaru but thanks for the constructive addition to the thread
suprachica79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 01:08 PM   #4
Random_Art
professional smartass
 
Random_Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: 16 speed mountain bike...
Location: Georgia
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Without knowing any real details about the engine, it's hard to say.

generally, with a good tune you can bolt on a turbo kit with little problems, assuming you keep the boost low. If you're looking for big gains, however, you're more likely to need some work on the internals. This engine is most likely going to be sporting high compression pistons, so those would be the first things to swap out. Sleeving the block with steel liners would probably be a good idea if the block is aluminum. Aside from that, it depends on the quality of the rest of the parts. For example, you can look at the 2ZZ-GE from the last Celica. It had beefy connecting rods from the factory that could handle upwards of 500hp before you need to worry about them snapping.

I'm sure there's people with more experience putting FI on NA cars than I have that can fill in the gaps in the holes I surely left.
__________________

Goodbye Celica, you served me well.

http://artsofrandomness.blogspot.com/
Random_Art is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 01:41 PM   #5
Marrk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: Honda Fit
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,004
Thanks: 722
Thanked 125 Times in 90 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by suprachica79 View Post
Hate subaru ...

Not knowing anything about Subaru, I'd like to hear more about this. But I recognize that we need an appropriate, separate thread for it. (And I don't want to appear that I am hating for hating's sake. I just want to learn the pro's and con's of Subaru.)
Marrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 02:13 PM   #6
Midship Runabout
formerly Dixie Normous
 
Midship Runabout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: The ladies wild!
Location: ())_)CRAYOLA)_))>
Posts: 996
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Biggest problem will be tuning direct injection
__________________
Midship Runabout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 05:36 PM   #7
WingsofWar
MODERATOR-SAMA
 
WingsofWar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Swagtron Scooter
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 345
Thanked 1,561 Times in 524 Posts
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^not necessarily. thanks to the fact that its D4-S rather D4.
If you leave alone the DI charge via ECU and run a piggy-back that controls only the port injection and/or auxiliary ports for added fuel, you will have enough fuel at all ranges. Since we are using port to supplement the Lean DI mixtures, we don't need very large injectors to get the right EGT/AFR/LAMBDA unlike conventional EFI engines.

My recommendations are small (250cc-370cc)RC engineering Peak & Hold unsaturated injectors with inline fuel controller.
__________________
WingsofWar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 05:55 PM   #8
Spaceywilly
ZC6A2B82KC7J
 
Spaceywilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2002 WRX
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 361
Thanked 727 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrk View Post
Not knowing anything about Subaru, I'd like to hear more about this. But I recognize that we need an appropriate, separate thread for it. (And I don't want to appear that I am hating for hating's sake. I just want to learn the pro's and con's of Subaru.)
I'd be curious too. I've owned a Subaru for 4 years and this is the first I've heard of anyone hating them. In fact, Subaru engines seem to be a really popular swap into Boxsters and mid-engined kits. I'm planning to swap an EJ207 if it's easy enough. It's a proven platform instead of the new engine which is a big question mark at this point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WingsofWar View Post
^not necessarily. thanks to the fact that its D4-S rather D4.
If you leave alone the DI charge via ECU and run a piggy-back that controls only the port injection and/or auxiliary ports for added fuel, you will have enough fuel at all ranges. Since we are using port to supplement the Lean DI mixtures, we don't need very large injectors to get the right EGT/AFR/LAMBDA unlike conventional EFI engines.

My recommendations are small (250cc-370cc)RC engineering Peak & Hold unsaturated injectors with inline fuel controller.
Has anyone had any luck tuning the other d4-s engines?
__________________

Straights are for fast cars. Turns are for fast drivers.
Spaceywilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 03:00 AM   #9
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I think no D4-S engine has ever been turboed before...based off a quick search on google. Toyota ECUs seem to be pretty hard to hack into or something :O Makes me wonder how exactly people are going to tune this for forced induction.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 03:11 AM   #10
70NYD
Senior Member
 
70NYD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: RX8 S1
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If they stay true to their word, keepin this car a enthusiasts car, they won't make it hard to hack, hell it might even be slightly programable, whose to say for now.
General rule of thumb for a high comp high rev engine, with stoc internals you are looking at more than likely 12psi tops and thats being generous. But that's not to say you won't see good power improvements from that, remember that this will/should be a good engine to start with. A safe tune for a NA->FI engine is around 9psi
__________________
70NYD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 03:23 AM   #11
KaliKev
FT86 News Addict
 
KaliKev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: Toyota FJ
Location: United States
Posts: 386
Thanks: 3
Thanked 42 Times in 26 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So at 9 psi how much extra horsepower would you expect?
KaliKev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 06:04 AM   #12
CyberFormula
Senior Member
 
CyberFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: gti, nsx, integra type r,porsche911
Location: garage
Posts: 536
Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
a maxed out engine out of the box doesnt' sound bad to me
__________________
CyberFormula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 07:18 AM   #13
70NYD
Senior Member
 
70NYD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: RX8 S1
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaliKev View Post
So at 9 psi how much extra horsepower would you expect?
Ideally you are adding 1.6 times of air/fuel over atmo so ideally you are looking at 60%~ more power, but that's ideally and it depends where you want that boost to be. You will either get a more from the get go with low lag and end up choking your exhaust high up and making heat, or you will have more power later.
In reality you can get about ~40% more if boost is where your peak power was originally, but I can't stress enough about this not needing it of it's light and nimble as promised. If anything, a turbo that is at full boost at 5-6krpm and a redline of 8-9 is perfect for track for small car like this. Otherwise you will be smoking tires and feathering the throttle. That's my opinion, but I'd prefer a screaming NA, or a centrifugal charger or turbo with very low boost (like 5-7psi if anything)
__________________
70NYD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 10:51 AM   #14
suprachica79
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: free Hyundai, 2006 Kawasaki ZX6R
Location: CT
Posts: 572
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70NYD View Post
Ideally you are adding 1.6 times of air/fuel over atmo so ideally you are looking at 60%~ more power, but that's ideally and it depends where you want that boost to be. You will either get a more from the get go with low lag and end up choking your exhaust high up and making heat, or you will have more power later.
In reality you can get about ~40% more if boost is where your peak power was originally, but I can't stress enough about this not needing it of it's light and nimble as promised. If anything, a turbo that is at full boost at 5-6krpm and a redline of 8-9 is perfect for track for small car like this. Otherwise you will be smoking tires and feathering the throttle. That's my opinion, but I'd prefer a screaming NA, or a centrifugal charger or turbo with very low boost (like 5-7psi if anything)
Even with 40% increase in power you're talking 200hp to 280hp in a car that should weigh less than 2700lbs. That's pretty awesome
suprachica79 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.