follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-16-2017, 03:18 PM   #1
JermMX5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: NH
Posts: 124
Thanks: 13
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
2017 Toyota 86 Baseline Dyno vs OFT Stage 1

Hello Guys!

As many of you know I have been working on getting my car to the dyno to get a baseline before I started to do mods to it, and in that time I got the OFT and decided it would be a great chance to see if the stage 1 does anything so with out further wait here are the results with explanation below:

Name:  Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg
Views: 8000
Size:  846.8 KB

So run number 1 is with the bone stock car on the bone stock tune. It made 177HP and 140TQ. There was a run number 2 also on the bone stock tune, but was in 4th gear to see if that would do better than 5th or not, it only made about 171HP so he stuck with 5th.

Run 3 was the first with the OFT Stage 1. He was light on the throttle at the begining of the pull to make sure it wasn't going to pull timing because of just flashing it (we did let it idle for about 2 minutes and went up through the range slowly). Here we see a peak of 181HP and 141TQ. Run 2 is the green line and has the worst dip because he wasn't full on the throttle (take a look at AFR ).

Then finally we had another OFT pull that made 179HP and 139TQ on run 4. Run 4 is the Red line.

The main point of today was just to get a baseline before I started modding, I knew the stage 1 wouldn't make uber amounts of power, but I was hoping for something in the dip area, as we can can it made maybe 1-2 ft-lbs at the 3500-4000 range and again from 5000 to 7000.

I had forgotten to log the stock pulls, but here is the log for run 3: http://datazap.me/u/jermmx5/2017-toy...53&tmax=231.40

And here is run 4: http://datazap.me/u/jermmx5/2017-toy...20&tmax=291.21

Overall I'm happy that the OFT game me 2-4 HP up top. And on the dyno, the commanded AFR and the actual AFR actual look really close compared to when I log on the road in 3rd the commanded being 12.12 and the actual being 11.02.
__________________
2017 Toyota 86 - Whiteline 20mm Front Bar | Crash Bolts | 235/45/17 RE-71R | 17x7.5 OZ Omnia | OFT Stage 1 For Street Driving | Trackpipe for AutoX | Not enough camber.
JermMX5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JermMX5 For This Useful Post:
HachiRolle (08-16-2017), SuperTom (08-17-2017)
Old 08-16-2017, 04:40 PM   #2
Vin
Senior Member
 
Vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: 2012 GT86 EU-spec
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 204
Thanks: 232
Thanked 149 Times in 99 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks for sharing this I think this shows the 2017 tune is already pretty optimized as the gain on stage 1 is less than on the 2012-2017 models. The gain you see is within the margin of error of doing back to back pulls.
__________________
Vin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vin For This Useful Post:
JazzleSAURUS (08-18-2017)
Old 08-16-2017, 05:28 PM   #3
Somerandom18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 2017 manual BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 467
Thanks: 322
Thanked 178 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hmmmm...

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Somerandom18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 06:09 PM   #4
nocoolname
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 66
Thanks: 17
Thanked 45 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'd be interested to see what the stage 1 put down after driving the car a couple hundred miles after flashing.
__________________
2001 MR-S - long, slow, rebuild
2000 MR-S - 2zz swapped daily
2013 BRZ limited - new toy
nocoolname is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nocoolname For This Useful Post:
lantsalot (08-16-2017)
Old 08-16-2017, 06:41 PM   #5
JermMX5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: NH
Posts: 124
Thanks: 13
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nocoolname View Post
I'd be interested to see what the stage 1 put down after driving the car a couple hundred miles after flashing.
Take a look at the fuel trims in the logs... It's not like there's some magic dust that rains down after you drive on a tune for a while, you have to let it idle for a bit to learn the fueling and then going light throttle through all the rev range is going to sort out your fuel trims as evident by the log.
__________________
2017 Toyota 86 - Whiteline 20mm Front Bar | Crash Bolts | 235/45/17 RE-71R | 17x7.5 OZ Omnia | OFT Stage 1 For Street Driving | Trackpipe for AutoX | Not enough camber.
JermMX5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 07:39 PM   #6
Jasonb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: 17 Series Yellow BRZ
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 190
Thanks: 20
Thanked 47 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Do you plan on getting a header and using a stage 2 tune?
Jasonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 08:14 PM   #7
JermMX5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: NH
Posts: 124
Thanks: 13
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonb View Post
Do you plan on getting a header and using a stage 2 tune?
Yup my plan is to move to STX next year, but I really want all that power first (Yes I know suspension will be more competitive lol) but I want a little more oomph on the street so I'm going to probably go tomei UEL, perin OP, and Concept G.

Once I get everything in place at the end of winter I'll dyno again with the same place to see what kind of improvements the 2017 can make on the OFT Stage 2+
__________________
2017 Toyota 86 - Whiteline 20mm Front Bar | Crash Bolts | 235/45/17 RE-71R | 17x7.5 OZ Omnia | OFT Stage 1 For Street Driving | Trackpipe for AutoX | Not enough camber.
JermMX5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JermMX5 For This Useful Post:
imnotsureaboutbrz (08-17-2017), Jasonb (08-16-2017)
Old 08-17-2017, 12:47 AM   #8
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JermMX5 View Post
Take a look at the fuel trims in the logs... It's not like there's some magic dust that rains down after you drive on a tune for a while, you have to let it idle for a bit to learn the fueling and then going light throttle through all the rev range is going to sort out your fuel trims as evident by the log.
The car doesn't learn trims for WOT from idle.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 08:49 AM   #9
JermMX5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: NH
Posts: 124
Thanks: 13
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
The car doesn't learn trims for WOT from idle.
Based on your experience, I'm inclined to believe you, but if there was no fuel trims, and I was hitting my AFR targets, then what would more learning do?
__________________
2017 Toyota 86 - Whiteline 20mm Front Bar | Crash Bolts | 235/45/17 RE-71R | 17x7.5 OZ Omnia | OFT Stage 1 For Street Driving | Trackpipe for AutoX | Not enough camber.
JermMX5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 12:03 PM   #10
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
The car doesn't learn trims for WOT from idle.
WOT is in closed loop anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JermMX5 View Post
then what would more learning do?
Nothing
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 04:38 PM   #11
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
logs show after about 7100 the commanded afr goes from about 12 to 10.6 (and the measured afr follows that so it doing what its asked) . You can see the big step in AFR here


http://datazap.me/u/jermmx5/2017-toy...20&tmax=291.21






If that AFR continued around 12 all the way to redline you would probably pick up a few more hp, although it not an area you drive in a lot. assuming knock didn't start


but would make the "gain" look better.


looks like a soft rpm limiter stats to cut in about 7400 as the ignition timing drops off sharply after that

Last edited by steve99; 08-17-2017 at 04:51 PM.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 07:05 PM   #12
JermMX5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: NH
Posts: 124
Thanks: 13
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
logs show after about 7100 the commanded afr goes from about 12 to 10.6 (and the measured afr follows that so it doing what its asked) . You can see the big step in AFR here


http://datazap.me/u/jermmx5/2017-toy...20&tmax=291.21






If that AFR continued around 12 all the way to redline you would probably pick up a few more hp, although it not an area you drive in a lot. assuming knock didn't start


but would make the "gain" look better.


looks like a soft rpm limiter stats to cut in about 7400 as the ignition timing drops off sharply after that
In autocross I'm actually there most of the time on open courses lol, and why do you think it dropped so much? It actually kinda looks like the table does in the rom, well except the sudden change. Do you think learning would have helped that?

Name:  AFR.JPG
Views: 6337
Size:  142.5 KB
__________________
2017 Toyota 86 - Whiteline 20mm Front Bar | Crash Bolts | 235/45/17 RE-71R | 17x7.5 OZ Omnia | OFT Stage 1 For Street Driving | Trackpipe for AutoX | Not enough camber.
JermMX5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 07:17 PM   #13
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JermMX5 View Post
In autocross I'm actually there most of the time on open courses lol, and why do you think it dropped so much? It actually kinda looks like the table does in the rom, well except the sudden change. Do you think learning would have helped that?

Attachment 157222

Theirs more fueling tables in the 2017 roms they don't work the same ( ie different logic) as the 2012-2016.


you will find 2 ol fuel tables Primary OL A and B and primary additive A and B and hopefully another table called something like "power AFR" or WOT AFR, you need to adjust that one as well, im not sure the opensoruce guys have defined those yet


Im not 100% on how the ecu uses the additional fuel tables but it appears to pick the richest of the three under WOT conditions


If you don't have all those tables in the definition then the ecu is likely using tables you cannot see


I don't think learning will help unless your LTFT is high
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 07:20 PM   #14
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JermMX5 View Post
In autocross I'm actually there most of the time on open courses lol, and why do you think it dropped so much? It actually kinda looks like the table does in the rom, well except the sudden change. Do you think learning would have helped that?
My guess is it switched from closed loop to open loop fuelling.

There are some misconceptions about learning:
- It only helps if the tune is "off" when freshly flashed.
- Learning can also be detrimential if a tune that initially produces good values has some errors that causes the ECU to learn wrong fuel trims over time.

If the tune is perfect when freshly flashed no learning is required at all. The time the ECU spends in closed loop, learning doesn't matter at all.
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Baseline Dyno Results JJJ Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 2 06-23-2015 06:49 PM
Baseline Dyno runs at VIP performance: 2015 FR-S sachu Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 0 01-10-2015 10:32 PM
Product Testing : FREE Dyno Baseline? Drift-Office Northwest 12 04-10-2013 07:45 PM
Dyno results, ONLY mod Nameless Downpipe. (Yes, I know, no baseline....) Sportsguy83 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 53 03-19-2013 12:39 PM
Baseline dyno test today on my new BRZ Those Meddling Kids Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 2 08-25-2012 10:52 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.