![]() |
#29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Stockton CA
Posts: 171
Thanks: 2
Thanked 93 Times in 51 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
who is your sanctioning body? Or is this self ran? Is it a time attack-time trial format or is it wheel to wheel racing? What is the minimum weight off track with driver?
86 cup is a brilliant idea....but there are SO many vendors making so many different products it will be hard to pin down a specific set of approved parts to define a 86cup class that is similar to Spec E30 or Spec Miata currently the two largest "inexpensive" race series.....both are sponsored by NASA and SCCA nationally.... My thoughts are keep it STOCK STOCK STOCK....why, stock is reliable and reliable is CHEAP....simple wheel tire combo is 225 with an easily available tire (toyo offers great deals) brake pad-fluid-line upgrades only...simple shock-spring set with ajdustable sway bars so drivers can tune the car to their liking....engine totally stock with just a cat bypass and race style exhaust that can make sound even at Laguna style 92db tracks.... I would say NO aero allowed, to even things out and keep it cost effective... In wheel to wheel spec series you want it about the drivers, not who has the largest checkbook.... The biggest challenge will be defining the rule set.....since many people are building their own "track" cars with a million different parts combos so many pre built cars are gonna be pissed that theirs doesn't fit.... Another great idea to minimize costs is a reasonable dyno limit.....it seems most cars dyno at most 170whp near stock....use this or whatever is reasonable to keep full blueprint built to the limit engines from having an advantage.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,536
Thanks: 8,929
Thanked 14,183 Times in 6,838 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,536
Thanks: 8,929
Thanked 14,183 Times in 6,838 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Points are assigned on a "no budget restriction" basis. They're not perfect, but the assumption is made that a top-of-the-line off-the-shelf, readily available part will be used. There's no way to account for one-offs, and it's really meant for the weekend warrior, not guys looking for glory. Stock is NOT reliable. Not with this car. However, if you want to run in a minimal cost, minimal mod class, well, that's why we got the STOCK class. Dynos are variable. Unless we have one shop EVERYONE has to go to, it's not going to happen. You're looking at this with too much of a SCCA/NASA perspective. We don't want identical cars. The whole point of the point system is to have a lot of different cars that are roughly comparable to each other on track. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | B L U E S L A T E (12-20-2013), EN2_Squirrel (12-29-2013) |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 06 AP2 S2000
Location: San Diego,CA
Posts: 64
Thanks: 1
Thanked 37 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,536
Thanks: 8,929
Thanked 14,183 Times in 6,838 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I like the rules. Very comprehensive, but they will be a hell of a bitch to enforce. That is why I like the old set of rules, particularly for stock class.
With the old rules just check tires, make sure there is no headers, aero, weight reduction, or dampers. Boom, stock class. Simple and takes less than 2 minutes to confirm. As with the Over class... you have FI? Boom, Over class. With your new set of rules, you're going to be checking each component, adding up the points. Some of the allowed mods are difficult to confirm, such as fuel and tune. Don't get me wrong, the rules look good, but is going to take a lot of work to enforce. My offer still stands to help out when I'm at the events. Also, if you want to set up rules this way it would help to make the rules somewhat congruent with Redline or Global Time Attack rules, so if the 86 Cup driver wants to venture into other competitions they are still 100% compatible and competitive within their respective classes. PS. I'd also like to see a 1 to 1.5 pts for stock class under these rules instead of .5 pts allowed. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Have a few printed checklists and see how much time is needed to spec a car within a class. @CSG Mike @ImperiousRex what do you guys think? Irvine meet? -alex |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post: | ImperiousRex (12-24-2013), solidONE (12-24-2013) |
![]() |
#38 | |
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: California
Posts: 2,109
Thanks: 537
Thanked 1,721 Times in 956 Posts
Mentioned: 173 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG David For This Useful Post: | B L U E S L A T E (12-24-2013), ImperiousRex (12-24-2013) |
![]() |
#39 | ||
Track Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 S2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 276
Thanks: 305
Thanked 287 Times in 130 Posts
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: California
Posts: 2,109
Thanks: 537
Thanked 1,721 Times in 956 Posts
Mentioned: 173 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG David For This Useful Post: | B L U E S L A T E (12-24-2013) |
![]() |
#42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Pavement MT GR86
Location: The Berg Oregon
Posts: 959
Thanks: 146
Thanked 207 Times in 150 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Love the idea...wish auto X rules were more like this.
1000miles is too far or I would definitely sign up.
__________________
GR86 MT premium
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Classifieds rules | ZionsWrath | Site Announcements / Questions / Issues | 19 | 04-14-2014 06:40 PM |
2014 FT86CUP rules discussion | CSG Mike | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 34 | 11-18-2013 04:15 PM |
Berk Technology FT86Cup Rules/Classing Discussion | CSG Mike | Southern California | 3 | 02-22-2013 04:11 PM |