follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-06-2012, 11:23 AM   #15
carbonBLUE
Reverse Burnouts
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 Argento FRS
Location: dallas!!!
Posts: 2,894
Thanks: 707
Thanked 1,257 Times in 592 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
He said
"Center of engine block below engine throttle."
ok ty
__________________

2000 Carbon Blue Toyota Celica GTS 152000 miles
(wont forget you)
2013 Argento Scion FR-S
2011 Infiniti G37x
carbonBLUE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 01:11 PM   #16
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
ok, how much variation are we talking about here?

I've machined parts to plus or minus 0.001 inch on a 40 year old lathe using a high speed steel bit I hand ground on a bench grinder. Surely Subaru's engine manufacturing plant can do good enough to keep things well within tolerance so this isn't required.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 01:53 PM   #17
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
ok, how much variation are we talking about here?

I've machined parts to plus or minus 0.001 inch on a 40 year old lathe using a high speed steel bit I hand ground on a bench grinder. Surely Subaru's engine manufacturing plant can do good enough to keep things well within tolerance so this isn't required.
So have I.

But I've also honed connecting rods. Tolerance on rods is in tenths. Tightest I worked on is +.0003/-.0002. Some Mitsubishi rods are +/- .0001
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 02:10 PM   #18
Jeff Lange
Senior Member
 
Jeff Lange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 1986 AE86 GT-S, 2011 Lexus IS250 6M
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 661
Thanks: 136
Thanked 361 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It varies depending on the engine and tolerances, etc. Here's a somewhat typical crankshaft journal marking to diameter reference chart from a Toyota engine:

Mark 0 - 54.999 to 55.000 mm (2.1653 to 2.1654 in.)
Mark 1 - 54.997 to 54.998 mm (2.1652 to 2.1653 in.)
Mark 2 - 54.995 to 54.996 mm (2.1652 to 2.1652 in.)
Mark 3 - 54.993 to 54.994 mm (2.1651 to 2.1651 in.)
Mark 4 - 54.991 to 54.992 mm (2.1650 to 2.1650 in.)
Mark 5 - 54.988 to 54.990 mm (2.1649 to 2.1650 in.)

The important thing to remember is that these are high production engines, not something that is precision made by hand, etc. Bits wear, etc., this allows the engines to be made with a slightly wider tolerance range for machining, but with precise measurement, the oil clearances are always extremely tight and within a much tighter spec. Engines can be made in volume and at high capacity with exacting clearances without the need to check and recheck and replace tooling as frequently.

Also from what I've seen in most production engines on tear down, they're almost always within the middle of the range. Seeing something like a mark 0 or 5 on an engine is usually very unlikely. On some engines (like the 2JZ), they only have 1 piston size, and the block is more precise for machining, while older engines just had larger tolerances, etc.

Jeff
__________________

2011 Lexus IS350 F-Sport 6MT with LSD
1986 Toyota Corolla GT-S Supercharged

Last edited by Jeff Lange; 05-06-2012 at 02:21 PM.
Jeff Lange is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeff Lange For This Useful Post:
Calum (05-06-2012)
Old 05-06-2012, 02:29 PM   #19
Subie
Seņor Member
 
Subie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2013 SSM DZE BRZ
Location: SC
Posts: 947
Thanks: 728
Thanked 405 Times in 196 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lange View Post
It varies depending on the engine and tolerances, etc. Here's a somewhat typical crankshaft journal marking to diameter reference chart from a Toyota engine:

Mark 0 - 54.999 to 55.000 mm (2.1653 to 2.1654 in.)
Mark 1 - 54.997 to 54.998 mm (2.1652 to 2.1653 in.)
Mark 2 - 54.995 to 54.996 mm (2.1652 to 2.1652 in.)
Mark 3 - 54.993 to 54.994 mm (2.1651 to 2.1651 in.)
Mark 4 - 54.991 to 54.992 mm (2.1650 to 2.1650 in.)
Mark 5 - 54.988 to 54.990 mm (2.1649 to 2.1650 in.)

The important thing to remember is that these are high production engines, not something that is precision made by hand, etc. Bits wear, etc., this allows the engines to be made with a slightly wider tolerance range for machining, but with precise measurement, the oil clearances are always extremely tight and within a much tighter spec. Engines can be made in volume and at high capacity with exacting clearances without the need to check and recheck and replace tooling as frequently.

Also from what I've seen in most production engines on tear down, they're almost always within the middle of the range. Seeing something like a mark 0 or 5 on an engine is usually very unlikely. On some engines (like the 2JZ), they only have 1 piston size, and the block is more precise for machining, while older engines just had larger tolerances, etc.

Jeff
Is this the reason why a lot of modern engines suffer from piston slap?
Subie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 02:34 PM   #20
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subie View Post
Is this the reason why a lot of modern engines suffer from piston slap?
That has more to do with the length of the piston skirt, the rod/stroke ratio and in some cases the wrist pin offset.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 02:39 PM   #21
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lange View Post
It varies depending on the engine and tolerances, etc. Here's a somewhat typical crankshaft journal marking to diameter reference chart from a Toyota engine:

Mark 0 - 54.999 to 55.000 mm (2.1653 to 2.1654 in.)
Mark 1 - 54.997 to 54.998 mm (2.1652 to 2.1653 in.)
Mark 2 - 54.995 to 54.996 mm (2.1652 to 2.1652 in.)
Mark 3 - 54.993 to 54.994 mm (2.1651 to 2.1651 in.)
Mark 4 - 54.991 to 54.992 mm (2.1650 to 2.1650 in.)
Mark 5 - 54.988 to 54.990 mm (2.1649 to 2.1650 in.)

The important thing to remember is that these are high production engines, not something that is precision made by hand, etc. Bits wear, etc., this allows the engines to be made with a slightly wider tolerance range for machining, but with precise measurement, the oil clearances are always extremely tight and within a much tighter spec. Engines can be made in volume and at high capacity with exacting clearances without the need to check and recheck and replace tooling as frequently.

Also from what I've seen in most production engines on tear down, they're almost always within the middle of the range. Seeing something like a mark 0 or 5 on an engine is usually very unlikely. On some engines (like the 2JZ), they only have 1 piston size, and the block is more precise for machining, while older engines just had larger tolerances, etc.

Jeff
I was having images of huge differences, but 5 thou total range that most likely doesn't get used, but could be compensated for seems very reasonable.

Thanks for the detailed post.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 03:10 PM   #22
xwd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 860 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The A and B on the Subaru engines does indeed identify the cylinder bore size and also the stock piston diameter size. Traditionally the B pistons are smaller than the A pistons. In some of the older engines the difference in size is around .007" total where the top .004 are the As and the bottom .003 are the Bs.

The BRZ factory repair manual will have exact specs on what they mean.
xwd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 04:37 PM   #23
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
I was having images of huge differences, but 5 thou total range that most likely doesn't get used, but could be compensated for seems very reasonable.

Thanks for the detailed post.
That's 5 tenth's btw. Half a thou.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 05:33 PM   #24
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
That's 5 tenth's btw. Half a thou.
yeah, Doh.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Open Deck Block nrclptcnsmniak Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 36 01-27-2012 01:00 PM
STI engine Aldo the Apache Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 49 11-03-2011 09:36 PM
Ken Block Gymkhana 3 Midship Runabout Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 24 09-14-2010 11:55 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.