follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-28-2012, 02:47 AM   #281
jonnyozero3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 4 wheels & some metal bits
Location: 000000N 0000000E
Posts: 210
Thanks: 222
Thanked 74 Times in 47 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
BRZ gets 1.6 DIT (shown right beside the first FA20 mockup, BTW), 240ish HP with a shit-ton more torque than it has now.

WRX STI gets a high flow variant of the FA20 DIT, say 350ish HP and 300+ lb-ft. Also will be lighter than current model.

Sibling rivalry solved.
I vote Subaru just gives the FA20 an extra two cylinders and a requisite bump in displacement. I bet a flat NA six would be magical. There's an inch or two of room to scoot the engine back to help with weight distribution, and the extra engine weight penalty should be minor when compared to the potential lbs-per-horsepower improvement. (Disclaimer: I'm no rocket botanist, and my assumption that the weight penalty would be "okay" is just a hopeful assumption).

Plus, keeping the BRZ NA would also keep the cross-shopping confusion down....as was said earlier, Midweight/AWD/Turbo/4-door vs Lightweight/RWD/NA/2+2 Coupe. Perfect complimentary and diverse solution to stacking the model lineup in a marketable fashion. It also lets Subaru be different from Toyota/Scion, who might be going the supercharger FI route (if you put any credence to the previous rumors and hints from Toyota).

Such a BRZ would put the base Cayman (and maybe the S, depending on power) squarely in STI's cross-hairs. For ~half the price.

....one can dream

Last edited by jonnyozero3; 10-28-2012 at 02:04 PM. Reason: Disclaimer
jonnyozero3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 03:03 AM   #282
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyozero3 View Post
I vote Subaru just gives the FA20 an extra two cylinders and a requisite bump in displacement. A flat NA six would be magical in this chassis. There's an inch or two of room to scoot the engine back to help with weight distribution, and the extra engine weight penalty should be minor when compared to the potential lbs-per-horsepower improvement.

Plus, keeping the BRZ NA would also keep the cross-shopping confusion down....as was said earlier, Midweight/AWD/Turbo/4-door vs Lightweight/RWD/NA/2+2 Coupe. Perfect complimentary and diverse solution to stacking the model lineup in a marketable fashion. It also lets Subaru be different from Toyota/Scion, who might be going the supercharger FI route (if you put any credence to the previous rumors and hints from Toyota).

Such a BRZ would put the base Cayman (and maybe the S, depending on power) squarely in STI's cross-hairs. For ~half the price.

....one can dream
My point was they showed an FA16DIT right beside the FA20 when they revealed it. Right beside it. Yet there is NO mention of it when turbo rumours pop up.



The one in the background. 1.6L DI with a Legacy-style turbo mounting setup.

Plus my guess as for the power output of the WRX STI are because it will likely have more power than the turbo Legacy, that is already confirmed with a 300 hp FA20DIT.

This would be the obvious solution to turbo toe-stepping between the BRZ and WRX.
__________________


Because titanium.

Last edited by Dimman; 10-28-2012 at 03:13 AM. Reason: pic
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 03:45 AM   #283
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
We could also play a hypothetical math game.

What if the numbers are right but the displacement is wrong. (Because why would the sports car get shittier numbers than the Legacy? Tiny turbo that chokes the motor even more than the Legacy's curve?)

Now if we take it to be 280 HP and 250 lb-ft from a 1.6L DIT, that sounds more exciting. This gives us 175HP/L and ~156 lb-ft/L. Now apply those numbers to a 2.0L motor of higher performance than the existing Legacy one for the WRX STI, 350HP and ~315 lb-ft.

Thoughts?
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 02:10 PM   #284
jonnyozero3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 4 wheels & some metal bits
Location: 000000N 0000000E
Posts: 210
Thanks: 222
Thanked 74 Times in 47 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Personally, I still vote "no" on that idea until it's shown that it won't wreck the current (excellent) throttle response.

I still think if Subaru turbo'd it, it will be incongruous with their previous marketing spiel/purpose of the car. I file it under "tough sell" considering their current posture with the model.
jonnyozero3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 02:46 PM   #285
Draco-REX
Corner Junkie
 
Draco-REX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 11 STI, 99 RS
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 129
Thanked 1,521 Times in 702 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
No one ever learns... You'd think all the speculation before the release of this car would have taught people about "inside sources". Let's see, according to "inside sources" the BRZ Limited was going to be 35K, there was going to be a 300hp turbo model at launch, the car was going to be delayed until 2013, there would only be 600 BRZs total, etc.

Nothing is confirmed unless Subaru announces it, or it's sitting on a plinth at the Tokyo Auto Show as a production model (same thing).
Draco-REX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 06:49 PM   #286
jonnyozero3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 4 wheels & some metal bits
Location: 000000N 0000000E
Posts: 210
Thanks: 222
Thanked 74 Times in 47 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draco-REX View Post

Nothing is confirmed unless Subaru announces it, or it's sitting on a plinth at the Tokyo Auto Show as a production model (same thing).
Exactly.

Sans any reasonable named source, the most likely answer is "more power" but "no turbo", as that's the only data anyone has provided with a reputable, connected, named source:

Quote:
"Plus, we want to keep turbocharging separate. It is for models like the WRX STI," said Atake Atoshi (Subaru’s head of global marketing)

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/subaru/...rz-sti-planned
Everything else is idle speculation.

Last edited by jonnyozero3; 10-28-2012 at 07:23 PM.
jonnyozero3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 07:14 PM   #287
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^Ah yes, even the head marketing guy said no turbo. When he says this and all the other execs in Toyota/Subaru say this who would you believe: the official announcements or the media with unofficial/unnamed sources?

If the media keeps spouting this rumor it's easy for people to want to believe it is true. But think about the media's motivation... they need readership/subscribers/internet traffic. They will use this tactic and use buzzwords like "credible" or "insider" sources and say "rumor" as a disclaimer so they don't lose credibility. The head admin of this ft86club (Hachiroku) did exactly that and look at the number of pages deep we are in this thread: 14. That's heavy traffic generated on no real news.
__________________

Last edited by switchlanez; 10-28-2012 at 07:25 PM.
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 07:24 PM   #288
Beyer Subaru
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ SWP 6AT Ltd
Location: Alexandria, VA.
Posts: 1,607
Thanks: 859
Thanked 776 Times in 485 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
This just in from a source. "Switchlanez is wrong. STi is now considering a twin turbo flat six engine for the STi variant BRZ that will be released in December (Just in time for ChrismaHannuQwanzaaka!) of 2012 as a 2015 model. It will be capable of warp speed at low altitudes and emit butterflies from it's exhaust."

Hey, it did come from a source. Right?
Beyer Subaru is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Beyer Subaru For This Useful Post:
ashtray (10-29-2012), OrbitalEllipses (10-29-2012), switchlanez (10-28-2012)
Old 10-28-2012, 07:25 PM   #289
jonnyozero3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 4 wheels & some metal bits
Location: 000000N 0000000E
Posts: 210
Thanks: 222
Thanked 74 Times in 47 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I wonder if there will be a "butterfly delete" option for preorders?
jonnyozero3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 12:51 AM   #290
Crossover Auto
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FR-S, BR-Z, 86
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 231
Thanks: 37
Thanked 53 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Shadow View Post
There are plenty of GDI cars that are also turbocharged. Why would you want or need port injection (or port along with direct injection) on a forced induction application? If anything, I think GDI is better suited for forced induction in the first place.
It's fine for mild modded applications. But for all out extreme HP builds, direct injection has a bottle neck and it has to due with the cam driven high pressure fuel pump and lack of higher flowing injectors. That is why the current hybrid setup is more desirable for tuners and modders looking to extract high hp #s.
Crossover Auto is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Crossover Auto For This Useful Post:
Allch Chcar (10-29-2012)
Old 10-29-2012, 02:23 PM   #291
einzlr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: several
Location: norcal
Posts: 903
Thanks: 421
Thanked 286 Times in 223 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Autoweek is reporting that Subaru is saying they're developing a turbo BRZ. Oct. 29 print edition and here:

http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...news/121029941
__________________
Asphalt FR-S MT (future)
'05 Hyundai Accent; '01 BMW M Coupe; '01 BMW M Roadster (for sale); '99 BMW Z3 Coupe 2.8l (for sale)

"Simplicate and add lightness." - Gordon Hooton
einzlr is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to einzlr For This Useful Post:
Dorb (10-29-2012)
Old 10-29-2012, 02:36 PM   #292
Admiral Ballsy
Shorter of breath
 
Admiral Ballsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: a soft bargain
Location: Central IN
Posts: 414
Thanks: 1
Thanked 118 Times in 77 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by einzlr View Post
Autoweek is reporting that Subaru is saying they're developing a turbo BRZ.
Yeah, but parse what he says carefully. What Subaru said is, they're developing a turbocharged FA20. Well, no kidding, it's been reported everywhere. It'll be the next WRX engine, for one thing.

Then he says "look for it in the 2014 BRZ"....but he doesn't actually quote Subaru as saying that.

The turbo FA20 as shown in various pictures wouldn't work in the BRZ - turbo packaging is all wrong.
Admiral Ballsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 02:47 PM   #293
SkullWorks
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SSM LT MT BRZ
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,033
Thanks: 803
Thanked 754 Times in 328 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Autoweek even stated that there was no confirmation from Subaru (because they all need a disclaimer) everyone has to report the rumor now, otherwise they look like they aren't paying attention,

As per usual, the uninformed and ignorant are louder than reasonable researched and knowledgeable....
SkullWorks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SkullWorks For This Useful Post:
jonnyozero3 (10-29-2012)
Old 10-29-2012, 02:58 PM   #294
einzlr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: several
Location: norcal
Posts: 903
Thanks: 421
Thanked 286 Times in 223 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkullWorks View Post
Autoweek even stated that there was no confirmation from Subaru (because they all need a disclaimer) everyone has to report the rumor now, otherwise they look like they aren't paying attention,

As per usual, the uninformed and ignorant are louder than reasonable researched and knowledgeable....
Thought folks might be interested. So shoot me
__________________
Asphalt FR-S MT (future)
'05 Hyundai Accent; '01 BMW M Coupe; '01 BMW M Roadster (for sale); '99 BMW Z3 Coupe 2.8l (for sale)

"Simplicate and add lightness." - Gordon Hooton
einzlr is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fr-s with subaru turbo? Afdad120108 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 46 05-19-2012 06:10 AM
Rumor: Next Gen WRX to use electric turbo. Dark Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 32 02-29-2012 02:58 PM
Rumor: Subaru BRZ Price from $24,000 for Premium and $27,000 for Limited (rumor) Quantum BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 323 12-20-2011 07:12 AM
Rumor via MT's Ed Loh: Subaru to turbocharged FA20 Engine Mess11 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 69 12-08-2011 01:24 AM
New rumor: Subaru FT-86 Version Could Have 60hp More Than Toyota FT-86 Hachiroku BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 37 08-20-2010 10:10 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.