follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-02-2011, 04:20 PM   #15
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
12.5:1 static CR with good DI is not a real problem if you want light boost. A quick calculation tells me that with 93 octane, 10PSIg boost would be plausible for a tuned-to-the-edge-but-still-reliable setup, assuming IAT's are kept rational and the knock control as as good as anything from the past 10 model years.

That said, just because the combustion chamber might be able to handle the BMEP, doesn't meant the piston lands, wrist pins, con-rods, crank, bearings, block, head gasket, or cylinder head can handle the increase in BMEP. There is always a fuse, a weak-link, and it'll take testing, measurement, and trial-and-error to determine what's the weak links are to reliably achieve the power level you're interested in.

Since most tuners have minimal real experience with DI tuning, there will either be an influx of amateur engineering experiments flooding the market, or there will be a slow ramp-up by competent tuners that take the time to do things right [which is rare, especially with an affordable car]. By all means, buyer beware!
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 04:21 PM   #16
fred_boosted
Senior Member
 
fred_boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2008 EVO X GSR (Sold)
Location: USA
Posts: 100
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post
Just a thought Fred...maybe this might not be the car for you! How about drive it first before deciding if it needs more power. My .02
Thanks for advice.

I owned a 08 EVO X GSR with all bolt ons tunned with 337 AWHP 338 AWTQ.


Stupid people like me think more HP is better, I know that FT-86 is 1000 lb lighter than EVO. But I love turbo... I want put turbo on everything...

That just my plan, I guess lots people want do turbo buld...
__________________
I could get Maserati Quattroporte or BMW M3/M6.
But I gived up.
Why? Because thats just not my style.
fred_boosted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 04:24 PM   #17
ryridesmotox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2010 Chevy Cobalt SS, 59 Ford F100
Location: Carlsbad, Comi-fornia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
what you might be looking at is a flat or even reverse domed piston depending on what they have in there stock.

Honestly if you are going to do a lower end on this thing, a better option would be to..

a) leaving compression alone and upgrading head gaskets and piston rings... that will allow you to run higher cylinder pressure... oh yea and heavier valve springs...

or----

b) aftermarket subaru sti motor with every option you want, and swap ecu and such.
__________________
2010 Chevy Cobalt SS
Treadstone Performance Stage 3 kit: CAI, Charge Pipes, TR8 intercooler, Maf Relocate, 52MM Turbosmart BOV, 3 inch catless downpipe, 3 inch catback, borla XR1 muffler, Exedy Hypersingle, TWM short throw shifter, 24PSI HPtuned by Terminator2 on E85/91
ryridesmotox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 04:29 PM   #18
Toyota fr-s
Yes, Toyota fr-s
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: 1991 MR2 Turbo T-Top, Gen3 3SGTE
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 77
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Is the 12.5:1 CR a fact? I read through the entire post and they were just guessing that was it... Then people took off with that idea. just my 5 cents.
Toyota fr-s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 04:30 PM   #19
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyota fr-s View Post
Is the 12.5:1 CR a fact? I read through the entire post and they were just guessing that was it... Then people took off with that idea. just my 5 cents.
No one translated it.. but it's in the engine specs.. not sure what else it would be honestly.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 04:39 PM   #20
fred_boosted
Senior Member
 
fred_boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2008 EVO X GSR (Sold)
Location: USA
Posts: 100
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
No one translated it.. but it's in the engine specs.. not sure what else it would be honestly.
It is CR... I can type japanese and chinese ... 压縮比
__________________
I could get Maserati Quattroporte or BMW M3/M6.
But I gived up.
Why? Because thats just not my style.
fred_boosted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 05:11 PM   #21
Allch Chcar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fred_boosted View Post
Yes I'm not, just want begin to talk this topic.

And listen to adivces.

Why can't you just say why I'm wrong and tell us how to do thing right?
I am very sorry for offending you. I am not very good at disagreeing.

Logically what you said didn't make sense because a thinner headgasket increases compression ratio.

Others could misunderstand what you said and then believe it to be a fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
12.5:1 static CR with good DI is not a real problem if you want light boost. A quick calculation tells me that with 93 octane, 10PSIg boost would be plausible for a tuned-to-the-edge-but-still-reliable setup, assuming IAT's are kept rational and the knock control as as good as anything from the past 10 model years.

That said, just because the combustion chamber might be able to handle the BMEP, doesn't meant the piston lands, wrist pins, con-rods, crank, bearings, block, head gasket, or cylinder head can handle the increase in BMEP. There is always a fuse, a weak-link, and it'll take testing, measurement, and trial-and-error to determine what's the weak links are to reliably achieve the power level you're interested in.

Since most tuners have minimal real experience with DI tuning, there will either be an influx of amateur engineering experiments flooding the market, or there will be a slow ramp-up by competent tuners that take the time to do things right [which is rare, especially with an affordable car]. By all means, buyer beware!
^This +1.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fred_boosted View Post
It is CR... I can type japanese and chinese ... 压縮比
Wonderful! It can always come in handy to have someone with your skills! Like today, Aki and Ichitaka were very busy with work.

Personally, I am very happy that the compression is 12.5:1. It is high enough to be even more efficient with E85 yet still be safe for low boost with pump Gasoline. For turbocharging, a lower compression is usually more inline with most tuner's/builder's goals and safer and more reliable. In this case, I think high compression fits better with 90% of the car's purpose otherwise they would have used one of Subaru's turbo motors
__________________
-Allch Chcar

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonitti View Post
Daily Driver, occasional weekend drifter.
Allch Chcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 05:41 PM   #22
madfast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2010 Evo X MR-T
Location: NY
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
12.5 CR means a factory FI option is likely out of the question.
madfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 06:42 PM   #23
fred_boosted
Senior Member
 
fred_boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2008 EVO X GSR (Sold)
Location: USA
Posts: 100
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
I am very sorry for offending you. I am not very good at disagreeing.

Logically what you said didn't make sense because a thinner headgasket increases compression ratio.

Others could misunderstand what you said and then believe it to be a fact.

Never mind, I was so excited about the news so...

Glad that I can do some simple translate work for people.
__________________
I could get Maserati Quattroporte or BMW M3/M6.
But I gived up.
Why? Because thats just not my style.
fred_boosted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 06:56 PM   #24
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fred_boosted View Post
Never mind, I was so excited about the news so...

Glad that I can do some simple translate work for people.
Translate the rest of those tech info scans
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 07:04 PM   #25
Allch Chcar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Translate the rest of those tech info scans
Yes, please! If you would be so kind Fred_boost.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonitti View Post
Daily Driver, occasional weekend drifter.
Allch Chcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 07:45 PM   #26
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post
Just a thought Fred...maybe this might not be the car for you! How about drive it first before deciding if it needs more power. My .02
Ditto

Also when did S2k owner stopped them from SC or TC their S2k. Yes, US had 11.7:1 (vs JP was 12 iirc), that's still high comp for boosted car.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 07:49 PM   #27
70NYD
Senior Member
 
70NYD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: RX8 S1
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
diesels are what 17:1? MOST of them are boosted LOL
with petrol, and 12.5:1 you will get low boost but LOTS of power. energy is extracted MORE at a higher comp ratio, so a 10:1 running 10PSI will get more power than a 8:1 running 10PSI
__________________
70NYD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 07:54 PM   #28
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Diesels operate pretty differently, they cannot knock by design as the fuel is injected and burns slowly, instead of all at once (for this reason the diesel cycle is actually less efficient than Otto; effective compression ratio is much worse than the geometric compression because the fuel burns too slow, but since they don't need to worry about knock they just make the CR crazy high to compensate).
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New FR-S BRZ Technology Info! Engine specs, CoG, Drag Coefficient, Dimensions, etc. Hachiroku Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 584 08-28-2023 09:53 PM
Engine build Maxim Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 41 10-03-2011 10:22 PM
Geneva Preview: Techart to debut 911 Turbo, Turbo S vh_supra26 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 1 02-22-2010 07:20 PM
Super Bowl! Midship Runabout Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 13 01-29-2010 05:02 PM
Super Lap Battle S2KtoFT86 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 0 12-10-2009 10:46 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.