follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2011, 07:12 PM   #15
madfast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2010 Evo X MR-T
Location: NY
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikaros View Post
Which review said it has a snow mode? I think I read somewhere that it's great in the snow but I don't remember reading about specific snow mode. If it does have one that might be useful cause of the snow we get up here.
there is a Sport and Snow button aft of the AT shifter, but it's missing on the MT shifter.
madfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 07:20 PM   #16
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CXTKRS1 View Post
I disagree, a high end multi clutch setup like the PDK transmission is superior to the traditional manual transmission in every way. Plus the transmission can be used to replace the slush boxes in other Toyota models which would mean better fuel economy for the entire brand.
Except for driver enjoyment. I've driven many dual clutch setups and none of them provided the enjoyment of actually having to change gears like a manual.

There's no doubt that the manual is a slower solution, but I couldn't care less about numbers.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 07:21 PM   #17
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by madfast View Post
there is a Sport and Snow button aft of the AT shifter, but it's missing on the MT shifter.
Drivers with a MT don't need the transmission to let us drive in the snow.

Sorry, I had to
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 07:47 PM   #18
ryude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Drives: Volkswagen GTI
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 466
Thanks: 6
Thanked 32 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Except for driver enjoyment. I've driven many dual clutch setups and none of them provided the enjoyment of actually having to change gears like a manual.

There's no doubt that the manual is a slower solution, but I couldn't care less about numbers.
We could argue all day about the benefits vs disadvantages of both transmission. At the end of the day, it's all preference.
ryude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 12:39 AM   #19
CXTKRS1
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2009 Scion xD
Location: United States
Posts: 87
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Drivers with a MT don't need the transmission to let us drive in the snow.

Sorry, I had to
No but the TC and VSC will definitely talk to you if you start to shift a little to hard.
CXTKRS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 12:42 AM   #20
CXTKRS1
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2009 Scion xD
Location: United States
Posts: 87
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Except for driver enjoyment. I've driven many dual clutch setups and none of them provided the enjoyment of actually having to change gears like a manual.

There's no doubt that the manual is a slower solution, but I couldn't care less about numbers.
So because you prefer an old school manual Toyota should just say fuck it and use ancient technology for an automatic? A dual clutch system should be used in every Toyota car that is an automatic. Like I said it is a sad day when Hyundai is outpacing both Honda and Toyota.
CXTKRS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 01:20 AM   #21
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Just because it's newer doesn't mean it's better. Hydraulic coupling has a few advantages; higher efficiency when input/output speed is not the same, aka less energy lost to starts, and theoretically less servicing required because there is nothing that is supposed to wear out.

A single clutch gearbox, torque converter or not, can shift much faster than a manual transmission. I think most people consider that adequate for a typical car, and hence there is no reason to use a more complex and expensive dual clutch system, especially considering that clutch plates inevitably wear out.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 03:16 AM   #22
Snaps
Supra Owner
 
Snaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: 1995 Toyota Supra UK Spec
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^ Bingo. Some of you people really need to learn a bit more in-depth on stuff before making statements.

With Torque Convertor Lockup like it's controlled in most cars today, there is just as little drivetrain efficiency loss as a manual. If you're comparing the auto in the FT to one in say, a 90's or early 2000's car, then you're comparing it to the wrong transmission. As other's have mentioned, the IS-F's auto tranny can shift in 0.1 seconds, much faster than all manuals (bar the sequential ones used in racing). Also, after first gear the TC is locked up right up until 8th (on the IS-F), meaning you get just as much throttle response and efficiency as a manual. I'd be more worried about the accelerator lag from Drive-By-Wire than I would be about the responsiveness of a modern TC'ed auto.

DCT's are reasonably new technology for a production car, and not something I think Toyota should be trying in what's supposed to be an "affordable", reliable, fun car.
__________________
Snaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 10:29 AM   #23
LeeT
Member
 
LeeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2011 Mustang GT
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Does the IS-F auto handle added power and track use well? I would be a little worried about heat...
LeeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 10:31 AM   #24
Ikaros
Solar wind surfer
 
Ikaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 500
Thanks: 14
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Yeah, from that FR-S unveiling yesterday, I highly doubt the auto transmission is going to be from the IS-F now. I guess I'm just gonna have to buy it as an manual and hope it doesn't blow up in the process of me learning how to drive it.
Ikaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 10:52 AM   #25
Buggy51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Put Put
Location: CA
Posts: 607
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikaros View Post
Yeah, from that FR-S unveiling yesterday, I highly doubt the auto transmission is going to be from the IS-F now. I guess I'm just gonna have to buy it as an manual and hope it doesn't blow up in the process of me learning how to drive it.
You had x-ray vision? o_O
Buggy51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 12:11 PM   #26
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CXTKRS1 View Post
So because you prefer an old school manual Toyota should just say fuck it and use ancient technology for an automatic? A dual clutch system should be used in every Toyota car that is an automatic. Like I said it is a sad day when Hyundai is outpacing both Honda and Toyota.
For a sports car I absolutely do, but then I've never been about the numbers sooo.. :shrug:

And Dual clutch systems are becoming less important with the newer autos. For autos, they are good. Both completely lack the feel of the manual IMO so both will be avoided by me at all costs.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 12:13 PM   #27
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikaros View Post
Yeah, from that FR-S unveiling yesterday, I highly doubt the auto transmission is going to be from the IS-F now. I guess I'm just gonna have to buy it as an manual and hope it doesn't blow up in the process of me learning how to drive it.
They keep using words like "based on" but they don't define it beyond that. It's not going to be an IS-F trans limited to 6 gears only I'm sure. I'd bet it's a different trans all together just with similar computer tuning.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 04:47 PM   #28
madfast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2010 Evo X MR-T
Location: NY
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
They keep using words like "based on" but they don't define it beyond that. It's not going to be an IS-F trans limited to 6 gears only I'm sure. I'd bet it's a different trans all together just with similar computer tuning.
why not? the IS-F tranny isnt some magical AT. at its core, the ISF 8 speed just uses better solenoids to control the hydraulic pressure to allow lighting quick shifts. combined with the aforementioned TC lockup strategy, you get an incredibly quick shifting and responsive AT. the old school musclecar guys have been building AT's for decades. this is nothing really all that new, except for the fact that lexus had the balls to do it on a production car.
madfast is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do you think FT-86 will have automatic? TRD Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 217 08-03-2013 10:36 AM
FT-86, manual or automatic transmission??? luisjr Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 22 07-25-2012 04:00 AM
Anyone Else Considering an Automatic FR-S? iff2mastamatt Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 410 02-16-2012 01:41 PM
BRZ manual or automatic? f1ver BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 23 08-30-2011 10:07 PM
FT-86 offered AUTOMATIC only? KiingDavid Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 34 02-02-2011 03:39 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.