Random Thoughts - Part Deux [NO POLITICS]

[ichitaka05]

Originally Posted by 86Boyz

Well, why didn't you say that in the first place. Everyone presumed you were getting on him about using the N word.

Seems somewhat extreme to ban someone over that. This forum should be renamed to FT-1984

Extreme? Well, you can blame the members did crazy idiotic stuff to make admin make that rule.

How extreme? Some members posts in EVERY DAMN thread to free banned member. They made new threads in every section of forum. They PM mods and admin every min... Best part is they don't even know the whole story.

So again, sounds extreme for having that rule? Blame the extreme members who thought they can do whatever they want and pissed off the admin.

[cjd]

Originally Posted by ichitaka05

I wasn't talking about that. I was talking about actually talking about banned member (minimum of 1 wk ban) AND to unban that banned member (perma banned)

Made myself clear on that point?

I do believe you're the one that brought the subject up... Or are ambiguous references OK, just not by name?

Or were you baiting the masses?

Not that it matters, but the rule makes sense to me. I've also done years as a mod on a car forum so know how it goes.

C

[Ultramaroon]

Free Willy.

[FX86]

Originally Posted by cjd

I do believe you're the one that brought the subject up... Or are ambiguous references OK, just not by name?

Or were you baiting the masses?

Not that it matters, but the rule makes sense to me. I've also done years as a mod on a car forum so know how it goes.

C

you're right this dude was the one that brought it up first...otherwise no one would have noticed..but the mods need to get off somehow i guess

[86Boyz]

Originally Posted by ichitaka05

Extreme? Well, you can blame the members did crazy idiotic stuff to make admin make that rule.

How extreme? Some members posts in EVERY DAMN thread to free banned member. They made new threads in every section of forum. They PM mods and admin every min... Best part is they don't even know the whole story.

So again, sounds extreme for having that rule? Blame the extreme members who thought they can do whatever they want and pissed off the admin.

Can we have their names so we can know who ruined it for all of us?

[Ashikabi]

Cole got banned again?

[FX86]

Originally Posted by Ashikabi

Cole got banned again?

aww shit he mentioned his name

[Tectoniic]

Originally Posted by cjd

I do believe you're the one that brought the subject up... Or are ambiguous references OK, just not by name?

Or were you baiting the masses?

Not that it matters, but the rule makes sense to me. I've also done years as a mod on a car forum so know how it goes.

C

To be fair, I don't think ichi was trying to bait anyone. I think he just wanted to let alot of the people in this thread, who talk with the banned member quite a bit, know that it was not ichi who banned him so they wouldn't harass him about unbanning said member

But we all know how the internet works:

ron burgandy escalating quick meme.jpg

[FX86]

Originally Posted by Tectoniic

To be fair, I don't think ichi was trying to bait anyone. I think he just wanted to let alot of the people in this thread who talk with the banned member quite a bit know that it was not ichi who banned him so they wouldn't harass him about unbanning said member

But we all know how the internet works:

ron burgandy escalating quick meme.jpg

it could have been an elaborate troll attempt...can't play those kind of games on the internet..it aint safe

[ichitaka05]

Originally Posted by cjd

I do believe you're the one that brought the subject up... Or are ambiguous references OK, just not by name?

Or were you baiting the masses?

Not that it matters, but the rule makes sense to me. I've also done years as a mod on a car forum so know how it goes.

C

Haha, you're right. I did bring this to myself. BUT I post it for 2 reasons here.
1. Some dramatic members go crazy & start posting EVERYWHERE. (ex: When I temp banned Tcoat)
2. To let other member see how some member think they're over forum rules and get banned (ex: Banning members from Member Classified section)

Mostly, usual random thought members don't dig in too detail on these kind of posts from me. They think "Cool story, bro" and move on. But from today on, I'll avoid these kind posts and let all the fun hide in the dark.

Originally Posted by 86Boyz

Can we have their names so we can know who ruined it for all of us?

Nope... more like I don't remember their name.

[Ultramaroon]

Originally Posted by ichitaka05

Mostly, usual random thought members don't dig in too detail on these kind of posts from me. They think "Cool story, bro" and move on. But from today on, I'll avoid these kind posts and let all the fun hide in the dark.

No slack for the hall monitor.

[ichitaka05]

Originally Posted by Ultramaroon

No slack for the hall monitor.

Seriously. If I really was hardcore one, FX would of been perma banned already lol

[Phijkchu]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

No they are USPS boxes so you lose HP. Need UPS of at least Purolator to gain anything.

USPS has smaller and lighter trucks than UPS. Just a thought.

[EAGLE5]

Originally Posted by Ultramaroon

Free Willy.

Keep your pants on, mister.