New Stage 2 UEL (91-93 and E85) OTS tune files - Page 36 - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

pinetree · 05-01-2016, 04:42 PM

Hi everyone,

I know these tunes are for the OFH, but a few of us with the JDL UEL headers decided to run this tune and see if it's compatible. I never updated with my logs because I don't have Windows PC, but decided to install it on my mac.

Anyways, here's my recent data zap log running 91 oct (Shell), I know nothing about tunes other than what I've been reading on the forums. Well let me know if it looks good or if I should stick back to the old stage 2 tune. Thanks!!

http://www.datazap.me/u/pinetree/sta...=0&data=3-9-10

headlikeahole · 05-01-2016, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinetree

Hi everyone,

I know these tunes are for the OFH, but a few of us with the JDL UEL headers decided to run this tune and see if it's compatible. I never updated with my logs because I don't have Windows PC, but decided to install it on my mac.

Anyways, here's my recent data zap log running 91 oct (Shell), I know nothing about tunes other than what I've been reading on the forums. Well let me know if it looks good or if I should stick back to the old stage 2 tune. Thanks!!

http://www.datazap.me/u/pinetree/sta...=0&data=3-9-10

It's not perfect but it's ok. You're seeing just enough knock to effect the IAM but doesn't seem to be drastic (still running smoother then stock tune on 91). You should really add RPMs to your log and try 2nd and 3rd gear pulls from 2000 to redline.

eSOLOR · 05-01-2016, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headlikeahole

Typically this kind of knock will correlate to a combination of a specific engine load and rpm. In the first log you can see that your load at 7000+ was around 1.3. The reason this knock doesn't appear in the other log could be because the loads were slightly lower at those rpm.

If you are consistently seeing FLKC over 1 - 1.5 at those rpm then it might be worth pulling a bit of timing. However unless your at a track day this probably wont be an issue.

So it's okay to use this tune and leave as is? Or is there something I should be adjusting?

headlikeahole · 05-01-2016, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eSOLOR

So it's okay to use this tune and leave as is? Or is there something I should be adjusting?

Personally I would do more pulls and see if I could recreate that same knock you saw around 7000 rpm. If it was consistent then I would pull some timing in that area. If you're not comfortable with tuning then I would say just leave it as is. It's not drastic and you're probably not spending much time in that range anyway.

solidONE · 05-01-2016, 11:09 PM

I just checked out the OFH calibration and it looks to have the same IAT compensation table as factory calibration. The folder says its OFH v1.0. Is this the new one or old one?

phrosty · 05-01-2016, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by solidONE

I just checked out the OFH calibration and it looks to have the same IAT compensation table as factory calibration. The folder says its OFH v1.0. Is this the new one or old one?

Stock starts compensating around I believe 120 degrees, new OFH one starts around 80 degrees.

solidONE · 05-01-2016, 11:31 PM

Looks the same to me...

Quote:

Originally Posted by phrosty

Stock starts compensating around I believe 120 degrees, new OFH one starts around 80 degrees.

steve99 · 05-01-2016, 11:34 PM

Guys,

They changed the IAT vs ignition timing compensation table not the maf temp compensation table :-)

phrosty · 05-01-2016, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by solidONE

Looks the same to me...

The correct table is "Timing Compensation (IAT)".

solidONE · 05-01-2016, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve99

Guys,

They changed the IAT vs ignition timing compensation table not the maf temp compensation table :-)

Oh... lol

Bzives · 05-04-2016, 09:57 AM

How big of a difference is it between the OFT stage 1 93 tune with stock header and the stage 2 93 UEL tune? I'm getting the Header near the end of May and wondering how noticeable its going to be..

NyC Zn6 · 05-04-2016, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bzives

How big of a difference is it between the OFT stage 1 93 tune with stock header and the stage 2 93 UEL tune? I'm getting the Header near the end of May and wondering how noticeable its going to be..

Night and day. Header is best bang for the buck.

Noxcyn · 05-04-2016, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NyC Zn6

Night and day. Header is best bang for the buck.

Plus that sound tho... I drive a lot with no music just listening to the UEL 😍

Dru670 · 05-04-2016, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NyC Zn6

Night and day. Header is best bang for the buck.

first of all you will fall inlove with the sound and the power from 1st to 2nd and 3rd oooowweeee (and that's with my cheap 1320 UEL header. Those with big brand name headers probably get power close to turbo with their 600+ dollar headers lol jk)

05-01-2016, 11:09 PM	#495
solidONE Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Drives: FR-S Whiteout Location: California Posts: 2,863 Thanks: 1,808 Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts Mentioned: 42 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I just checked out the OFH calibration and it looks to have the same IAT compensation table as factory calibration. The folder says its OFH v1.0. Is this the new one or old one? __________________ Intent > Content cowardice is the mother of cruelty.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Just how noticeable is OFT+OFH and stage 2 tune?	BBYZILA	Software Tuning	58	03-20-2018 12:56 PM
OFT 2.0 Stage 1 93 Tune	MurderRider	Software Tuning	57	03-21-2016 01:30 AM
Top Gear Solutions\| OpenFlash Tablet Tune\| Stage 1 Tune, Stage 2, Custom and E85	TopGearSolutions	Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons	90	04-14-2014 09:15 PM
FA20club.com Turnaround Times On Modified Tune Files	FR-S Matt	Software Tuning	103	11-13-2013 02:48 PM
So whate does stage 3 tune do? I already have 2	Frsexxxy	Engine, Exhaust, Transmission	17	05-14-2013 07:30 AM

05-01-2016, 04:42 PM	#491
pinetree Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited Location: Arizona Posts: 57 Thanks: 16 Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Hi everyone, I know these tunes are for the OFH, but a few of us with the JDL UEL headers decided to run this tune and see if it's compatible. I never updated with my logs because I don't have Windows PC, but decided to install it on my mac. Anyways, here's my recent data zap log running 91 oct (Shell), I know nothing about tunes other than what I've been reading on the forums. Well let me know if it looks good or if I should stick back to the old stage 2 tune. Thanks!! http://www.datazap.me/u/pinetree/sta...=0&data=3-9-10

05-01-2016, 11:34 PM	#498
steve99 Banned Join Date: Dec 2013 Drives: FT86 Location: Australia Posts: 7,996 Thanks: 1,035 Thanked 4,992 Times in 2,983 Posts Mentioned: 598 Post(s) Tagged: 2 Thread(s)	Guys, They changed the IAT vs ignition timing compensation table not the maf temp compensation table :-)

05-04-2016, 09:57 AM	#501
Bzives Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S Location: Toronto Posts: 45 Thanks: 12 Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	How big of a difference is it between the OFT stage 1 93 tune with stock header and the stage 2 93 UEL tune? I'm getting the Header near the end of May and wondering how noticeable its going to be..

User Name		Remember Me?
Password