follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2011, 03:22 PM   #29
goldenfri
Senior Member
 
goldenfri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2017 BRZ Limited PP
Location: Maryland
Posts: 208
Thanks: 72
Thanked 130 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to goldenfri
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
Other than the overly soft suspension tuning of the '08 WRX, which the media portrayed with good accuracy, what's the joke?
'08 Subaru releases new WRX, '09 they add 41hp, car is pretty much the same price.

'08 224hp -> '09 265hp
goldenfri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 03:24 PM   #30
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chulooz View Post
Look up the difference between an '08 and '09 WRX, who wouldn't be envious of a later model.

The joke implies much greater things to come.
The first few results in google show a 40hp difference? A bigger one would be the Mustang GT old motor to the new one :P

That's a turbo car, change the turbo and you can (obviously) get that with exhaust changes and different turbo.

Toyota was involved in testing as well. I doubt the car will change greatly for a few years, and then the change will be a tuned model IMO.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 03:27 PM   #31
mines13
 
mines13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '13 FR-S '12 CBR1000RR
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 305
Thanked 527 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to mines13 Send a message via Yahoo to mines13
Ala S2000. the big changes were 04 (2.2) 06 DBW/traction control.
mines13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 04:55 PM   #32
MF_DEUCE
Adventure Enthusiast
 
MF_DEUCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,024
Thanks: 125
Thanked 103 Times in 58 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by igorot View Post
If the depreciation is not that bad, I may consider trading in for an upgraded version
Same. The upgrade has to be major, like night and day.
__________________
"I say why do you care what other people think about you when driving your car, why can't you just enjoy it for what it is and have fun with that?"
- Carlos Lago, Motor Trend
MF_DEUCE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 04:58 PM   #33
Longhorn248
Hook 'em
 
Longhorn248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,950
Thanks: 68
Thanked 152 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by MF_DEUCE View Post
Same. The upgrade has to be major, like night and day.
So night vision front mounted camera? That would be sweet

There would have to be significant styling modifications and an engine upgrade for me to switch cars when a newer model is released. Otherwise I plan to stick with the BRZ for at least 5-6 years.
Longhorn248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 05:14 PM   #34
Zaku
-Proud of Brzerhood-
 
Zaku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '17 BRZ CWP LMT.
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,153
Thanks: 2,717
Thanked 1,725 Times in 790 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Im not worried about it aside my FC3s every other car I've own is of it's first gen and first year. So it's nothing new, sometimes I don't like the trend where the cars of the first gen is clean looking then they get so aggressive and fat that I don't like them(Eclipse for example.) So no problem here that and you might get a lower price to buy use. Now... I hope it doesn't have big problems like say RX8 in it's first year.
__________________

"The BRZ Section's fine wine" -Zgrinch
Zaku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 05:14 PM   #35
RYU
Senior Member
 
RYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: really slow...
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 737
Thanks: 340
Thanked 253 Times in 145 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by subatoy View Post
appart from all the bugs and stuff that come from new cars/engines
I feel like the second I purchase this car they will announce a stronger version (STI maybe). I'm sure that if any turbo/supercharged versions
are being worked on, they will keep their mouths shut so that these news
won't affect initial sales.

I've waited so long for this car that I can't wait another year or so to see what happens.
I'm sure a lot of you feel the same way.
Depends if you're willing to pay extra for the STi. The reason I like this car so much is partly because of what you get for under $25k (I hope!). I'm not sure if at $30k+ i'd be willing to pay for a FI version.

It's also tough to say if a FI version will be out for this at all. Autoblog said when this motor was designed it resulted in simply no room for a turbo where traditional boxer turbos were placed. It's also a new motor with 12.5:1 compression. That is not FI friendly at all. They'd likely have to drop the compression and package it with a weirdly mounted turbo. That's basically a significant redesign.

Another option is to go SC. TRD has a strong history of using Magnuson for thier SC (I have one in my Tacoma). Packaging wise, that seems more logical but they still have to deal with the high compression issue. That won't be so easy for the dealer to handle since all TRD SC units I know of are dealer installed not factory installed.

I think FI isn't until way way way down the line.. maybe after 4th yr at least and will require engine internals to be changed.
RYU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 05:37 PM   #36
cassidy0998
Senior Member
 
cassidy0998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: '99 Ranger / '94 APU Supra / Ninja!
Location: Missississississippi
Posts: 462
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I thought about this too - but then again - I, like several others have said - have waited quite a long time for this car. And I'm only looking for a daily driver. It looks like we may see a convertible and possibly a higher performance variant coming later down the road, but neither would do me justice as far as a daily commuter goes. (I intend to have fun with the car on the side) but I won't be disappointed if a turbo model comes out or if they manage to squeeze a little more power out of the current setup.

They have been working on this car for a while, and want it to be right - They're trying to make a good impression. Every car will have its flaws from the get go, but I don't think it will be as flawed as something like the first gen GC was when it was first released.

Toyota/Subaru wants this car to have a good reputation, for many reasons.
cassidy0998 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 06:16 PM   #37
CSSM
Still Dreamin'
 
CSSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe
Location: Washington/Oregon
Posts: 656
Thanks: 88
Thanked 115 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I am a college student, I wont be looking at the sti anyway.

If there is a bug the dealer will fix it
CSSM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 06:50 PM   #38
ft86Fan
Senior Member
 
ft86Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: FR-S, Exige S, Miata
Location: Basking Ridge NJ
Posts: 798
Thanks: 327
Thanked 131 Times in 80 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mines13 View Post
Ala S2000. the big changes were 04 (2.2) 06 DBW/traction control.
So you are willing to wait 4 years? By the way, a lot of people prefer the AP1 over the AP2.
__________________
'13 Scion FR-S (Whiteout)
'07 Lotus Exige S (Aspen White) Touring, Traction, Starshield
'95 Miata (Montego Blue)
ft86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 06:52 PM   #39
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ft86Fan View Post
So you are willing to wait 4 years? By the way, a lot of people prefer the AP1 over the AP2.
And I prefered my 06 over the 04-05 and AP1s.

AP1 9000RPM redline is awesome, but the AP2s are more livable and I always beat the 05 and older cars in autocross with my DBW 06 :P
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 08:16 PM   #40
Spaceywilly
ZC6A2B82KC7J
 
Spaceywilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2002 WRX
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 361
Thanked 727 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'm going to (hopefully) buy it now because it's cheap and has plenty of power as it is. In 3 years when my warranty expires I'll be able to see what's out there for turbo kits/engine swaps or just trade it in for the STI version.

I'd rather take my own route to getting more power than waiting to see what they do to it. If you want to wait until you know you are getting the best version you will be waiting forever.
Spaceywilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 11:32 PM   #41
subatoy
Senior Member
 
subatoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: subatoy
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 667
Thanks: 32
Thanked 198 Times in 106 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
Other than the overly soft suspension tuning of the '08 WRX, which the media portrayed with good accuracy, what's the joke?
40 less HP and torque,
all the suspension bits and the wide body kit with better wheels and tires
added in 2011.
subatoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 12:01 AM   #42
Spaceywilly
ZC6A2B82KC7J
 
Spaceywilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2002 WRX
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 361
Thanked 727 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The extra 40hp from 08 to 09 was just a retune I think, the hardware was not changed. I doubt they'll suddenly discover 40 more hp in this engine next year like they did with the WRX, and if they do it should be easy enough to get a reflash (Crawford apparently already has the ability). WRX engines have always left a lot of power on the table for whatever reason and anyone can get 265hp with a simple and free open source tune. I don't think the BRZ engine will have as much potential in its stock form, but if Subaru is able to squeeze any more power out of it in future MYs, you can bet the aftermarket will be able to do the same.

From the reviews so far it sounds like there are no complaints about the suspension, and it already looks great, so I don't see what there is to wait for. If you buy it now, you will probably be looking to trade it in right around the time they are coming out with a turbo model (all indications are that it won't be anytime soon), or maybe when the turbos are just hitting the used market, so you are still better off than someone who waited a few years and then bought the mid cycle refresh just for that extra 40hp (which most people who bought right away will already be running).
Spaceywilly is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Car Buying 101 Guff Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 6 03-23-2012 07:06 AM
Why I am buying a BRZ BMWDAD BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 37 01-01-2012 10:01 PM
What do you look for when buying a sports car? Diar Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 43 09-28-2010 09:50 AM
I'm kind of afraid... VenomRush Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 106 09-14-2010 02:53 AM
I'm afraid the FT86 might be too inexpensive. BRZrkr Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 30 02-24-2010 03:45 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.