follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-20-2015, 05:03 AM   #351
dave-
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Australia
Posts: 100
Thanks: 47
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Was posted in another thread but more relevant here, does anyone know the RAM address for the second 02 sensor on an A01G rom?
dave- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 10:26 AM   #352
burdickjp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2013 ultramarine Scion FR-S
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 140
Thanked 137 Times in 70 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I noticed the 'load' value for B01C Roms is in g/s whereas the ECU tables are in g/rev. I've made a script to produce a new load value based on MAF and RPM, but am curious if the ECU has an address for load in g/rev.
burdickjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 02:33 PM   #353
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bur****jp View Post
I noticed the 'load' value for B01C Roms is in g/s whereas the ECU tables are in g/rev. I've made a script to produce a new load value based on MAF and RPM, but am curious if the ECU has an address for load in g/rev.
All load is g/rev. It's probably just a type error.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 04:32 PM   #354
ztan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave- View Post
Was posted in another thread but more relevant here, does anyone know the RAM address for the second 02 sensor on an A01G rom?
I've had a quick look at the OBD call table disassembly but have not tested:
Can you try FFF8D274 and FFF8D278 and report back?
ztan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ztan For This Useful Post:
dave- (02-22-2015), steve99 (02-23-2015)
Old 02-22-2015, 07:41 PM   #355
dave-
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Australia
Posts: 100
Thanks: 47
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ztan View Post
I've had a quick look at the OBD call table disassembly but have not tested:
Can you try FFF8D274 and FFF8D278 and report back?
Will try these later today and report back:

paramname = AFR2
paramid = 0xFFF8D274
isfloat = 1
scalingrpn = x,14.7,*

paramname = AFR3
paramid = 0xFFF8D278
isfloat = 1
scalingrpn = x,14.7,*
dave- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 08:13 PM   #356
ztan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave- View Post
Will try these later today and report back:

paramname = AFR2
paramid = 0xFFF8D274
isfloat = 1
scalingrpn = x,14.7,*

paramname = AFR3
paramid = 0xFFF8D278
isfloat = 1
scalingrpn = x,14.7,*
Off OBD Mode 01, PID 15, I'd expect D274 to be sensor volts reading between 0-1V (scaling rpn=x); 1V is rich, 0V is lean. Expect D278 to be AF3 trim (scalingrpn=x).
ztan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ztan For This Useful Post:
dave- (02-23-2015), steve99 (02-23-2015)
Old 02-22-2015, 09:35 PM   #357
burdickjp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2013 ultramarine Scion FR-S
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 140
Thanked 137 Times in 70 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
All load is g/rev. It's probably just a type error.
From the logs it looks to be similar in magnitude and value as the MAF logging, so I assumed the issue was related to that.
I'd much rather have a log of load than be calculating it. I guess doing the math with someone else's log could help me determine if my math is right.

Where would I start looking to fix this?
burdickjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2015, 03:15 AM   #358
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bur****jp View Post
From the logs it looks to be similar in magnitude and value as the MAF logging, so I assumed the issue was related to that.
I'd much rather have a log of load than be calculating it. I guess doing the math with someone else's log could help me determine if my math is right.

Where would I start looking to fix this?
So you haven't got a parameter for load? Calculating it isn't ideal due to the compensations that are made, there will be slight variances.

What file are you using for logging? Plenty of info on here to check the correct load parameter.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2015, 12:36 PM   #359
burdickjp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2013 ultramarine Scion FR-S
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 140
Thanked 137 Times in 70 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
So you haven't got a parameter for load? Calculating it isn't ideal due to the compensations that are made, there will be slight variances.

What file are you using for logging? Plenty of info on here to check the correct load parameter.
I got addresses from the 'b01c' addresses file. I can't remember which of the other files I started with, but there were a few things which needed to come over from the addresses file.
burdickjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2015, 05:51 PM   #360
dave-
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Australia
Posts: 100
Thanks: 47
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ztan View Post
Off OBD Mode 01, PID 15, I'd expect D274 to be sensor volts reading between 0-1V (scaling rpn=x); 1V is rich, 0V is lean. Expect D278 to be AF3 trim (scalingrpn=x).
Did some logs driving to work today using your values:

paramname = AFR2
paramid = 0xFFF8D274
isfloat = 1
scalingrpn = x

paramname = AFR3
paramid = 0xFFF8D278
isfloat = 1
scalingrpn = x


http://www.datazap.me/u/dave/rear-o2...g=0&data=29-30
dave- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2015, 06:58 PM   #361
burdickjp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2013 ultramarine Scion FR-S
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 140
Thanked 137 Times in 70 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Here's my current log config: http://pastebin.com/tNTbKqzK
burdickjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2015, 07:12 PM   #362
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bur****jp View Post
Here's my current log config: http://pastebin.com/tNTbKqzK
paramname = Load
paramid = 0xFFF8DB84
isfloat = 1

assuming that ram address is correct for your rom type your reading the "load" from the ECU it calculated by the ECU and not scaled by the tactrix ie no scaling is applied to value read from ECU.

The values you should range from almost 0 at idle to about 1.3 full throttle under load
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 10:37 PM   #363
burdickjp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2013 ultramarine Scion FR-S
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 140
Thanked 137 Times in 70 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
The values you should range from almost 0 at idle to about 1.3 full throttle under load
None of the configs from the OP scale load, so I'm guessing the address isn't right, or something similar.
burdickjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2015, 12:16 AM   #364
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bur****jp View Post
None of the configs from the OP scale load, so I'm guessing the address isn't right, or something similar.
try @phrosty he is on b01c or d rom sure he has a working logcfg.txt for that rom. strange load does not work as most guys would want that for maf scaling.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
ecuflash, tactrix, taxtrix, tuning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ECUFlash - Getting close! xjohnx Software Tuning 698 03-22-2015 12:10 PM
EcuTek Flash finished but now it shows only a Partial Flash... Cross Software Tuning 32 02-12-2014 10:55 AM
Tactrix Openport jamesm Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 1 01-28-2014 08:27 PM
Visconti Tuning - Latest BRZ Flash Info Visconti Software Tuning 6530 12-24-2013 10:18 PM
Overboost Protection With OFT/EcuFlash? FrX Software Tuning 9 10-23-2013 07:27 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.