My Nameless header dyno results (results to follow)

[weederr33]

Originally Posted by Simply_the_best

You are running the Nameless long tube header? Also Which charger are you running? Vortech? I am planning on going supercharged but know that only certain ones will work with this header. John from Nameless said that he was speaking with someone that had a vortech with this header but had to rotate the housing a little.

Yep, I'm running their long tube header. I have the Cosworth supercharger kit.

[Simply_the_best]

Originally Posted by weederr33

Yep, I'm running their long tube header. I have the Cosworth supercharger kit.

That's good to know! Thanks!

[Reamer]

Originally Posted by Simply_the_best

Yes it is very very heat resistant. There are tests that prove this stuff works flawlessly. Hope this helps.

DAMN!

I'm hoping to have a build similar to yours not too far from now except I'm running the ACE Type-B 350 header and I'm curious of the performance differences between Nameless and ACE since they take different approaches to the same end goal (long tube EL headers).

EDIT: I posted this before actually looking at your build thread. I have maybe 1/20th the mods you do. Haha. Most are where it counts, just ain't as pretty as yours...yet.

[Simply_the_best]

**UPDATED up top**

[Summerwolf]

What are the total mods? I know you stated all the NA "supporting mods" but then you don't even hit 200 HP.

[Infinity]

Originally Posted by Simply_the_best

This is the dyno results 198whp & 162wtq. The Dyno reads on the low side so for a fact I know im over 200 whp. Im thinking somewhere around 210whp. The car pulls harder than before.

Is that on E85?

[Simply_the_best]

Originally Posted by Summerwolf

What are the total mods? I know you stated all the NA "supporting mods" but then you don't even hit 200 HP.

*Updated thread with mods in the top. As I stated above this dyno reads on the low side. A previous car was tuned on the same dyno as me put down 195whp and went to another shop and that same car made 207whp with no tune change. As well as when I was tuned it was 91 degrees ambient temps.

[Simply_the_best]

Originally Posted by Infinity

Is that on E85?

Yes read previous post.

[Summerwolf]

Dyno's vary, but you are proven to be 198 on E85.

[nisti]

Can you feel that tiny torque dip now?

[Simply_the_best]

Originally Posted by nisti

Can you feel that tiny torque dip now?

No, it's roughly @ 2.5k-3k. Virtually unnoticeable.

[NyC Zn6]

Originally Posted by Summerwolf

What are the total mods? I know you stated all the NA "supporting mods" but then you don't even hit 200 HP.

these cars are horrible at making power n/a ...smh

[churchx]

Given strict emission standards these days imho these engines make loads of power even completely stock. Yes, honda's 4 bangers or rotaries of mazda would be able to get more .. but not revolutionary more. Imho NA FA20 is undeservedly overshadowed by turbo engines of subaru but in reality is damn fine engine on it's own even with it's quirks like torque dip and seemingly lack of power. We simply maybe are too spoiled with loads of torque of more and more common turbo engines these days.

[Simply_the_best]

Originally Posted by churchx

Given strict emission standards these days imho these engines make loads of power even completely stock. Yes, honda's 4 bangers or rotaries of mazda would be able to get more .. but not revolutionary more. Imho NA FA20 is undeservedly overshadowed by turbo engines of subaru but in reality is damn fine engine on it's own even with it's quirks like torque dip and seemingly lack of power. We simply maybe are too spoiled with loads of torque of more and more common turbo engines these days.

Correct and what most people don't understand that is RWD cars have more drivetrain power loss vs. FWD. Thats why it seems as if Honda K20's (which are 86mm x 86mm as well as twins) make more power over the twins.