FT-86 / FR-S size dimensions compared to Genesis, Civic, Sction tC, etc

[C-Bone]

I'm sure insurance on a 2+2 is way cheaper than 2 only plus there aren't as many people in the market for a 2 seater sports car even if the 2+2 isn't much better

[aliphian]

Originally Posted by blur

Rear sear delete it is then. =)

Besides sub enclosures, what else would you guys put back there?

NNNNAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!


Although, I've seen the way you drive. You have a heavy foot, you'll blow yourself to pieces...

[OldSkoolToys]

Originally Posted by Mr.Jay

considering this car is slightly smaller than a civic I was hoping the back seats would be a decent enough for ppl to get into for short rides

I was 4 seats for sure just to have the ability if need be to drive 4 people

Think of the rears in Mk3 Supra terms....or AE86....or any other Toyota 2+2...

Yes, you can fit people in the back for short trips or long trips, doesn't really matter. No, they won't be comfortable AT ALL. The only way to be comfortable is if there's only one person riding in the back and they can sit across the seats.

When I had my Mk3 I fit 3 drunk college chicks in the back and 2 in the passenger seat. If I were a douche I would've had some 'fun'...but I'm just a nice guy helping some girls get back to their dorm.

@Rye: Yes, 2+2 is lower on insurance than strict 2 seater.

[iff2mastamatt]

I wonder if the NA version won't have rear seats, like the international Honda CR-Z compared to the US one. I think Honda's justification for the empty seats was that Americans were too "big" to sit comfortably in the back.

[blur]

Originally Posted by aliphian

NNNNAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!


Although, I've seen the way you drive. You have a heavy foot, you'll blow yourself to pieces...

Haha, what?

[Dimman]

Originally Posted by blur

Haha, what?

NOS.

[aliphian]

Originally Posted by blur

Haha, what?

It was a Fast and Furious reference. I'm sorry, I failed.

[Allch Chcar]

Originally Posted by iff2mastamatt

I wonder if the NA version won't have rear seats, like the international Honda CR-Z compared to the US one. I think Honda's justification for the empty seats was that Americans were too "big" to sit comfortably in the back.

That was a special case. Honda USA is full of idiots...

[old greg]

Well Toyota USA is badging the FT as a Scion, so there's hope.

[Kage]

Kinda suprised no ones done it yet, but anyone wanna start overlaying the mkIII? prefferable against the mki and mkii first, but also against the s2k, 370z, and the other cars that are comparable in size?

[blur]

Originally Posted by aliphian

It was a Fast and Furious reference. I'm sorry, I failed.

Sorry, been a while since Ive seen that movie.

[xantonin]

Originally Posted by Kage

Kinda suprised no ones done it yet, but anyone wanna start overlaying the mkIII? prefferable against the mki and mkii first, but also against the s2k, 370z, and the other cars that are comparable in size?

The MkIII is only 2 inches longer than the MkII so it really wouldn't have much point in doing that...

[Ryephile]

Originally Posted by xantonin

The MkIII is only 2 inches longer than the MkII so it really wouldn't have much point in doing that...

...and it's probably all from the massive rear diffuser jutting out!

[Zorro]

Originally Posted by Ryephile

+1. You don't buy this kind of car to haul around the neighborhood or your co-workers. The only thing the rear seats would be holding for me is a backpack. Actually, a "2+0" option would be fantastic. The Lotus Evora has a factory rear-seat delete option the knocks off a few dollars and installs a simple storage tray instead of seats and belts. I wonder if a "4 seater" is cheaper to insure, however.

I would love this. Lighten things up, and give us a huge trunk.