follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2018, 11:32 AM   #99
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I haven't seen V4, and didn't read this whole thread yet, but if Shiv has set IAM to 0.7 then I'd wager it's by design and whether the car runs at 1.0 or 0.5, it's working as exactly as intended with full power.

Meaning between that file and previous files where the timing has been adjusted so that IAM doesn't drop, the difference in timing is going to be fuck all.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post:
Teseo (04-14-2018)
Old 04-14-2018, 06:42 PM   #100
Jasonb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: 17 Series Yellow BRZ
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 190
Thanks: 20
Thanked 47 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
I haven't seen V4, and didn't read this whole thread yet, but if Shiv has set IAM to 0.7 then I'd wager it's by design and whether the car runs at 1.0 or 0.5, it's working as exactly as intended with full power.

Meaning between that file and previous files where the timing has been adjusted so that IAM doesn't drop, the difference in timing is going to be fuck all.
So you're saying it won't make less power at .7, than at 1.0? That can't be true.
Jasonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018, 09:05 PM   #101
coxxoc
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 46
Thanks: 5
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonb View Post
So you're saying it won't make less power at .7, than at 1.0? That can't be true.
I'm pretty sure what he means is the ECU would have pulled timing before if the map was too aggressive for the fuel being used. If the engine couldn't handle 1.0 IAM before, it won't be able to handle it now. Starting at 0.7 will reduce timing for a short time. The IAM value should go up to 1.0 during operation so long as knock events aren't detected.

If you want to start out running max timing and the ECU pull it if knock events occur, change "Ignition Timing -Knock Control > Advance Multiplier (Initial)" to 1.0000. This only applies to the gasoline ROMs. The E85 ROMs stayed at 1.0 initial IAM since it isn't as knock prone.
coxxoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018, 09:34 PM   #102
Jasonb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: 17 Series Yellow BRZ
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 190
Thanks: 20
Thanked 47 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by coxxoc View Post
I'm pretty sure what he means is the ECU would have pulled timing before if the map was too aggressive for the fuel being used. If the engine couldn't handle 1.0 IAM before, it won't be able to handle it now. Starting at 0.7 will reduce timing for a short time. The IAM value should go up to 1.0 during operation so long as knock events aren't detected.

If you want to start out running max timing and the ECU pull it if knock events occur, change "Ignition Timing -Knock Control > Advance Multiplier (Initial)" to 1.0000. This only applies to the gasoline ROMs. The E85 ROMs stayed at 1.0 initial IAM since it isn't as knock prone.
On the V4 tune I'm using I set it at .9 so it takes less time to get to 1.0. I always have 93 available. Still safer than starting at 1, but I get more power right away, and max power sooner.
Jasonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018, 09:58 PM   #103
coxxoc
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 46
Thanks: 5
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonb View Post
On the V4 tune I'm using I set it at .9 so it takes less time to get to 1.0. I always have 93 available. Still safer than starting at 1, but I get more power right away, and max power sooner.
Your approach is reasonable so long as logs aren't showing IAM dropping or a significant number of knock correction events. The 0.7 is for folks with lower octane fuel since Shiv merged the 91 and 93 octane maps into one.
coxxoc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to coxxoc For This Useful Post:
Jasonb (04-15-2018), Teseo (04-15-2018)
Old 04-14-2018, 10:10 PM   #104
Yoshoobaroo
TRACKBREAD
 
Yoshoobaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,031 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonb View Post
On the V4 tune I'm using I set it at .9 so it takes less time to get to 1.0. I always have 93 available. Still safer than starting at 1, but I get more power right away, and max power sooner.


I do the same, it would take 40 mins of driving to get to .94. now it jumps to 1.0 as soon as it's warmed up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yoshoobaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yoshoobaroo For This Useful Post:
Jasonb (04-15-2018)
Old 04-15-2018, 03:14 AM   #105
Vin
Senior Member
 
Vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: 2012 GT86 EU-spec
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 204
Thanks: 232
Thanked 149 Times in 99 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If it jumps to 1.0 very quick.. Why not just set it to 1. Apparently your fuel is good enough, that's what I see the EU guys doing, the fuel is good enough and the iam is always 1 on v4, so we set it at 1 right away.
__________________
Vin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vin For This Useful Post:
Jasonb (04-15-2018)
Old 04-15-2018, 07:02 AM   #106
Jasonb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: 17 Series Yellow BRZ
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 190
Thanks: 20
Thanked 47 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
If it jumps to 1.0 very quick.. Why not just set it to 1. Apparently your fuel is good enough, that's what I see the EU guys doing, the fuel is good enough and the iam is always 1 on v4, so we set it at 1 right away.
Eventually I probably will. I was just chasing down an issue of false knock. Once I'm completely sure everything is good then I'll probably do that.
Jasonb is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jasonb For This Useful Post:
Vin (04-15-2018)
Old 04-15-2018, 11:37 AM   #107
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Vin: there always might be some exception, like filling up mid long trip not at tank one usually fills at. Or at one that has just ron 91. Imho it won't hurt to have slight safeguard left. Damn, at this point i'd love to see ecutek's multiple map switching with cruise control stick ported also in OFT. If one can put in support for some sensor/switch even if not found out how to read cruise control stick inputs, imho should be doable, as flexfuel that is possible with OFT, already switches between maps according to fuel sensor. I'd love to get my main tune, and one extra-safe one if with unknown fuel or ron 91 fill, without doing any reflashing.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 02:22 PM   #108
Vin
Senior Member
 
Vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: 2012 GT86 EU-spec
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 204
Thanks: 232
Thanked 149 Times in 99 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The safeguard is the same? The ecu has room to compensate, it will adjust according to the fuel. If your fuel at home is good enough for iam 1, I'd just set it to 1. I have ecutek but use the map switching mostly for extra features (rev match, pops, LC etc). The fuel here in Europe, at least in my area, is so constant that I don't need a safe map. If I do run out of eu98 I'll just stay away from the redline, seeing different maps for different fuel have the most timing difference above 6k rpm (like Wayne roms Ron 98 vs 100 vs 102), just let the ecu do its work this whole iam debate should get a different thread, takes the focus away from the nice results the OP had with his dyno testing.
__________________
Vin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2018, 02:58 AM   #109
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I've used the v2 maps in the past and the support of the v4 maps is not the same. The v2 maps were different per rom id and fuel type. Now he is trying to put everything in a single bag. I just don't like this change and that's all.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2018, 03:32 AM   #110
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 502
Thanked 1,070 Times in 778 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Then don't use it? or do yourself the changes there are made in the v4 directly in the v2 if you want to try it
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2018, 11:36 AM   #111
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post
Then don't use it? or do yourself the changes there are made in the v4 directly in the v2 if you want to try it


I don't use it
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2018, 12:35 PM   #112
Jasonb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: 17 Series Yellow BRZ
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 190
Thanks: 20
Thanked 47 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
They are made for 91/93 and made to work best with the UEL open flash header. So if you're using 93 and a UEL header like I am it'll work very well. Can't be a huge difference between the open flash header and the JDL.
Jasonb is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
don't read past page 1


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Willowbrook Mall Parking Lot Meets - Thursday nights - Wayne NJ Jfheisenberg NY / NJ / CT / PA 487 07-15-2021 07:27 PM
Do dynos lie? nikitopo Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 21 05-10-2017 08:32 AM
Perrin CAI - Any dynos? griffinnn Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 0 03-14-2014 04:56 AM
Fort Wayne, IN Owners? Achpoques Great Lakes 4 07-20-2013 05:35 PM
Red Scion FR-S in Fort Wayne, IN BugeyedWagon Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 3 07-22-2012 06:30 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.