follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2018, 12:53 PM   #99
cjd
Senior Member
 
cjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,285
Thanks: 1,256
Thanked 2,928 Times in 1,714 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2 View Post
So I'm wondering if something that lessens the torque dip from the top of the motor ie power blocks will have the ecu pull timing after a while?
Longer runners are good for low(er) rpm power - there is a direct correlating loss at high(er) rpm typically. I vaguely recall less impact with e85, so there's something in there that may allow more timing as well. Also don't remember noticing that power blocks do anything with the torque dip. That said, I'd not anticipate it causing timing to be pulled over time. I had a car with dual runners, and the longer runner ran from ~3000-5600rpm and the short runners everywhere else. At low rpm I guess runner length wasn't the primary benefit, but the volume change helped. Short runners were valved, long side not (always open).

I do suspect the torque dip is harmonics related based on the handful of things observed to change it, but I don't have the experience or background to be particularly confident.

I wonder if a dual catted Ace 4-2-1 would perform nearly as well, but that's a wild curiosity that'll never be answered.
__________________
Second chance build... or whatever it is.
cjd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 01:03 PM   #100
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
I think it was the MR2, Supra, Corrola and Celica, and from Lexus, the LFA, LC500, ISF, GSF, RCF, SC Soarer and SC430 and from Scion the tC which is a stretch.
These Toyota cars were a long time ago. There wasn't any real sports car offering before our platform. Why do you think they contact Subaru? At that time they were selling mainly small cars, hybrids, mini-vans and they had a strong ecological heritage. I don't consider Lexus a performance brand, but mainly a premium or luxury brand. The LFA is an exemption and the motor was developed with the help of Yamaha. So, not entirely a Toyota product.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 01:54 PM   #101
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
These Toyota cars were a long time ago. There wasn't any real sports car offering before our platform. Why do you think they contact Subaru? At that time they were selling mainly small cars, hybrids, mini-vans and they had a strong ecological heritage. I don't consider Lexus a performance brand, but mainly a premium or luxury brand. The LFA is an exemption and the motor was developed with the help of Yamaha. So, not entirely a Toyota product.
Right, most of those models ended in the early to mid 2000’s after the Asian market crisis in the late 90’s and then the 2008 market collapse made sure sports cars would be rare, hence sport luxury sedans. The Lexus F line is like BMW’s M line, so pretty sporty, and they have been produced through the sports car hiatus.

Regardless, your point is that going forward Toyota will be producing sports cars with torque dips designed in their motors to give those motors economy and performance. I guess we will see when the new Supra comes out if there is a dip.

Of course the other explanation is that the torque dip is there as a byproduct of the other engineered components, and that the easiest thing to do is to market the dip as an intentional design to maximize fuel efficiency around town.
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 02:23 PM   #102
bfrank1972
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S Argento
Location: Westport,CT
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 517
Thanked 1,039 Times in 616 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjd View Post
Longer runners are good for low(er) rpm power - there is a direct correlating loss at high(er) rpm typically. I vaguely recall less impact with e85, so there's something in there that may allow more timing as well. Also don't remember noticing that power blocks do anything with the torque dip. That said, I'd not anticipate it causing timing to be pulled over time. I had a car with dual runners, and the longer runner ran from ~3000-5600rpm and the short runners everywhere else. At low rpm I guess runner length wasn't the primary benefit, but the volume change helped. Short runners were valved, long side not (always open).

I do suspect the torque dip is harmonics related based on the handful of things observed to change it, but I don't have the experience or background to be particularly confident.

I wonder if a dual catted Ace 4-2-1 would perform nearly as well, but that's a wild curiosity that'll never be answered.
Longer runners effectively compress the power band, one thing you'll see is the torque dip will get a little narrower, which helps with normal shift points as well as overall less rpm range where the engine is down on power. I suspect the thing with e85 and power blocks is that it can't take advantage of some of the changes as timing can always pretty much be optimal with e85. With pump, timing retard near the top end can be lessened when adding power blocks - above 6500 rpm you're starting to get out of optimal VE, cylinder pressures are less, which gives more room to advance timing from where it was before the blocks. That's where with careful tuning you can regain nearly all the top end losses introduced by the longer runners.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
bfrank1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 02:23 PM   #103
Harey
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 70
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I don't understand how this is still a discussion?? 100% standard car, remove internals of cat in header and torque dip is gone.
Harey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 05:25 PM   #104
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2 View Post
So I'm wondering if something that lessens the torque dip from the top of the motor ie power blocks will have the ecu pull timing after a while?

If its tuned correctly the ecu should rarely have to intervene to pull timing, during normal operation with correct fuel
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (02-24-2018)
Old 02-24-2018, 06:03 PM   #105
Lantanafrs2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
If its tuned correctly the ecu should rarely have to intervene to pull timing, during normal operation with correct fuel
Steve, are you running f.i. now? I'm thinking about doing it eventually and try to follow your posts because you know your business.
Lantanafrs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 08:41 PM   #106
NRXRaptor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: BRZ
Location: Mendocino County
Posts: 369
Thanks: 7
Thanked 96 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
I guess we will see when the new Supra comes out if there is a dip.
I'm pretty sure the new supra is literally a re-skinned BMW M4
NRXRaptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 10:29 PM   #107
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
These Toyota cars were a long time ago. There wasn't any real sports car offering before our platform. Why do you think they contact Subaru? At that time they were selling mainly small cars, hybrids, mini-vans and they had a strong ecological heritage. I don't consider Lexus a performance brand, but mainly a premium or luxury brand. The LFA is an exemption and the motor was developed with the help of Yamaha. So, not entirely a Toyota product.
They contacted Subaru because they want to minimize their cost and maximize their profits.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 11:01 PM   #108
Teseo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: frs
Location: Gunsai
Posts: 4,877
Thanks: 7,153
Thanked 2,922 Times in 1,769 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Wow... this thread escalated so badly. From header and tune to blaming toyota. To keep on topic, a paper with a graph mean shit to op as long he is pleased on real scenario, in his case autocross. So im waiting patiently for his impressions /video
Teseo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Teseo For This Useful Post:
justinco (02-24-2018)
Old 02-24-2018, 11:54 PM   #109
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teseo View Post
Wow... this thread escalated so badly. From header and tune to blaming toyota. To keep on topic, a paper with a graph mean shit to op as long he is pleased on real scenario, in his case autocross. So im waiting patiently for his impressions /video
We are exploring the possible source of the torque dip, while addressing the fact that this header and tune fixes it, while considering other means of sorting out the torque dip. It is not a one dimensional conversation, that is true, but it is good conversation nevertheless.

————-

Anyone have the other Ace headers dyno tuned side by side?
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post:
SuperTom (04-29-2018)
Old 02-25-2018, 08:54 AM   #110
tennisfreak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2018 BMW M240i
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 692
Thanked 917 Times in 538 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by NRXRaptor View Post
I'm pretty sure the new supra is literally a re-skinned BMW M4
I'm pretty sure you are dead wrong.

There is a decent chance it will have the B58 inline turbo 6 the current m240i has in it.

Other than that its a new platform that is shared with the z4/5
tennisfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tennisfreak For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (02-25-2018)
Old 02-25-2018, 01:18 PM   #111
EAGLE5
Dismember
 
EAGLE5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,557
Thanks: 2,152
Thanked 3,999 Times in 2,155 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
OH SHIT! Somebody on the internet is wrong.
EAGLE5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to EAGLE5 For This Useful Post:
bfrank1972 (02-25-2018), CSG Mike (02-26-2018), Summerwolf (02-25-2018)
Old 02-26-2018, 10:16 AM   #112
Kordless
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Drives: '13 BRZ Limited
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 366
Thanks: 42
Thanked 68 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan Silveira View Post
Man I wish I could test drive your car. I'm dying to know what a tune from Delicious and headers from Ace or elsewhere would do to this car.
You are in LA, I'm in LA... Hahahah lets make this happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bfrank1972 View Post
lol this statement implies you have driven an 86 configured with every other header on the market
I've owned my fair share of all the popular ones. Tomei, JDL, Nameless.

I've driven others, Ft86speedfactory, Borla, Fujitsubo etc.

I should've changed my statement from all other to just the popular ones. I have not driven some crazy rare japanese headers or every single header out there, but definitely the most popular ones
Kordless is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kordless For This Useful Post:
bfrank1972 (02-26-2018), CSG Mike (02-26-2018)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Nameless header dyno results (results to follow) Simply_the_best Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 39 06-28-2016 04:09 PM
Australian Dyno Dyno Results Shiv@Openflash Software Tuning 11 07-22-2015 04:57 AM
86 Dyno results Anban AFRICA 18 01-14-2014 06:54 AM
Dyno Compilation - dyno testing results and recommendations Illusive Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 82 02-08-2013 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.