follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-18-2013, 12:52 PM   #15
Tansey86
Senior Member
 
Tansey86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2003 Subaru Outback
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,318
Thanks: 154
Thanked 529 Times in 300 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsguy83 View Post
If he's not actively tracking the car there's no need to run -2.3 camber on the back. While it is not a huge difference, there is a difference between -1 to -2.3 camber so getting an LCA kit is a good investment over the life of the car to help tires last more.

Having said that, if he plans on running -2 or -3 in the front, what's the point of going for -1 on the back? Why is tire wear not a concern in the front? If the -2, -3 on the front is for track purposes, then I completely agree with you @ZDan he should keep the -2.35
So with the SPC lca you can bring the rear camber(naturally say from sportlines) from -2.5 to -1 id youd like?
__________________
" I know a lot about cars, man. I can look at any car's headlights and tell you exactly which way it's coming. "
Tansey86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 12:55 PM   #16
Sportsguy83
I Love custom Turbo kits
 
Sportsguy83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,346 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tansey86 View Post
So with the SPC lca you can bring the rear camber(naturally say from sportlines) from -2.5 to -1 id youd like?
Well, there's a Caveat with the LCA's. They move Toe at the same time as Camber. So in my case, I was at -2.4 and was able to dial it in to -1.3. It could not be dialed in down more because the Toe had no more room for adjustment. So in theory yes, you can go from -2.5 to -1, but you will also need adjustable Toe. NOW, specifically talking about the SPC LCA's, they do include a Toe Bushing to allow bigger Toe adjustments. With the Toe bushing, you will be able to make it.
Sportsguy83 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sportsguy83 For This Useful Post:
Keenercarguy (04-25-2016), Tansey86 (08-18-2013)
Old 08-18-2013, 12:57 PM   #17
Tansey86
Senior Member
 
Tansey86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2003 Subaru Outback
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,318
Thanks: 154
Thanked 529 Times in 300 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsguy83 View Post
Well, there's a Caveat with the LCA's. They move Toe at the same time as Camber. So in my case, I was at -2.4 and was able to dial it in to -1.3. It could not be dialed in down more because the Toe had no more room for adjustment. So in theory yes, you can go from -2.5 to -1, but you will also need adjustable Toe. NOW, specifically talking about the SPC LCA's, they do include a Toe Bushing to allow bigger Toe adjustments. With the Toe bushing, you will be able to make it.
Sportsguy dropping knowledge on the reg. Thanks man.
__________________
" I know a lot about cars, man. I can look at any car's headlights and tell you exactly which way it's coming. "
Tansey86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tansey86 For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (08-18-2013)
Old 08-18-2013, 01:16 PM   #18
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 4,006 Times in 2,095 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsguy83 View Post
If he's not actively tracking the car there's no need to run -2.3 camber on the back. While it is not a huge difference, there is a difference between -1 to -2.3 camber so getting an LCA kit is a good investment over the life of the car to help tires last more.
I don't think it is a good investment, because it's ~$500 NOW, whereas the cost of running -2.35 degrees camber in back is only going to amount to ~10% reduced tire life, which is only going to effectively cost ~$25 or so every 20k miles (assuming shorter-life max perf tires) on average. Depending on usage and tires, I'd *much* rather spend ~$25/yr on average on the increased tire wear starting a year from now *and* enjoy greater ultimate lateral grip, than to spend $500 *right now* and reduce ultimate lateral grip.

Even if that $500 is just kept in a jar instead of being spent on unneeded parts/labor, it would take 20 years to recoup the investment! Much better to not spend the $500, even from a purely financial perspective.

FWIW, I'm running -2 in back on the S2000 and my RS-3 rears are at nearly 20k and still 1/32 left to the wear bars. I just looked at them, and the wear is actually EVEN across the four circumferential grooves. The only discernable "camber wear" is a bevel across the inner half of the innermost tread blocks.

Quote:
Having said that, if he plans on running -2 or -3 in the front, what's the point of going for -1 on the back? Why is tire wear not a concern in the front?
Zackly. It doesn't make sense.

This thread is starting to remind me of threads I see on S2ki where people want to slam their cars and run uber-hella-flush setups, but don't want to have to run any camber!

OEM camber settings are WAY conservative. You can run a LOT more without any big negatives and with the big positive of increased ultimate dry grip.

-2.35 is not too much for the street, IMO.
Toe is way way WAY more of a factor in tire life.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (08-18-2013)
Old 08-18-2013, 01:24 PM   #19
Sportsguy83
I Love custom Turbo kits
 
Sportsguy83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,346 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
Garage
^ Agreed, I just thought the SPC's at $200 (new revision, the old one did not look beefy and up to the task) are a good option, but you do make great points.

Sportsguy83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 01:56 PM   #20
Ny Brz
Hella Flush
 
Ny Brz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ
Location: Yonkers, NY
Posts: 1,090
Thanks: 170
Thanked 332 Times in 251 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I have ST coils as well and just swapped the front crash\camber bolts in the front, to get get rid of the current rub i was getting in the front. Once the car was aligned the car handles great for my purpose of DD.
__________________
Ny Brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 02:09 PM   #21
mike the snake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I may do an AX or 2, and I may also do a track day as well.

I went with staggered, 245 front and 265 rear, so I figured if I went with less rear camber and more front camber, it might help with the extra understeer that my wheel/tire choices will cause.

I still have the stock wheels and tires, and I've tossed around the idea of getting some sticky tires for those wheels and use them for AX or track days.

I'm not too worried about tire wear, just trying to set my car up to be balanced if i can.

Thanks for the replies, I may just leave it all alone. Asking questions and getting answers helps me decide what I want to do.
mike the snake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2013, 07:36 AM   #22
evil_1998
Senior Member
 
evil_1998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: GT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 110
Thanks: 31
Thanked 56 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tansey86 View Post
What was your natural camber in the front and rear after dropping the car on sportlines? I'm interested in those springs but I want to make sure I can get rid of all the camber once I install them and get back to the oem alignment.
Fronts was close to 0 camber.

I had -1.29 (L) & -2.29 (R) before the bushes.
__________________

PROJECTGT86
evil_1998 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 01:24 AM   #23
SubaSteve
Captain Cocoa
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: CBS BRZ MT
Location: MD
Posts: 597
Thanks: 32
Thanked 282 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsguy83 View Post
I initially bought the Whiteline bushing kit. After dropping my car on Tarmac 0 coilovers, I had -1.8 and -2.4 on the back. The whiteline bushing kit only adjusted .75 degrees.

I went ahead and sold the Bushing kit before installing it and bought a set of new version SPC LCA's for ~$200. Easy to install, very easy to adjust and now have -1.3 camber on both sides. Go with that, no need for the $400+ LCA's.
My brother and I did the install on the kit and let me tell you it was a pita.
SubaSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SubaSteve For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (05-26-2014)
Old 05-26-2014, 02:50 AM   #24
ZionsWrath
Thanks
 
ZionsWrath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: NY
Posts: 4,163
Thanks: 5,989
Thanked 3,100 Times in 1,498 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Do they make a complete kit? When i bought a kit for my honda (ingalls) it came with adjustable toe and camber arms.
__________________
ZionsWrath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2015, 06:20 AM   #25
keonigt
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: 2022 BRZ
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 86
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Just to clarify, lower control arms are used to increase and decrease camber?
keonigt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2015, 09:34 AM   #26
cjd
Senior Member
 
cjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,291
Thanks: 1,260
Thanked 2,933 Times in 1,716 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by keonigt View Post
Just to clarify, lower control arms are used to increase and decrease camber?
Correct.
cjd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cjd For This Useful Post:
keonigt (07-01-2015)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
~~CUSCO Rear Lower Control Arms!!~~ nemesisdrift Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 2 05-20-2013 03:35 PM
DIY Request: Rear Lower Control Arms Ryaquinn DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Guides 2 05-08-2013 07:25 PM
SPC Rear Adjustable Lower Control Arms Bcarlos Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 11 04-19-2013 11:56 PM
SPC rear lower control arms, Fix your camber! JoeBoxer Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 12 03-31-2013 08:02 PM
cusco rear lower control arms for FR-S BRZ driver01 Canada Classifieds 3 02-01-2013 06:28 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.