|
||||||
| Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: GT86
Location: The Motherland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 140
Thanked 473 Times in 271 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So there's a few exhaust manifolds/headers out now which supposedly get rid of the torque dip.
One which come to mind are Nameless, FA20Club and Borla UEL. So the first two above look reasonably similar, but the Borla is completely different. So it's not safe to assume the extra length of the first two is causing the increase in torque, as the Borla doesn't have that. Discuss. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: ex500r
Location: AR
Posts: 859
Thanks: 13
Thanked 105 Times in 77 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think all headers take it away. The OEM headers are the problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
That guy
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: Ultramarine mt FR-S
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,370
Thanks: 692
Thanked 1,389 Times in 730 Posts
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The stock system is built for comfort and economy. The average joe wants a quiet, economical vehicle. People who mod are willing to sacrifice some of that.
__________________
Ultramarine mt FR-S
P&L stage 1 turbo Prime Motoring Flex fuel Jr Tuned 506whp @17psi (e73) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: GT86
Location: The Motherland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 140
Thanked 473 Times in 271 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
How is the Borla manifold a 'long tube header' in comparison to something like the JDL one, which doesn't flatten out the torque dip in a similar fashion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
That guy
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: Ultramarine mt FR-S
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,370
Thanks: 692
Thanked 1,389 Times in 730 Posts
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I've yet to see a JDL header dyno with a tune. The one in their thread is un-tuned, except for the goofy "lateral G force" graph.
__________________
Ultramarine mt FR-S
P&L stage 1 turbo Prime Motoring Flex fuel Jr Tuned 506whp @17psi (e73) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: GT86
Location: The Motherland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 140
Thanked 473 Times in 271 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So do you expect pretty much any of the 4-1 aftermarket manifolds (excluding perhaps the abortions from people like HKS), will remove the torque dip with a tune?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
That guy
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: Ultramarine mt FR-S
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,370
Thanks: 692
Thanked 1,389 Times in 730 Posts
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think most will have a positive effect on the dip with a tune. If you don't want to take a guess, just wait until the numbers start leaking out from third parties. Product manufacturers have one goal, to sell product. Third party dynos will back up, or disprove their claims.
__________________
Ultramarine mt FR-S
P&L stage 1 turbo Prime Motoring Flex fuel Jr Tuned 506whp @17psi (e73) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: GTS 86
Location: Australia
Posts: 989
Thanks: 873
Thanked 476 Times in 272 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
For all of you who want the dip gone here is an explanation from someone who knows a thing or two about tuning/engines:
"As posted somewhere previously, the “torque dip” is a result of engine internal design not tuning. The only thing tuning can do is move the dip somewhere else. There’s a long discussion here, but the best way to think of it is to look at the torque curve… if you permit me some artistic license, the torque curve looks like two hills with a valley at either end and another in the center. Each of the hills is a cam profile… low speed on the left and high speed on the right. The peak of each hill is the maximum breathing that cam can provide… either side of the peak the cam doesn’t breath as well and that will only change by re-profiling the cam's lift and/or duration - you can only change the hill shape by re-profiling the cam. Changing the VVTi timing just moves the peak left or right... the problem is if you move, for example, the high speed peak left to fill in the valley between the two peaks, the valley to the right of the high speed peak gets deeper very quickly and the engine falls on it's face." Therefore, there is no tune out there that removes the dip..yes it might either reduce it or move it elsewhere, but you cant completely remove it without upgrading the cams. I am sure that in the following months/years we will see some modified cams ready to go for our cars, but until then we will have to deal with it. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Hawk77FT For This Useful Post: | Sonolin (04-29-2013) |
|
|
#9 | |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,639
Thanks: 632
Thanked 982 Times in 537 Posts
Mentioned: 100 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I assume the real answer is way over my head and has to do with harmonics and wave theory. The way I imagine it (note i am not saying this is the case, just the way my tiny brain tries to wrap around it) the design of the factory header creates a sort of standing wave in the exhaust at the "dip" rpm range... thus creating excessive back pressure which kills scavenging and causes the air flow to drop significantly in the dip (as i have logged over and over again). If my magic wave unicorn theory is correct then a change in primary length, primary diameter, collector design etc COULD change or remove the restriction. As we have seen, not all of them seem to do that, but a few certainly do.
__________________
~Namaste~ |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mad_sb For This Useful Post: | Hawaiian (04-28-2013) |
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Anytown
Posts: 920
Thanks: 73
Thanked 643 Times in 302 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Removal of the cat....more than anything
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
That guy
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: Ultramarine mt FR-S
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,370
Thanks: 692
Thanked 1,389 Times in 730 Posts
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
![]() The red line is with a cat. It's actually flatter than the blue line (with cat).
__________________
Ultramarine mt FR-S
P&L stage 1 turbo Prime Motoring Flex fuel Jr Tuned 506whp @17psi (e73) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
As for the reason not all headers behave the same, it all comes down to flow and resonance in the header. If you look at the length of the primaries in the nameless long tube they're quite longer than most of the other headers out there. There's simply no room for a cat in the header with the longer primaries, so you need a cat in over pipe if you need one. Diameters, steps, length between steps, etc all play a part as well. 4-2-1 headers also do better with low end torque than 4-1 headers, but typically at the cost of a little bit of power up top.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak... flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Anytown
Posts: 920
Thanks: 73
Thanked 643 Times in 302 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Figured I would share this April 28th | celek | NY / NJ / CT / PA | 0 | 04-08-2013 02:57 PM |
| Apparently you can fit 4 wheels/tires in this car | empower-auto | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 23 | 03-31-2013 09:36 PM |
| Has anyone figured this out yet? | chrisrefaei | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 16 | 10-26-2012 05:52 PM |
| towed at 717miles CEL severe shaking (apparently a huge issue) | gdi2290 | Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB | 45 | 08-31-2012 11:25 AM |
| Front seatbelt shoulder guides apparently an issue for passengers | Mr 286 | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 3 | 07-01-2012 08:49 PM |