follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2019, 06:23 PM   #1
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Case study comparing the Ace header against a popular UEL header with FI

First dyno:
2017 MT (205hp base motor, new red manifold, etc.)
UEL header w/ ceramic
JRSC C38 w/ High Boost Pulley

Graphs:
baseline (stock)
ACN91
E55 (MBT, aka no more power to be made with more ethanol)




Second dyno:
2013 MT
Ace A350 header w/ CSG double ceramic
JRSC C30 w/ standard pulley and High Boost Pulley

Graphs:
baseline (stock)
E85 SBP
E85 HBP







Overlaid (combined) graphs w/ identifiers for comparison.




Conclusions: Smaller supercharger (C30) with less boost (~2psi less), makes more power (+35whp, +25wtq), due to the Ace header. The C30 + standard pulley + Ace header makes more power and more area under the curve than the C38 + high boost pulley + UEL header!

Both cars dyno tuned by Zach Tucker of CSG.


Imagine a C38 + HBP + Ace header...
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
brybot (11-01-2019), gtengr (10-12-2019), mrg666 (10-14-2019)
Old 10-11-2019, 07:18 PM   #2
weederr33
Airborne at your service
 
weederr33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '17 BRZ Series.Yellow
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 6,326
Thanks: 4,529
Thanked 5,587 Times in 2,929 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
No offense, but do we really need another thread reminding us the ACE header makes the most power? Otherwise, that output is very impressive!
__________________
Series.Yellowbird - http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=122135

MS, CSCS, TSAC-F, CPT
weederr33 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to weederr33 For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (10-15-2019), sroby (10-13-2019)
Old 10-12-2019, 01:38 AM   #3
colushi808
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 22
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Did you ever compare the different ace headers with boost? Is the 350 the best for boosted? I seen on their website that says the crossfire is for forced induction.

I also can't figure out that different size wheels and gear ratios would affect whp and call for a different header.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
colushi808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2019, 09:50 AM   #4
DarkPira7e
Rust bucket enthusiast
 
DarkPira7e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2013 Turbo Firestorm FRS
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,934
Thanks: 3,200
Thanked 4,095 Times in 2,045 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by colushi808 View Post
Did you ever compare the different ace headers with boost? Is the 350 the best for boosted? I seen on their website that says the crossfire is for forced induction.

I also can't figure out that different size wheels and gear ratios would affect whp and call for a different header.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
Wheel, tires and gear ratios are all hearing. Gearing is how power is delivered, not what makes power
DarkPira7e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2019, 11:20 AM   #5
colushi808
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 22
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkPira7e View Post
Wheel, tires and gear ratios are all hearing. Gearing is how power is delivered, not what makes power
Yeah that's why I dont understand ace headers website which recommends the different headers according to wheel size and gear ratios.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
colushi808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2019, 11:47 AM   #6
86TOYO2k17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2017 toyota 86
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 336
Thanked 1,188 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by colushi808 View Post
Yeah that's why I dont understand ace headers website which recommends the different headers according to wheel size and gear ratios.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
Im guessing it probably has to do with how long you stay in each gear. Longer gearing, stay in each gear longer, a more broad powerband would be better like the 350/400. Shorter gearing, stay in each gear less, a more peaky powerband would be better like 150/250.
86TOYO2k17 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 86TOYO2k17 For This Useful Post:
gtengr (10-12-2019), tomm.brz (10-12-2019)
Old 10-12-2019, 01:16 PM   #7
why?
Only happy when it rains.
 
why?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: series.blue
Location: Harnett county NC
Posts: 1,995
Thanks: 5,698
Thanked 1,263 Times in 749 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by weederr33 View Post
No offense, but do we really need another thread reminding us the ACE header makes the most power? Otherwise, that output is very impressive!
What I really want to see is an ACE header vs a Ptuning header, both tuned by Zach. For whatever reason PTuning always is ignored.
why? is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to why? For This Useful Post:
J1Avs (10-12-2019)
Old 10-12-2019, 02:55 PM   #8
J1Avs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Drives: 2018 BRZ tS
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 396
Thanks: 239
Thanked 232 Times in 125 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by why? View Post
What I really want to see is an ACE header vs a Ptuning header, both tuned by Zach. For whatever reason PTuning always is ignored.
Or an ACE Header tuned by Zach and the PTuning header tuned by Toan but on the same dyno/same time -- as CSG uses a Dynojet and PTuning uses a Dyno Dynamics.

I've read that Dyno Dynamics is heart-breaker compared to a Dynojet, so I'd be quite interested to see what my tS with a JRSC C30/PTuning Header/JDL UQFP/E85 setup would do on a Dynojet. For reference, on PTuning's Dyno Dynamics I put down 307whp/230ft-lbs on a 90+degree day.
J1Avs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2019, 05:48 PM   #9
weederr33
Airborne at your service
 
weederr33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '17 BRZ Series.Yellow
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 6,326
Thanks: 4,529
Thanked 5,587 Times in 2,929 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by why? View Post
What I really want to see is an ACE header vs a Ptuning header, both tuned by Zach. For whatever reason PTuning always is ignored.
I want to see the Nameless header but no one likes it lol. And it's discontinued. Or the HKS header. I don't need no fancy ACE header and sure as hell don't like UEL sounds. But I feel ya!
__________________
Series.Yellowbird - http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=122135

MS, CSCS, TSAC-F, CPT
weederr33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2019, 07:33 PM   #10
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by why? View Post
What I really want to see is an ACE header vs a Ptuning header, both tuned by Zach. For whatever reason PTuning always is ignored.
We've seen Ptuning and Ace, both tuned by Shawn Church, and the same story as usual. NA, Same peak power, area under the curve is won by Ace, by a mile.

I haven't seen an apple to apples comparison FI yet.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
why? (10-13-2019)
Old 10-12-2019, 07:36 PM   #11
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by J1Avs View Post
Or an ACE Header tuned by Zach and the PTuning header tuned by Toan but on the same dyno/same time -- as CSG uses a Dynojet and PTuning uses a Dyno Dynamics.

I've read that Dyno Dynamics is heart-breaker compared to a Dynojet, so I'd be quite interested to see what my tS with a JRSC C30/PTuning Header/JDL UQFP/E85 setup would do on a Dynojet. For reference, on PTuning's Dyno Dynamics I put down 307whp/230ft-lbs on a 90+degree day.
CSG has a Dynapack in-house, and also often uses TRL's Dynojet.

While the dynos themselves can't be directly compared, when you always provide a baseline, you can very much overlay the baseline to get a semi-accurate comparison, as well as compare the % gain, which is what truly matters.

For reference, the TRL Dynojet reads exactly how a Dynojet should read, and is accurate for NASA Dynojet numbers. You can take whp numbers, divide by 0.88, and get accurate crank numbers. A stock FA20 reads ~175whp on this dyno

The CSG Dynapack reads lower, and you can take CSG whp numbers, divide by 0.75, and get accurate crank numbers. A stock FA20 reads ~150whp on this dyno.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2019, 08:29 PM   #12
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rod breaking power is available without the Ace, but thanks for the data.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2019, 09:14 PM   #13
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I would like to see the ACE vs UEL catless vs OEM Decat (hammer and screwdriver).

Same car, same tuner (hopefully a good one), same dyno, same conditions, same fuel.

All on an NA engine where the pipe length, diameter, velocity, collector design and pulses really mean more in design than a boosted application where blow down is seen.

All by a independent place that doesn't sell aftermarket parts.

Disclaimer: I'm no expert, I just like fluid and thermal dynamics and their part in making power.

I would also like to see some traps and mph for each test.

From my experience there is generally a difference in claims when the tyres are on the blacktop.

Marketing is a magical thing.
__________________
Disclaimer: This post represents the official views of the voices in my head at the time of posting.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133311
I'm only here for the biscuits
86MLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2019, 10:40 PM   #14
mswbrz
Senior Member
 
mswbrz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: 2013 brz limited / galaxy blue
Location: Oakdale
Posts: 230
Thanks: 151
Thanked 66 Times in 43 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So many peeps salty bout the Ace being heads above the rest ..... thanks again for the validation of me buying the right header/ tune for my Fi brz


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mswbrz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JDL UEL header/Nameless header-back exhaust (Atlanta area) carbon_raven Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 16 05-09-2015 02:26 AM
Who has Open Flash Header (or aftermarket UEL header) in the GTA with stock exhaust? alanhung85 CANADA 6 10-21-2014 10:41 PM
RevWorks UEL Header + Nameless Catted Front Pipe VS Stock Gutted Header + FP NickFRS Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 44 04-19-2014 05:42 PM
Top Gear Solutions| HKS Header |Borla EL & UEL Headers| Agency Power Header| + MORE! TopGearSolutions Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 82 04-14-2014 08:16 PM
Drift-Office : Vortech SC with and without Header - Case Study / Discussion? Drift-Office Forced Induction 14 09-27-2013 09:16 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.