|
|
#197 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Drives: 2016 FR-S MT, 2015 Scion FR-S AT,
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 487
Thanks: 271
Thanked 307 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Do we know if SSC will require the lockout washers or not? Since we will all be on the same shocks, I don't see a need for the washers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#199 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 71 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Can someone educate me on these washers or point me to where I can read more about them? About how much camber can a SSC car get with them and camber bolts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#200 |
|
Custom User Title
|
Read somewhere in the last 15 pages of the C-Street thread. Konis have a larger hole in the top slot of the front shocks so they could gain 1 degree more camber. Washers were sent out to fix this. It doesn't matter in SSC because you get camber bolts... the washer is irrelevant with the camber bolts.
__________________
LOCUST 2015 FR-S (STX) and 2012 Evo X MR Instagram: LocustAutoX Sponsors:DSGPerformance Drift Office Evil Apex Racing |
|
|
|
|
|
#201 | |
|
-
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
http://apexjunky.com/2015/12/koni-ad...al-for-frsbrz/ No ideas how much you'll get as when it was happening in CS you only got one camber bolt and ssc will give you two, but back then people were getting -2 or more. Edit iirc the washer/no washer is not irrelevant as you'll still be using the crash bolt in the upper hole and the spc in the bottom hole. I'd be surprised if this was enough to get you -3 which is probably what people would want so you'll still be asking the alignment guy for maximum negative up front. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#202 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: In Perfect Control At All Times
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 117
Thanks: 66
Thanked 28 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I personally don't imagine wanting quite that much camber. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#203 | |
|
-
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
fwiw when I was first autocrossing I was running totally stock except Z2SS, Whiteline upper camber bolts and Raceseng camber plates and I was right around -3.2 up front and loved the balance of the car (more camber was too much front grip and I chased the rear, less camber and the front pushed), I'm a different driver now and with SSC you'll be able to dial in rear alignment as well for better grip than I had at the time, but I can't imagine you'd want less than 2.8 or so, I'd start with -3.0 if I were building the car and had that much adjustability and would plan on going up from there. To put it another way, STX 86's seem to be playing in between -3 & -4 for front camber, and you can put all the spring and swaybar you want on the car to control body roll and they STILL want that much camber. Compare to softer lowering springs and I bet most SSC cars will be maxed out, but maybe I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post: | Ultramaroon (09-16-2017) |
|
|
#204 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: In Perfect Control At All Times
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 117
Thanks: 66
Thanked 28 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Now if only they could do some other things to make the class really really interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#205 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Some kind of Subaru
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 769
Thanks: 276
Thanked 257 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to G_Ride For This Useful Post: | strat61caster (09-17-2017) |
|
|
#206 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Drives: 2016 FR-S MT, 2015 Scion FR-S AT,
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 487
Thanks: 271
Thanked 307 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
At some point, the top of the wheel will have clearance issues with the stock-sized springs. I think the STX guys can run skinny springs on their coil-overs and camber plates.
I was told the sample car had about 2 degrees. There was not a lot of space between the top of the wheel and the spring/strut. |
|
|
|
|
|
#207 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Drives: '15 STX
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 237
Thanks: 10
Thanked 157 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Sample car was running -2. At one point in development the owner did max out the front at -3 and change. Considering there is a bit of camber loss with travel, and the car is softly sprung, somewhere around the max is going to be close to the optimal setting. Can get away with less on asphalt sites.
Rear toe/camber setting will be the more interesting part of setup for the car, since I felt the Street trim of the car abruptly broke loose on mid to corner exit. Also; hi. I will be running this next season. :P |
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tony_r For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#208 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: DS FRS
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 447
Thanks: 18
Thanked 211 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm not convinced all that rear adjustable crap is needed unless that car is slammed. I could be wrong of course, but initially I think I will skip it. When I had my old BRZ on Eibach springs, rear alignment was not an issue.
Edit : Are you buying one Tony, or did you find yourself a Sugar Daddy?
__________________
-Max H.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Drives: '15 STX
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 237
Thanks: 10
Thanked 157 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Sugar Daddies are a hell of a gateway drug, I find.
Last edited by tony_r; 09-18-2017 at 06:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#210 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 71 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The rear gains negative camber through its compression stroke. Doesn't that mean you would want less static negative camber to attain the biggest contact patch in a corner? I'm not well-versed in front to rear camber ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upgrading brakes on the lower spec GT86 (the standard spec outside of US market) | OnionTou | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 55 | 07-01-2016 02:36 AM |
| what's the difference between twin screw, centrifugal, single turbo and twin turbo? | warplane95 | Forced Induction | 86 | 04-17-2014 03:36 PM |
| my twin | RWDGUY | Mid-Atlantic | 2 | 04-08-2013 10:23 PM |
| JDM Spec-C V9 Twin Scroll VF36 complete | Nico TURBO | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 0 | 12-05-2012 12:20 PM |