|
||||||
| Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#29 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
The ratio between each gear isn't constant, so the RPM after each shift (at redline) will be different depending on the gear you're starting in.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak... flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: BRZ Premium Black
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 122
Thanks: 33
Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think it comes down to meeting targets set by the market
MT: 0-60mph faster than a GTI AT: 34mpg highway In this way they can appeal to people that are looking for good fuel economy and people looking for good acceleration. I think it's really smart. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Pro Subie Engine Nerd
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: empty spot for an FR-S/BRZ
Location: Virginia
Posts: 96
Thanks: 8
Thanked 36 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
With that being said:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2016 Subaru BRZ Hyperblue
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 8,474
Thanks: 22,733
Thanked 9,435 Times in 4,844 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
____MT ___AT __# differenc _% difference 1 _3.626 __3.538 __0.088 ____2% 2 _2.188 __2.06 ___0.128 ____6% 3 _1.541 __1.404 __0.137 ____10% 4 _1.213 __1 ______0.213 ____21% 5 _1 ______0.713 __0.287 ____40% 6 _0.767 __0.582 __0.185 ____32% R _3.437 __3.168 __0.269 ____8% F __4.100__4.100?__0.00_____0% http://www.cusco.co.jp/en/pdf/86%20BRZ%20Gears_A4.pdf http://www.cars101.com/subaru/brz/brz2016.html Last edited by p1l0t; 02-24-2016 at 11:04 AM. Reason: Oh that was reverse not final drive, haha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Track preped NA FRS
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 987
Thanks: 1,056
Thanked 681 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Holy thread necro! Yes he had the MT and Auto swapped, it was mentioned a few posts down after. The final drive is 4.1 for both auto and manual, but the ratio he was giving for R was for reverse not the final I believe.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Icecreamtruk For This Useful Post: | p1l0t (02-24-2016) |
|
|
#34 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2016 Subaru BRZ Hyperblue
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 8,474
Thanks: 22,733
Thanked 9,435 Times in 4,844 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Track preped NA FRS
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 987
Thanks: 1,056
Thanked 681 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
They are very tall indeed, but most of them are really close (except 1-2 and 2-3, damn those are apart). 6th gear is very tall on its own and a big drop from 5th, so long that the car cant pull it (maxing top speed aerodynamically rather than gear limited). A final drive swap makes it much better, at least for NA applications. For example, the car can completely pull all the way redline on 6th gear with a 4.88 or bigger FD, while tops out almost at redline with a 4.44 FD (will of course depend on elevation changes and wind direction and velocity).
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Icecreamtruk For This Useful Post: | p1l0t (02-24-2016) |
|
|
#36 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: Silver 2013 BRZ Ltd Auto 45,000 mi
Location: Vancouver, WA.USA
Posts: 965
Thanks: 86
Thanked 452 Times in 278 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
How about the difference in how it actually feels to drive each, MT and AT? The MT puts a lot more attention on the drivers skill level. Clutching, rev matching, and the rpms at shift are very important factors in the MT experience. While in the AT, suspension, tune, and how much throttle is applied contribute far more to the AT experience. The rpms at shift, when using the AT manual mode, is even more critical than in the MT, since the AT engine has less mechanical advantage than the MT in every gear, less power in other words. The gear spread is wider, and it is harder to shift and keep it above the torque dip in the AT than it is in the MT. The AT really needs two power peaks, one for cruising at low rpms, and one for accelerating at high rpms. I highly recommend a UEL header for AT's to give them two power peaks for the best DD configuration. The tune of the engine is even more critical in the AT than the MT, since the AT has so much less mechanical advantage than the MT, so the AT drivers experience more of how well they're engine is running. I drive an AT, tune it myself, and I can tell the difference between clear sky's and cloudy weather just by how the engine handles running slightly richer or leaner. I've even played with different tunes for different weather, but thought that was a bit much. There has to be a really big difference in a tune for an MT driver to tell any difference with they're "Butt Dyno", but, an AT owner can feel the slightest difference in how they're engine is running, since they feel so much more of the engine running through the taller gears. With an AT, the drivers feels good about a manual shift when the engine pulls without bogging down after the shift. With an MT, the driver feels bad about a shift when it bogs down, because that means they just shifted from 2nd to 5th, instead of from 2nd to 3rd, because shifting without bogging down is just a normal shift with an MT.
__________________
If I say yes, will that make you think I understand?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Track preped NA FRS
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 987
Thanks: 1,056
Thanked 681 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@KoolBRZ sumarized really well. Btw, I have a MT with EL headers, full exhaust and tuned. I can HEAR the difference when there's different weather (specially going from not only from wet/dry but hot/cold), but as you say, I cannot feel the difference on the butt dyno. I think I have been lucky enough to drive manual most of my life (since I was 16 in fact) and usually cars with worse trannies so I have luckily never miss shifted, on upshifts nor downshifts (i sux at rev matching tho, thats a story for another day).
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Icecreamtruk For This Useful Post: | KoolBRZ (02-25-2016) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Official BRZ MPG Numbers. Big Gear Ratio Differences? | aLiskov | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 56 | 01-16-2021 05:41 PM |
| FR-S to BRZ Ratio | MannyO | New England | 11 | 03-08-2012 03:23 AM |
| Reverse gear on the first and second gear side | randytindoggy | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 50 | 01-29-2012 02:21 PM |
| 86,BRZ MT gear ratio | Yobiwan | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 1 | 01-26-2012 03:40 AM |
| Compression ratio 12.5:1. Bye-bye Super charger & Turbo build? | fred_boosted | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 215 | 12-12-2011 08:23 PM |