follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB

Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB Problems, issues, recalls, TSBs

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2013, 01:54 PM   #85
SkullWorks
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SSM LT MT BRZ
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,033
Thanks: 803
Thanked 754 Times in 328 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadewbj View Post
I do know that Nissan will void the warranty on a GTR in a hot minute. Do anything to the car and the will not warranty, use launch controll = no warranty. It is terrible. The difference is that most GTR drivers can afford to pay to fix anything they need.

Please stop with the misinformation, this has nothing to do with the topic at hand and it is bad information.

If you mod a GT-R, you will likely get your warranty pulled for whatever portion of the car is modified, that is status Quo, get over it.

As discussed, Nissan Will NOT refuse warranty for tracking the GT-R, you must play by their rules and allow them to inspect the car after the track event last I heard, but rules are rules, get used to them they aren't going away, there's rules everywhere.

can we quit talking in circles about this, it isn't helping the case, and there are alot of people subscribed to this thread that don't like getting notified everytime someone wants to throw in something they think they know,
SkullWorks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SkullWorks For This Useful Post:
Lonewolf (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 02:17 PM   #86
dsgerbc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: BRZ(sold), STI
Location: A2, MI
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 176
Thanked 419 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie View Post
Track use, auto-x, racing, etc. are not considered "normal usage" regardless of what the brochure or advertising says.
I'd like to see Subaru deny an otherwise stock and never reflashed engine claim because of autox (however legal that might be). It would be a terrible PR move. Track/racing - sure. Reflashed engine (autox-ed) - sure. Stock engine autoxed - I doubt it. Unlike the track, it is well with-in reasonable pattern of 'normal usage' for a car like this to accelerate @WOT for several seconds during the day.
dsgerbc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dsgerbc For This Useful Post:
Rampage (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 02:20 PM   #87
jadewbj
Senior Member
 
jadewbj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Whiteout Scion FRS
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 101
Thanked 525 Times in 307 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkullWorks View Post
Please stop with the misinformation, this has nothing to do with the topic at hand and it is bad information.

If you mod a GT-R, you will likely get your warranty pulled for whatever portion of the car is modified, that is status Quo, get over it.

As discussed, Nissan Will NOT refuse warranty for tracking the GT-R, you must play by their rules and allow them to inspect the car after the track event last I heard, but rules are rules, get used to them they aren't going away, there's rules everywhere.

can we quit talking in circles about this, it isn't helping the case, and there are alot of people subscribed to this thread that don't like getting notified everytime someone wants to throw in something they think they know,
It was brought up by someone else. I just added. I am out.

Peace.
jadewbj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 02:28 PM   #88
SubieNate
Senior Member
 
SubieNate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Ultramarine
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 959
Thanks: 288
Thanked 560 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'm with those saying take it to Autoblog/Jalopnik. That's a PR nightmare for them.

Nathan
SubieNate is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SubieNate For This Useful Post:
TemeCal (05-30-2013), Tim_Asphalt_FRS (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 02:39 PM   #89
King Tut
NASA SpecE30 Racer
 
King Tut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2006 Honda S2000
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 7,279
Thanks: 607
Thanked 5,759 Times in 3,055 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
Tagged: 10 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to King Tut
I am not sure how refusing to cover a second blown engine that occured during a timed competition on a race track is a PR nightmare for them. Right now we don't even know definitively what caused the engine to cease.
__________________
King Tut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to King Tut For This Useful Post:
Opie (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 02:48 PM   #90
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Tut View Post
I am not sure how refusing to cover a second blown engine that occured during a timed competition on a race track is a PR nightmare for them. Right now we don't even know definitively what caused the engine to cease.
I'm gonna add a quick clarification here.

The car has been attended timed events. In other words,lap times were being tracked. Every participant at the events the car attended is offered timing, typically at no cost.

When a timing transponder is offered for free, wouldn't you take it? If you were being stopwatched by hand, isn't it still a timed event? Isn't an autox a timed event?

The engine did NOT seize during a "timed competition".
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 02:54 PM   #91
King Tut
NASA SpecE30 Racer
 
King Tut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2006 Honda S2000
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 7,279
Thanks: 607
Thanked 5,759 Times in 3,055 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
Tagged: 10 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to King Tut
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
I'm gonna add a quick clarification here.

The car has been attended timed events. In other words,lap times were being tracked. Every participant at the events the car attended is offered timing, typically at no cost.

When a timing transponder is offered for free, wouldn't you take it? If you were being stopwatched by hand, isn't it still a timed event? Isn't an autox a timed event?

The engine did NOT seize during a "timed competition".
Would I take it, yes. I will clarify then and state that the engine was used during a "timed competition" namely the FT86cup. Is that an accurate statement? What kind of gauges and datalogging did you have on the car when it seized? Did it seize on the street or during a session on track? I am truly interested in what caused the engine to seize. I don't want to assume it was just the direct injector seals failing.
__________________
King Tut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to King Tut For This Useful Post:
Opie (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 03:06 PM   #92
finch1750
Undisputed El Presidente
 
finch1750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Zenki 37J ZN6
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 11,593
Thanks: 9,403
Thanked 9,411 Times in 5,270 Posts
Mentioned: 374 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
Like others have said get an attorney. You have two possible arguments. The racing vs. HPDE argument as well as the statement you used the car for a purpose other than designed. All the marketing material talking track use and how this feature and that is the purpose of that design/feature.

Contact your county bar association. They generally do referals for a nominal fee (like 30 minutes for $30).
__________________

"Just like how a strut bar somehow enables you to corner 20MPH faster around a cloverleaf on-ramp, when the reality is, you can do it already but you just don't have to balls to do it." - CSG David
finch1750 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 03:44 PM   #93
wu_dot_com
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: accord
Location: ca
Posts: 454
Thanks: 297
Thanked 178 Times in 86 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
so you are that white BRZ that was in for engine repair. one of the guys there at Irvine subaru told me abuout this.
wu_dot_com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 04:01 PM   #94
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wu_dot_com View Post
so you are that white BRZ that was in for engine repair. one of the guys there at Irvine subaru told me abuout this.
That probably is the one...
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 04:15 PM   #95
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
If I had a car like the FRS/BRZ I would want to take it out to the track or else otherwise I would feel like I am missing the bigger point in this car. If you just DD this car wouldn't it feel like any other car but just lower to the ground? That's messed up how they are treating you especially since the engine is stock.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 04:34 PM   #96
RYU
Senior Member
 
RYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: really slow...
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 737
Thanks: 340
Thanked 253 Times in 145 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Free legal advice... Will be worth taking 1 hr out of your day to visit. June 1 in Anaheim.

http://www.businessexpocenter.com/ev....asp?id=314779
RYU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 04:54 PM   #97
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RYU View Post
Free legal advice... Will be worth taking 1 hr out of your day to visit. June 1 in Anaheim.

http://www.businessexpocenter.com/ev....asp?id=314779
Funny, I listen to Handel all the time when I'm driving up to events...
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
number1Tango (08-13-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 04:59 PM   #98
maj75
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Blue FRS 6sp, 95 M3
Location: South Florida
Posts: 115
Thanks: 6
Thanked 43 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I just read your description of the FT86 Cup in the Tracking forum.

I hate to be a downer, but timed competition for prizes sounds like the definition of "racing" even if it isn't wheel to wheel.

You will have to have evidence that the failure is unrelated to the specific "racing" events, as opposed to other non-FT86 Cup events the car is driven in.

Subaru will then have to come up with some evidence that the failure "resulted from operating the vehicle in any competition or racing event." Just because you "raced" the car, does not mean the warranty is cancelled forever more. It is only cancelled for something that was damaged by the "racing event". If the damage occurred during a traditional HPDE (no time, no prizes, no awards) then the warranty does not exclude the damage.

The judge or arbitrator then weighs the evidence and makes a decision.

I don't know what percentage of your driving was in the FT86 cup vs other HPDE events, but if the FT86 Cup was less than 50%, it is going to be tough for Subaru to prove which event did the damage that resulted in the failure.

GET THE MOTOR FROM THE DEALER AND HAVE IT EXAMINED BY AN EXPERT. DOCUMENT THE INSPECTION AND GET A REPORT. PAY THE EXPERT AND GET A RECEIPT. YOU MUST HAVE EVIDENCE ABOUT WHAT CAUSED THE FAILURE, AND WHEN THAT DAMAGE OCCURRED!

Hopefully, your expert will conclude that the FT86 Cup events were not the cause of the failure
maj75 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We Ask Toyota & Subaru about James May's Claim that Toyota Gets 90% of GT 86/FR-S/BRZ vh_supra26 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 94 09-15-2013 09:55 PM
Denied service... Chen Northwest 37 09-13-2013 09:37 PM
HELP with diminished value claim! zohare Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 41 04-03-2013 12:17 PM
Hit and Run Insurance Claim CharlieChaos Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 9 12-26-2012 09:54 PM
Japan loses its claim to "Creepiest Asian Country" reni Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 3 05-08-2012 12:57 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.