follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-31-2011, 08:44 PM   #309
sfwg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2007 saturn ion(dd)
Location: tucson, az
Posts: 188
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryridesmotox View Post
I am going to order mine as well...

about the tune... it doesn't seem to do anything for fuel economy for me... guess my right foot is too heavy.
NA vs turbo could have something to do with it too
__________________
2014 FRS
sfwg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 08:48 PM   #310
AudiTT
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2010 Audi TT S-line
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deslock View Post
I disagree. At this weight it'll be plenty for a daily driver/canyon carver.
But that peak is at so f****n' high revs that it makes driving in town a nightmare compared to a turbo. It's pretty annoying (in a long term, at least) to rev the engine to it's max every time you wanna make some progress. At least i'm an adult and don't use public roads for racing so every trafficlights is not a startingrid for me. And every roundabout is not made for powerslides... But this car is still made for public roads, right?

Quote:
Cost and weight.
I doubt that for example 1,6 liter motor with a turbo would've added much weight. Yes, turbo adds weight but smaller engine saves it.

I think something like Peugeot RCZ (probably not sold in the US) has would've been brilliant. 1,6 turbo 200hp, 275nm torque from 1700rpm. Efficient and doesn't have to be trashed like mad to keep up a decent pace.

And cost? In ^that^ example, i'd say Toyota will end up being more expensive here. Which is a shame.
AudiTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 08:58 PM   #311
ryridesmotox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2010 Chevy Cobalt SS, 59 Ford F100
Location: Carlsbad, Comi-fornia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AudiTT View Post
But that peak is at so f****n' high revs that it makes driving in town a nightmare compared to a turbo. It's pretty annoying (in a long term, at least) to rev the engine to it's max every time you wanna make some progress. At least i'm an adult and don't use public roads for racing so every trafficlights is not a startingrid for me. And every roundabout is not made for powerslides... But this car is still made for public roads, right?
I think we all ought to wait to cast judgement til we see a dyno of the motor... the torque curve may be pretty good all the way through until it peaks up top.
__________________
2010 Chevy Cobalt SS
Treadstone Performance Stage 3 kit: CAI, Charge Pipes, TR8 intercooler, Maf Relocate, 52MM Turbosmart BOV, 3 inch catless downpipe, 3 inch catback, borla XR1 muffler, Exedy Hypersingle, TWM short throw shifter, 24PSI HPtuned by Terminator2 on E85/91
ryridesmotox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:08 PM   #312
Aki
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Drives: '96 beater Corolla
Location: Cali
Posts: 409
Thanks: 7
Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AudiTT View Post
But that peak is at so f****n' high revs that it makes driving in town a nightmare compared to a turbo. It's pretty annoying (in a long term, at least) to rev the engine to it's max every time you wanna make some progress. At least i'm an adult and don't use public roads for racing so every trafficlights is not a startingrid for me. And every roundabout is not made for powerslides... But this car is still made for public roads, right?
So you don't want to go fast accelerating, and you don't want to take the turns fast... why would you be at all interested in any sports car, let alone the FT86? Sounds like you'd want a diesel economy car, great pick-up at low rpms.
Aki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:10 PM   #313
ryridesmotox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2010 Chevy Cobalt SS, 59 Ford F100
Location: Carlsbad, Comi-fornia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aki View Post
So you don't want to go fast accelerating, and you don't want to take the turns fast... why would you be at all interested in any sports car, let alone the FT86? Sounds like you'd want a diesel economy car, great pick-up at low rpms.
I'm pretty sure what he means is, he wants alot of usable power... which is beneficial on the track and the street to be honest. I personally don't care either way... a turbo will make sure the torque band is from 2k-6k rpm
__________________
2010 Chevy Cobalt SS
Treadstone Performance Stage 3 kit: CAI, Charge Pipes, TR8 intercooler, Maf Relocate, 52MM Turbosmart BOV, 3 inch catless downpipe, 3 inch catback, borla XR1 muffler, Exedy Hypersingle, TWM short throw shifter, 24PSI HPtuned by Terminator2 on E85/91
ryridesmotox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:13 PM   #314
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
HOLY I just realized this was here.

It's all pretty much in line with what we expected right? 2660 curb, 197hp, 30mpg.
@SUB-FT86 I think your Celica comparison is a bit off? lol I'm seeing 10 more horsepower, 200 more pounds of weight. So slower :/ the 2ZZ-GE had an aggressive low speed cam from what I hear, so people who drive that might not be that impressed with this car. This car probably has no different lift profiles, so the best that can be expected is around 200Nm through most of the rev range, if D-4S is as good as they say.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:18 PM   #315
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AudiTT View Post
But that peak is at so f****n' high revs that it makes driving in town a nightmare compared to a turbo. It's pretty annoying (in a long term, at least) to rev the engine to it's max every time you wanna make some progress. At least i'm an adult and don't use public roads for racing so every trafficlights is not a startingrid for me. And every roundabout is not made for powerslides... But this car is still made for public roads, right?
With proper gearing it's fine. My two street cars have peak torque numbers at 6,200 and 7,500 currently and both are just fine on the street. Yes, it takes a different style of driving (no shifting at 2,500RPM or expecting to pass in top gear as fast as a car with torque) but it's not a big deal at all.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:22 PM   #316
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
whoa a post was deleted :P
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:24 PM   #317
mkxr
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: honda fit
Location: IL
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AudiTT View Post
But that peak is at so f****n' high revs that it makes driving in town a nightmare compared to a turbo. It's pretty annoying (in a long term, at least) to rev the engine to it's max every time you wanna make some progress. At least i'm an adult and don't use public roads for racing so every trafficlights is not a startingrid for me. And every roundabout is not made for powerslides... But this car is still made for public roads, right?


I doubt that for example 1,6 liter motor with a turbo would've added much weight. Yes, turbo adds weight but smaller engine saves it.

I think something like Peugeot RCZ (probably not sold in the US) has would've been brilliant. 1,6 turbo 200hp, 275nm torque from 1700rpm. Efficient and doesn't have to be trashed like mad to keep up a decent pace.

And cost? In ^that^ example, i'd say Toyota will end up being more expensive here. Which is a shame.
The idea of this car is to be the best of both worlds, fun and economical commuter, and a great weekend racer. I drive a Honda Fit daily, low power, low torque, but it's a fun daily driver because it's under 2500 lbs. The RCZ may have more torque, but it's 3133 lbs, so although it's small, it's a cow.
I'm pretty sure you don't need to rev your engine to the max, to get from one red light to the next.
mkxr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:33 PM   #318
nickatdunning
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: 2006 focus st
Location: Ann arbor
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
As for scion pure pricing don't get too excited about discounts, it won't happen...every scion sale has to be sent to Toyota, including the price, and any options the customer had installed , they are very strict( I do some of the paperwork) , and heavy fines will be put on the dealership if they sell scions for different prices to people. The only way you will see discounts is if the dealership gave the same discount to every customers. So if a dealer decided to sell all of there fr-s' at $500 below sticker they can do that, but can never offer it for more or less than $500 off sticker.
nickatdunning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:36 PM   #319
Allch Chcar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
whoa a post was deleted :P
The dude was getting a bunch of responses by the time I posted so I just deleted it.

No, I didn't get moderated. -.-\
__________________
-Allch Chcar

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonitti View Post
Daily Driver, occasional weekend drifter.
Allch Chcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:37 PM   #320
AudiTT
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2010 Audi TT S-line
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryridesmotox View Post
I'm pretty sure what he means is, he wants alot of usable power... which is beneficial on the track and the street to be honest.
Exactly.

We'll see after the final release, but i start to have my doubts that this will be my next car. Compared to my current drive, too big step back in daily usability of the engine.

I like RWD and low weight, but hate low trq.

Starts to get really late here, good night.
AudiTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:39 PM   #321
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by AudiTT View Post
Exactly.

We'll see after the final release, but i start to have my doubts that this will be my next car. Compared to my current drive, too big step back in daily usability of the engine.

I like RWD and low weight, but hate low trq.

Starts to get really late here, good night.
Your current drive is quite fast :O Why not keep driving that? Need back seats?
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 09:44 PM   #322
tranzformer
Delights in pure handling
 
tranzformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickatdunning View Post
As for scion pure pricing don't get too excited about discounts, it won't happen...every scion sale has to be sent to Toyota, including the price, and any options the customer had installed , they are very strict( I do some of the paperwork) , and heavy fines will be put on the dealership if they sell scions for different prices to people. The only way you will see discounts is if the dealership gave the same discount to every customers. So if a dealer decided to sell all of there fr-s' at $500 below sticker they can do that, but can never offer it for more or less than $500 off sticker.
There was a discussion on here a few weeks back about Scion giving discounts to recent college grads and active duty military. Is that something that would get the price below sticker?
tranzformer is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
brz forum, brz forums, brz specs, brz sti forum, fr-s review, fr-s specs, frs review, frs reviews, ft-86 review, ft-86 specs, ft86 forum, ft86 forums, ft86 specs, scion fr-s, scion fr-s forum, scion fr-s horsepower, scion fr-s hp, scion fr-s review, scion fr-s reviews, scion fr-s specs, scion fr-s weigh, scion fr-s weight, scion frs, scion frs forum, scion frs review, scion frs specs, subaru brz, subaru brz forum, subaru brz forums, subaru brz horsepower, subaru brz hp, subaru brz specs, subaru brz sti, subaru brz sti forum, toyota ft-86, toyota ft-86 forum, toyota ft-86 horsepower, toyota ft-86 hp, toyota ft-86 review, toyota ft-86 specs


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AutoBild gives specs of the Subaru BRZ Ice_Man BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 43 10-30-2011 07:43 PM
Guessing Scion FR-S specs?? dClutch Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 58 04-29-2011 12:07 AM
If there is no Toyota will you go with Scion or Subaru tranzformer Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 91 04-26-2011 12:53 AM
200hp / 2700lbs - Really? Rickster Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 385 04-18-2011 03:47 PM
TRD options and Badging? BanningFT Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 43 11-08-2009 04:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.