|
|
#29 | |
|
Professional Mechanic
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: 2017 86 6MT Oceanic
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 789
Thanks: 17
Thanked 634 Times in 371 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
![]() (pictured: 2JZFSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2010 Evo X MR-T
Location: NY
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
only if they use stratified charge. assuming you can reprogram the ecu to not run stratified charge, a simple piston swap may be enough to lower compression, among other ways...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I think you can't mess with the piston shape with D4-S, they don't use stratified charge but the piston is shaped so the direct injector + port injector create a very even distribution of fuel in the cylinder. If you remove the piston shape, don't expect the performance to stay the same; uneven AFR will promote detonation and poor combustion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2010 Evo X MR-T
Location: NY
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
the dish in the piston has little to do with D-4S, because other cars without D-4S have the dish as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 1993 Impreza w/ WRX Swap + FWD!
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,071
Thanks: 217
Thanked 952 Times in 500 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
1) Buy a WRX EJ20 turbo motor, wiring harness and ECU for $2000 used
2) Sell your FT86 motor for $2000 3) Profit! |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2010 Chevy Cobalt SS, 59 Ford F100
Location: Carlsbad, Comi-fornia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
That will most likely be the best thing to do with the car... except I'll keep my stock motor, that way you can put the stock one back in if you ever sell the car and keep your built subie engine
__________________
2010 Chevy Cobalt SS Treadstone Performance Stage 3 kit: CAI, Charge Pipes, TR8 intercooler, Maf Relocate, 52MM Turbosmart BOV, 3 inch catless downpipe, 3 inch catback, borla XR1 muffler, Exedy Hypersingle, TWM short throw shifter, 24PSI HPtuned by Terminator2 on E85/91 Last edited by ryridesmotox; 11-02-2011 at 09:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
![]() EDIT: So for people who only want a tiny bump in power, continuing the discussion from the main thread in main forum, 200hp at 7000 is actually pretty pathetic considering what went into this motor. A better exhaust might be able to give a little more and if you don't mind the slight decrease in fuel economy, bigger cams would do some too. 215hp might be realistic considering how the torque is a relatively impressive compared to torque peak 148ft-lb at 7000. And I am still betting a few years down the road there will be an engine update. I'm not getting a car anytime soon, still in college, but if I'm right I probably will go for said updated FT, well if nothing better comes out. Last edited by serialk11r; 11-02-2011 at 10:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post: | Toyota86.ir (03-03-2016) |
|
|
#37 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2007 OBP STI (SOLD)
Location: SD
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You forgot labor for installing your new(used) EJ20 turbo motor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2007 OBP STI (SOLD)
Location: SD
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
215.... I hope your talking WHP at that number, and even then your forgetting all the other stuff you can do to an NA motor.
EDIT: I was thinking more in the range of 260-280 still staying NA. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 1993 Impreza w/ WRX Swap + FWD!
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,071
Thanks: 217
Thanked 952 Times in 500 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2007 OBP STI (SOLD)
Location: SD
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Granted it depends on the block and internals, but it is entirely possible. Throw a really aggressive heads/cam set up on it, plus your headers,intake manifold, throttle body, and other basic bolt on's. I fail to see why you think that its not possible to milk another 60-80 hp out of it.
I'm pretty confident that its a very conservatively tuned motor like most factory production cars. I've also seen far more aggressive power gains from NA motors, for instance a 99 Formula with a heads/cam/intake/headers pushing 440 whp (305 is stock at crank). Why do you find it unreasonable to put 280 out of a FR-S / BRZ |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Not going to happen without changing displacement. And no, I was talking brake hp. There is no way some simple stuff like that will net 40hp in gains. I don't think I'm forgetting, I am just listing the things that would be relatively cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Accord Coupe
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 319
Thanks: 26
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
My old DC5 CR was 11.0:1, i stayed NA but planned on boosting, however car got totaled. But point in case that motor was high strong, many people i know boosted and did fine on stock parts. A friend of mine was pushing 320whp of 9 psi i think with a bolt on greddy kit. Point is though 12.5:1 is pretty high, higher than most wanted it to be, there will be a few kits out there not to mention the few that will custom buld their set up. I prolly boost mine anyway its all about how its tuned, personally im not power hungry so if i can boost and get 250whp running 7psi on stock safely ill be happy.
__________________
Stop bitching and crying!! This is a NO BITCHASSNESS zone!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New FR-S BRZ Technology Info! Engine specs, CoG, Drag Coefficient, Dimensions, etc. | Hachiroku | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 584 | 08-28-2023 09:53 PM |
| Engine build | Maxim | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 41 | 10-03-2011 10:22 PM |
| Geneva Preview: Techart to debut 911 Turbo, Turbo S | vh_supra26 | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 1 | 02-22-2010 07:20 PM |
| Super Bowl! | Midship Runabout | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 13 | 01-29-2010 05:02 PM |
| Super Lap Battle | S2KtoFT86 | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 0 | 12-10-2009 10:46 PM |